Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumari Sushila Yadav Vs. Lt. Col. (Retd) Atul Chaudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: February 09, 2015 Date of Decision: April 29, 2015 + CS(OS) 364/2014 KUMARI SUSHILA YADAV ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K. K. Sharma and Mr.Ashutoh Chaudhri, Advocates. Versus LT. COL. (RETD) ATUL CHAUDHARY ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Lata Krishnamurti, Ms. Pritha Srikumar, Mr. Karan Kalia, Mr.P.R. Mala and Mr. Pranav Diesh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.12579/2014 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree of possession and leaving the issue of damages, mesne profits, etc. to be decided on merits.2. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit seeking a decree of possession regarding the suit property bearing No.E-39A, East of Kailash, New Delhi-110065 and other reliefs of damages, mesne profits, etc. It is the contention of the plaintiff that she is a senior citizen aged 88 years and the absolute o...
Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. Bijender Kumar Panwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h April, 2015 + CRL.A. 1238/2011 VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. F.K. Jha, Advocate versus BIJENDER KUMAR PANWAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the acquittal order passed in favour of the respondent in CC No.480/1 filed by the appellant before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, present appeal has been preferred under Section 378(4) r/w Section 482 Cr.P.C.2. Complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was filed by the appellant against the respondent, inter alia, on the allegations that the respondent took a loan of Rs.3,45,000/- with interest @ 18% per annum from the appellant on 15th January, 2006 for his daughters marriage with the promise that he would return the loan amount within two years. At that time the respondent issued vari...
Shatrughan Thakur Vs. The Director of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5189/2014 29th April, 2015 % SHATRUGHAN THAKUR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.M.A.Niyazi with Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Purnima Maheswari, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Divia Sinderrajan, Advocate for R2 & 3. W.P.(C) No.5190/2014 VIKRAM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.M.A.Niyazi with Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Purnima Maheswari, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Divia Sinderrajan, Advocate for R2 & 3. W.P.(C) No.5191/2014 RAVI KUMAR W.P.(C) No.5189/2014 & connected Through Mr.M.A.Niyazi with Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Purnima Maheswari, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Divia Sinderrajan, Advocate for R2 & 3. W.P.(C) No.5344/2014 BIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.M.A.Niyazi with Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION &...
Shri Syed Moiz Quadri Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.7844/1999 29th April, 2015 % SHRI SYED MOIZ QUADRI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.M.Atyab Siddiqui, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.S.D.Salwan, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr.Raghuvendra Mohan Bajaj, Advocate for R- 3 & 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Review Petition No.16/2015 & C.M.No.674/2015 VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner, a teacher in the respondent no.3/Anglo Arabic Senior Secondary School, seeking the relief that termination of his services by the undated letter of December, 1999, stating that the petitioner is not qualified, be quashed. The petitioner in the writ petition had prayed that it should be declared that he had the necessary qualification for being appointed to the post of T.G.T (Maths) in the respondent no.3/School and at which post he w...
Maya Devi and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 29, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 1070/2013 & Crl.M.A.3335/2013 MAYA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anurag Abhishek, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: + (ii) .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Abhishek Kumar Mr. G.L. Soni, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 1082/2013 & Crl.M.A.3347/2013 MAYA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anurag Abhishek, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Abhishek Kumar Mr. G.L. Soni, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 1070 & 1082 of 2013 Page 1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.121/2011 and 125/2011 both under Sections 420/468/471/34 of IPC registered at police station Prasad Na...
Shri Subrata Bhaumik Vs. Reserve Bank of India Services Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.4368/2012 29th April, 2015 % SHRI SUBRATA BHAUMIK Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Anju Bhattacharya, Advocate with Mr. Elgin Matt John, Advocate. Versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA SERVICES BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advocate, Mr. H.S. Parihar, Advocate and Ms. Karishma Singhania, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was a candidate in the selection process for the post of Officer in Grade-B in Reserve Bank of India, seeks the relief that the final marks which have been given to him of 177 be increased to 183 marks and therefore he should be selected as per the selection process instead of his candidature being rejected as has been done by the respondent.2. The facts of the case are that with respect to em...
Sanjeev Sood and Ors Vs. Ravi Kanta Madhok
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 205/2015 Decided on:29. h April, 2015 % SANJEEV SOOD & ORS Through ..... Petitioner Mr. K.R. Chawla, Adv. versus RAVI KANTA MADHOK Through ..... Respondent Mr. Mithilesh Kr. Singh, Mr. Tarun Verma, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) CAVEAT4212015 Learned counsel for the caveator enters appearance. Caveat is discharged. CM78992015 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. RC.REV. 205/2015 & CM78982015 (stay) 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 31st January, 2015 whereby an eviction order was passed after evidence was led by the parties in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) DRC Act, the petitioners prefer the present petition.2. Smt. Ravi Kanta Madhok filed an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) DRC Act for eviction of petitioners i.e. Sanjeev Sood, Amit Sood and Smt. Rachna Chawla all legal heirs of late Shri Lakhpat Rai Sood who was a tenant in respect of Shop No.2 in House No.11/4, West P...
Rajbir Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 29, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1781/2015 RAJBIR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Renu Bala Arora, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Jagdeep Mr. Piyush Agarwal, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.6414/2015 This application is for condonation of delay in re-filing the accompanying petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and delay is condoned. Crl.M.C.No.1781/2015 Quashing of FIR No.491/2007 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Sri Niwas Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of joint statement made before the Family Court on 5th July, 2013. Crl.M.C.No.1781/2015 Page 1 Notice. Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Piyush Agarwal, Advocate, accept...
Maya Devi and Ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 29, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 1070/2013 & Crl.M.A.3335/2013 MAYA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anurag Abhishek, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: + (ii) .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Abhishek Kumar Mr. G.L. Soni, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 1082/2013 & Crl.M.A.3347/2013 MAYA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anurag Abhishek, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Abhishek Kumar Mr. G.L. Soni, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 1070 & 1082 of 2013 Page 1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.121/2011 and 125/2011 both under Sections 420/468/471/34 of IPC registered at police station Prasad Na...
Shri Hakumat Rai Vs. Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5318/2013 and CM No.11908/2013 (for directions) SHRI HAKUMAT RAI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Vaishalee Mehra, Advocate versus DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER % 29.04.2015 1. By this writ petition, a direction is sought qua the respondent for allotment of a shop in Gazipur Mandi or any other newly developed market and for grant of category B license.2. In this petition, notice was issued on 01.10.2013. Since then, the respondent has filed its counter affidavit. The counter affidavit has been followed by a rejoinder.3. Briefly, the background, in which the petitioner has approached this court, is as follows :3.1 The petitioner, who is a proprietor of the concern run under the same name claims that he commenced his business as a Mashakore, at Phool Mandi, Darya Ganj, way back, in 1968. 3.2 It is averred that wit...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »