Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamlesh Kaur Sherma and Anr Vs. Hemanshu Malhotra and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2621/2011 Reserved on:18. 02.2015 Date of decision:30. 04.2015 IN THE MATTER OF: KAMLESH KAUR SHERMA & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Advocate with Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh and Mr. Jitender Singh, Advocates versus HEMANSHU MALHOTRA AND ORS ..... Defendants Through: Defendant No.1 is ex parte. Ms. Isha Abrol, Advocate for D-2. Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate with Ms. Rishika Katyal, Advocate for D-3. Mr. Saurabh Suman Sinha, Advocate for the applicant in I.A. 18742/2014. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.I.A. 18742/2014 (by the applicant, Smt. Rajinder Kaur under Order I Rule 10 CPC) 1. The present application has been filed by the applicant, Smt. Rajinder Kaur, praying inter alia for impleadment as a co-defendant in the suit proceedings.2. The plaintiffs have instituted the present suit for recovery of possession, damages, mandatory and permanent injunction in respect of the third floor of the premises bearing No....
Kalicharan Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +CRL.A. 107/2013 Judgment reserved on 23.02.2015 % Judgment delivered on 30th April, 2015 KALICHARAN Appellant Mr. Sameer Chandra, Advocate Through: Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ...Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State. CRL.A. 163/2013 MAHENDER SINGH Through: ....Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ....Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgement dated 30.11.2012 and order on sentence dated 14.12.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.298/09. The appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Present appeals have been filed by the appellants under Section 374(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and are directed against the impugned judgment dated 30.11.2012 and orde...
Steel Authority of India Ltd. (Sail) Vs. M/S Dampskibsselskabet Norden ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~24 & 25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2015 FAO (OS) 325/2014 & CM No.11483/2014 (stay) STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. (SAIL) .... Appellants versus M/S DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET NORDEN A/S + .....Respondent FAO (OS) 334/2014 M/S DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET NORDEN A/S .... Appellants versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. (SAIL) .....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants For the Respondents : Mr A.K. Ganguli, Sr Advocate with Ms Monika Garg, Advocates and for the respondents in FAO (OS) in 334/2014 : Mr Prashant S. Pratap, Sr Advocate with Mr O.P. Gaggar, Advocates and for the appellants in FAO(OS) 325/2014 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These cross appeals arise from the judgement dated 30.04.2014 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in OMP No.773/2013 which was a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 19...
Manoj Pangotra and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
I-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 30, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1424/2015 MANOJ PANGOTRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ravi Dahiya, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with Inspector Sunder Singh Mr. Deepak Kumar Tyagi, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.434/2014, under Sections 420/467/468/471/ 506/511/120-B of the IPC, registered at police station K.N.Katju Marg, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 in support of this petition. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for respondent-State and Mr. Deepak Kumar Tyagi, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2 Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that petitioners No.1 to 3, present in the Court, Crl....
Kuldeep Sobti Vs. Pahwa Buildtech Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:20.04 2015 Date of Decision:30.04.2015 + CS(OS) 1429/2013 KULDEEP SOBTI Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Arun Khosla and Mr.Shreeanka Kakkar, Advocates. versus PAHWA BUILDTECH PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Dinesh Garg, Ms.Rachna Agrawal and Ms.Uditi Khattar, Advocates for D-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.3268/2014 (leave to defend) 1. This is an application under Order 37 Rule 3 (5) CPC for grant of unconditional leave to defend the suit.2. The accompanying suit is filed for recovery of a sum of Rs.22,02,65,740/- jointly and severally against the defendant. As per the plaint the defendant companies jointly entered into an Agreement to Sell dated 6.3.2011 with Dr. Jawahar Lal Chakravarthy in respect of property No.38/61 West Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi comprising of plot measuring 666.66 sq.yds with superstructure for a total consideration of Rs.28 crores. By 15.6.2011 the defendants had p...
Kamlesh Sethi Vs. Land and Building Department and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1608/2012 KAMLESH SETHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Balvinder Ralhan, Advocate versus LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for R-1 Ms. Latika Dutta, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER % 30.04.2015 1. This is a writ petition filed to seek a direction against the respondent for allotment of an alternate plot. 1.1 It is the petitioners case that her plot was acquired in 1978. The averment made in respect of the relief sought, in the petition, is that, the petitioner was the owner of the property situate in Khasra no.689/109, in Village Sarai Peepli Thala, in Mohindra Park, Block-Z Extension, Delhi, which is now known as Jahangir Puri (in short the property). 1.2 The petitioner, submits that for being allotted an alternate plot, on account of compulsory acquisition of her property, an application was filed with respondent no.1, on 29.07.1978. 1.3 WP(C...
M/S. Arun International Vs. State of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:30. h April, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. NO.1041/2015 & CRL.M.A. NO.3903/2015 M/S. ARUN INTERNATIONAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjay Sethi, Adv. with Mr.Vikrant Arora & Ms. Shilpi Rathore, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through ..... Respondent Mr.Satish Verma, APP for State Mr.Tarun Aggarwal proprietor of Respondent No.2 AND + CRL.M.C. NO.1056/2015 & CRL.M.A. NO.3941/2015 M/S. ARUN INTERNATIONAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjay Sethi, Adv. with Mr.Vikrant Arora & Ms. Shilpi Rathore, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through ..... Respondent Mr.Satish Verma, APP for State Mr.Tarun Aggarwal proprietor of Respondent No.2 AND + CRL.M.C. NO.1057/2015 & CRL.M.A. NO.3943/2015 M/S. ARUN INTERNATIONAL CRL.M.C. 1041/2015, CRL.M.C. 1056/2015 & CRL.M.C. 1057/2015 Through Mr.Sanjay Sethi, Adv. with Mr.Vikrant Arora & Ms. Shilpi Rathore, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through ..... Respondent Mr.Satish Verma, APP for State Mr.Tarun A...
Mahamedha Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Vs. Delhi State Cooperative Bank ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:30. h April, 2015 % + CS(OS) No.2710/2011 MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Rakesh Khanna, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Shiv K.Tyagi, Mr. Virender Singh and Mr. Mohit Nagar, Advs. versus DELHI STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD ....Defendant Through Mr. V.P.Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.M.I.Choudhary and Mr. R.C.Khatri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff bank Ltd. is a Co-operative Society registered under the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965. The defendant bank is a Co-operative Society registered under the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. By letter dated 13th August, 2001 issued by Reserve Bank of India the plaintiff bank was admitted as a sub-member of the New Delhi Bankers Clearing House through the defendant bank, which acted as its Sponsor Bank since 2001 to 4th May, 2009.3. It is state...
Chattar Pal Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 723/2011 Decided on 30th April, 2015 CHATTAR PAL Through: Appellant Mr. Imran Khan, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for State with ASI Devender Kumar, P.S. Uttam Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant has been convicted under Sections 392/394/397/34 IPC by the trial court and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years with fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 394/34 IPC read with Section 397 IPC. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. has been given to the appellant.2. Aggrieved by his conviction and also the sentence awarded to him, appellant has preferred this appeal.3. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant has given up challenge to the conviction under Sections 392/394 IPC. However, he has challenged the conviction...
Parveen Kumar Beniwal Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29th April, 2015. + LPA No.41/2015 PARVEEN KUMAR BENIWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal with Mr. Vipin K. Mittal, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum and Ms. Sana Ansari, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 22nd December, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.8111/2014 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was filed impugning the order dated 6th August, 2014 of the Lt. Governor of Delhi of dismissal / rejection of the appeal under Section 18 of the Arms Act, 1959 preferred by the appellant against the order dated 1st April, 2014 of the Additional Commissioner of Police (ACP) (Licensing) revoking the arms licence of the appellant.2. This appeal came up for admission on 12th February, 2015 when the counsel...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »