Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abhishek Kumar Pandey Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 04.2015 W.P.(C) 4326/2014 ABHISHEK KUMAR PANDEY ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Alok K. Joseph. For the Respondents : Ms Saroj Bidawat for UOI. AND W.P.(C) 5667/2014 SANJAY KUMAR BHARTI & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Gulshan Sharma and Mr Sanjay Kumar. For the Respondents : Mr Arjun Harkauli and Mr Satyawan Sherawat. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner in W.P.(C) 4326/2014-Abhishek Kumar Pandey (hereafter 'Abhishek ') has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that his result for the NET examination in the subject of Law (Code:58. held in June, 2012, be set aside. Abhishek further prays that he be declared having cleared the said examination in the subje...
Sanjay Kumar Bharti and Anr Vs. University Grants Commission and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 04.2015 W.P.(C) 4326/2014 ABHISHEK KUMAR PANDEY ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Alok K. Joseph. For the Respondents : Ms Saroj Bidawat for UOI. AND W.P.(C) 5667/2014 SANJAY KUMAR BHARTI & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Gulshan Sharma and Mr Sanjay Kumar. For the Respondents : Mr Arjun Harkauli and Mr Satyawan Sherawat. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner in W.P.(C) 4326/2014-Abhishek Kumar Pandey (hereafter 'Abhishek ') has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that his result for the NET examination in the subject of Law (Code:58. held in June, 2012, be set aside. Abhishek further prays that he be declared having cleared the said examination in the subje...
M/S Bses Yamuna Power Ltd. Vs. M/S Talupula Engineering Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on February 10, 2015 Judgment delivered on April 29, 2015 + O.M.P. 301/2007 M/S BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate versus M/S TALUPULA ENGINEERING CO. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vaibhav Gaggar, Advocate with Mr.Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act in short) is to the award dated December 26, 2006 passed by the learned Arbitral Tribunal (Tribunal in short) consisting of three Members, whereby the Tribunal allowed eight claims out of eleven claimed by the respondent with interest @ 12% p.a and rejected the counterclaim of the petitioner herein. Facts:2. On November 27, 2002 the respondent submitted its bid for the work of supply, erection and commissioning of 66KV4CKT tower line from 220KV South of Wazirabad Grid Station, 66KV to Shastri Pa...
R. Murgadas and Ors. Vs. Satya Pal and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$-22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h April, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1145/2012 R. MURGADAS & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus SATYA PAL & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Manish Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent no.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.85,000/awarded in favour of the Appellants for the death of Smt. Rangamma who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 19.09.2002 involving a Tempo bearing no.DL1LA-5423.2. During the inquiry, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) held that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of Tempo bearing registration No.DL-1LA-5423 by its driver/Respondent Virender Yadav. It was further found that the Appellants were not financially dependent on the deceased. Relying on the judgment of this Court in National Insurance Com...
Ashok Goel (Architect) Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~41. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4280/2015 ASHOK GOEL (ARCHITECT) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg & Mr. Imran Khan, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Chawla with Ms. Nidhi Parashar, Mr. Ketan Paul & Mr. Aditya, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Adv. for R2/UGC. Mr. Mukul Talwar, Adv. for R3/GGSIPU. Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Adv. for R7/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ORDER % 29.04.2015 C.M.No.7764/2015 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) No.4280/2015 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks a direction to the respondent No.3 Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) to forthwith stop giving affiliation to colleges beyond its territorial jurisdiction. The petition also impugns Section 4(1) of the Indraprastha Vishwavidyalaya Ac...
Phool Singh and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 613/1999 Date of decision:29. 04.2015 Appellants PHOOL SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr.Sheikh Issar Ahmed, Advocate Versus Respondent STATE Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State with Inspector Ajmer Singh, PS Punjabi Bagh. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 23.10.1999 and order on sentence dated 26.10.1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Session case No.11/98 by virtue of which all the appellants have been convicted under section 302/34 and section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as "IPC"), and sentenced to undergo Imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, and in default of the payment of fine to further undergo rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four months. The appellants were also ...
Mohd Shahnawaz Zaheer Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 04.2015 CS(OS) 280/2015, IA Nos.2291-2292/2015 & 3369/2015 MOHD SHAHNAWAZ ZAHEER ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar Jagia & Mr. Amit Sood & Mr. Abhijeet Negi, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Jayendra, Adv. for D-1 with Mr. Krishna Kumar, SDM, Defence Colony. Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Adv. for D-2. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(OPEN COURT) On 19.02.2015, this Court had inter alia ordered: This suit seeks appointment of the plaintiff Mr. Mohd. Shahnawaz Zaheer son of late Mr. Zaheer Ahmed resident of 111, Pocket-1, Jasola, New Delhi-110025 as the guardian of Master Ayush Dayal (Minor) and Baby Prarthana Dayal (Minor). The plaintiff resides with his family comprising his wife and two daughters. The elder daughter is stated to be 19 years old and is presently pursuing a degree in Finance and Economics from Hong Kong University. The younger daughter is 16 years old and studies at Delhi Public School, R...
Ravinder Singh Payal Vs. Gic Housing Finance Ltd. and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29th April, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8579/2014, C.M. No.19788/2014 RAVINDER SINGH PAYAL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Adv. versus GIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD. & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary and Mr.Akhil Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. In these proceedings the jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226- 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked to assail the order dated 17.10.2014 of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the DRAT) in appeal No.25/2013 arising out of Securitization Application (SA) No.29/2007 which had been dismissed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-II Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the DRT) by order dated 16.07.2012.2. The background facts, briefly stated, are that the petitioner, intending to purchase a lower income group (LIG) residential flat (bearing No.C-2 (LIG), second ...
M/S Maxgrow Pte Ltd. (M/S Sarmon Pte Ltd) Vs. M/S Cheminova Industries ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~A* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 04.2015 + CS(OS) 4427/1992 M/S MAXGROW PTE LTD. (M/S SARMON PTE LTD.) ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Anil Airi, Mr.Ravi Krishan Chandna, Ms.Sadhna Sharma, Mr. Aman Madan, and Mr. Gaurav Seth, Advocates. Versus M/S CHEMINOVA INDUSTRIES (P.) LTD. .... Defendant Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed under Order 37 CPC seeking a decree of recovery for USD278,616.00 equivalent to Rs.86,35,088.80/-. Unconditional leave to defend was granted to the defendant vide judgment dated 05.03.2002.2. The basis of the present suit is supply of goods/raw material from the plaintiff. The plaintiff is said to be a private limited company incorporated under the laws of Singapore. The suit is filed seeking recovery of dues based on 9 invoices totaling USD278,616. It is averred that the bills of lading have also been filed annexed as Exhibit B to the plaint. It is further stated tha...
Vipul Rohilla Vs. Meenakshi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~17 & 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 13/2015 Decided on 29th April, 2015 VIPUL ROHILLA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Rohilla, Adv. with appellant in person. versus MEENAKSHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advs. along with respondent in person. AND CRL.A. 14/2015 VIPUL ROHILLA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Rohilla, Adv. with appellant in person. versus MEENAKSHI ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant is husband of respondent. Their marriage was solemnised on 14th February, 2000. It appears that relations between them became sour resulting in various litigations filed by them against each other. Respondent has lodged an FIR under Sections 498-A/406 IPC wherein trial is pending. Respondent had also filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance from the appellant as also a petition under Section 18 of the Hindu A...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »