Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rocket Ibrahim Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
I- 4 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 955/2015 ROCKET IBRAHIM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.Z.Chaudhary & Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Darpan Singh Mr. Athar Alam, Mrs. Sumer Athar & Mr. Azhar Alam, Advocates with respondents No.2 to 4 in person + CRL.M.C. 929/2015 SHAMS PARVEZ & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Athar Alam, Mrs. Sumer Athar & Mr. Azhar Alam, Advocates versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Darpan Singh Mr. M.Z.Chaudhary & Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person Crl.M.C.No.955/2014 Crl.M.C.No.929/2015 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned first petition [Crl.M.C.No.955/2015]., quashing of quashi...
Vivek Suri Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
I- 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1744/2015 VIVEK SURI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Mr. Apoorva Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocates versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Kuldeep Mr. S.S. Prashar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.175/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Maurya Enclave, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated Compromise-cum-Settlement Deed (Annexure-B) reached between the parties. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. S.S. Prashar, Advocate, accepts Crl.M.C.No.1744/2015 Page 1 notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, prese...
Nikhil Bhasin and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1747/2015 & Crl.M.A.6282/2015 NIKHIL BHASIN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vineet Aggarwal, Mr. Sidharth and Mr. Vidhan Vyag, Advocates versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Shyam Sunder Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.134/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention in the order of 5th July, 2014 of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Rohini Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be complainant/first-informant of the CRL.M.C. 1747/2015 Page 1 FIR ...
Pran Kumar Kaul Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2790/2000 28th April, 2015 % PRAN KUMAR KAUL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.D.S. Chauhan with Ms. Ruchi Singh and Ms. Tejasvi S. Nandal, Advocates. versus INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Snigdha Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Tandon, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who was an Assistant Manager with the respondent No.1/Bank, impugns the orders passed by the departmental authorities; Disciplinary Authority dated 30.12.1995 and Appellate Authority dated 27.05.1996; by which the petitioner has been imposed the punishment of removal from service.2. The facts of the case are that against the petitioner a charge-sheet dated 25.8.1994 was issued making a total of six allegations. The sum and substance of these six allegation...
Sanjeev Dayal and Anr. Vs. State of Delhi (Nct) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
I- 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1448/2015 SANJEEV DAYAL & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pradeep Nawani, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI (NCT) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Megh Raj Mr. Shashi Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.589/2007, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Badarpur, Delhi is in this petition. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Shashi Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/firstinformant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by Crl.M.C.No.1448/2015 Page 1 her counsel as well as...
Bhupender Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
I-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1055/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3939/2015 BHUPENDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Mehrab Alam Mr. Ankit Srivastava, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.05/2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC, registered at police station Khajuri Khas, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st November, 2012 reached between the parties at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Ankit Srivastava, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Crl.M.C.No.1055/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respond...
Shri S.K. Jindal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3264/2014 28th April, 2015. % SHRI S.K. JINDAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms.Manisha Rana Singh, Adv. for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.K. Tyagi for Respondent No.2. HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.7730/2015 1. By this application, the petitioner seeks reliefs that the order dated 13.03.2015 be recalled by which costs of Rs.10,000/- were imposed on the petitioner and that this Court should recuse itself from hearing the matter. The order dated 13.03.2015 reads as under:1. This case prima facie is a case of gross abuse of the process of law because the petitioner questions his transfer order, although the petitioner cannot question the transfer order. It is because of this reason that the interim application which was filed by the petitioner was dismissed b...
Shams Parvez and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
I- 4 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 955/2015 ROCKET IBRAHIM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.Z.Chaudhary & Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Darpan Singh Mr. Athar Alam, Mrs. Sumer Athar & Mr. Azhar Alam, Advocates with respondents No.2 to 4 in person + CRL.M.C. 929/2015 SHAMS PARVEZ & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Athar Alam, Mrs. Sumer Athar & Mr. Azhar Alam, Advocates versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Darpan Singh Mr. M.Z.Chaudhary & Mr. Mohd. Zahid Hussain, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person Crl.M.C.No.955/2014 Crl.M.C.No.929/2015 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned first petition [Crl.M.C.No.955/2015]., quashing of quashi...
Ehtesham Haider Khan Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 28, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1745/2015 EHTESHAM HAIDER KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Hasan Anzar and Mr. Samama Suhail, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shri Gopal Mr. L.B. Rao, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.497/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 23rd August, 2014 (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. L. B. Rao, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant CRL.M.C. 1745/2015 Page 1 of the FIR in quest...
Shri Lal Mahal Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-28-2015
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :28. 04.2015 + + + ITA2632015, C.M. APPL.7337/2015 ITA2642015, C.M. APPL.7349/2015 ITA2652015, C.M. APPL.7351/2015 SHRI LAL MAHAL LIMITED ..... Appellant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Prakash Kumar and Sh. Ravi Pratap Mall, Advocate, for the appellant. Ms. Suruchii Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Abhishek Sharma, for the revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % Issue notice.1. Ms. Suruchii Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel accepts notice. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter was heard finally.2. The following two questions of law are sought to be urged by the assessee in this appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the Act): (a) Whether in the given facts of the case, the assessment could have ITA2632015, ITA2642015 & ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »