Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vishishth Chay Vyapar Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2015 ITA11052010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus VISHISHTH CHAY VYAPAR LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA11062010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus VISHISHTH CHAY VYAPAR LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA11072010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus VISHISHTH CHAY VYAPAR LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the Appellant : Mr Rohit Madan and Mr Ruchir Bhatia. For the Respondent : Mr Ajay Vohra, Sr Adv. with Ms Kavita Jha and Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These appeals, preferred by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act), impugn a common order dated 30.06.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter the Tribunal) to the extent that the appeals preferred by the Revenue (being ITA3763Del/2007, ITA3764Del/2007 and...
Ashok Sharma Vs. Vijay Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 645/2014 & CM APPL. 10883/2014 (Stay) Reserved on:15. h January, 2015 Decided on:30. h April, 2015 % ASHOK SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vikas Gautam, Advocate. versus VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.P. Thareja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The Petitioner filed a petition bearing No.10/2008 titled as Ashok Sharma vs. Vijay Kumar Gupta on 18th November, 2008 under Section 14 (1) (a) read with Section 26 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) for eviction of the Respondent on the ground of nonpayment of rent in respect of a shop in premises bearing No.27/2, Shakti Nagar, Delhi-110007. In the eviction petition, it was stated that the Petitioner let out the tenanted premises to the Respondent on rent @Rs.363/per month. Respondent was a continuous defaulter in payment of the rent and was in arrears of rent w.e.f. 1st October, 2005. Despite receiving the legal ...
State Vs. Satish
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1236/2013 Judgment Reserved On:5. h February 2015 Judgment Delivered On:30. h April 2015 SAT PRAKASH @ LALA Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Chowdhary, Advocate Versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through : Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State AND + CRL.A. 1210/2014 STATE Appellant Through: Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Versus Respondent SATISH Through: Mr Naveen Gaur and Mr Abhijeet Bhagat, Advocates AND + CRL.A. 119/2015 MAHESH Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Mr. Rohit Arora, Crl. Appeal No.1236/2013 Crl. Appeal No.1210/2014 Mr. Ajay Kumar Pipaniya and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocates Versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J CRL.A. 1236/2013 & CRL.A. 119/2015 1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 18.07.2013 and order on sentence dated 30.07.2013 pa...
Akash Rajput Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
I-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 30, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1175/2015 AKASH RAJPUT Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mahesh Kumar Gautam, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Devender Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No.359/2013, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, Delhi in this petition. Terms of settlement stand recorded in the order of 22 nd March, 2014 before the learned matrimonial court. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by ASI Devender Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M...
Mahender Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +CRL.A. 107/2013 Judgment reserved on 23.02.2015 % Judgment delivered on 30th April, 2015 KALICHARAN Appellant Mr. Sameer Chandra, Advocate Through: Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ...Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State. CRL.A. 163/2013 MAHENDER SINGH Through: ....Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ....Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgement dated 30.11.2012 and order on sentence dated 14.12.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.298/09. The appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. Present appeals have been filed by the appellants under Section 374(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and are directed against the impugned judgment dated 30.11.2012 and orde...
Mahesh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1236/2013 Judgment Reserved On:5. h February 2015 Judgment Delivered On:30. h April 2015 SAT PRAKASH @ LALA Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Chowdhary, Advocate Versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Respondent Through : Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State AND + CRL.A. 1210/2014 STATE Appellant Through: Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Versus Respondent SATISH Through: Mr Naveen Gaur and Mr Abhijeet Bhagat, Advocates AND + CRL.A. 119/2015 MAHESH Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Mr. Rohit Arora, Crl. Appeal No.1236/2013 Crl. Appeal No.1210/2014 Mr. Ajay Kumar Pipaniya and Mr. Arjun Singh, Advocates Versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Firoz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J CRL.A. 1236/2013 & CRL.A. 119/2015 1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 18.07.2013 and order on sentence dated 30.07.2013 pa...
Dharmender Pandey @ Chanchal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~05. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 615/2013 Judgment dated 30th April 2015 % DHARMENDER PANDEY @ CHANCHAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr.R.M. Tufail, Mr.Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Mr.Anwar A. Khan and Mr.Farooq Choudhry, Advs. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State along with Inspr. Mohinder and SI Dhirender, P.S. Ali Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 8.3.2013 and order on sentence dated 14.3.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge-NDPS, Rohini Courts, New Delhi, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine the appellant has been directed to undergo...
Prof. a.K. Mittal Vs. Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6059/2014 PROF. A.K. MITTAL Through: Petitioner in person ..... Petitioner versus REGISTRAR, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Gourab Banerjee, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Mitra, Mr.Sahil Tagotra and Ms. Charu Ambwani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER % 30.04.2015 CM No.17178/2014 (for recalling the order dated 15.09.2014) 1. Yesterday, a detailed hearing was held in the matter when, the petitioner was represented by advocates, Messrs Chandra Shekhar and Mr. Udit Arora. 1.1 Today, quite strangely the advocates, despite being told that the matter will be taken up, to basically, enable Mr. Banerjee, the learned senior counsel for the respondent to revert with instructions, have decided to remain absent. The petitioner, who is present in person insists that he would like to argue the matter.2. I have heard the petitioner in person in some detail, as also Mr. Banerjee in suppo...
M/S Shivnandan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~28 and 29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:30. 04.2015 W.P.(C) 6265/2013 and 6326/2013 M/S SHIVNANDAN BUILDCON PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR ..... Respondents AND M/S OMSHIV BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondents : Mr Parag Tipathi, Sr Advocate with Mr Kunal Bahri and Mr Ankit Verma, Advocates : Mr N.P.Sahni, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These two writ petitions raise a common issue and, therefore, are being taken up together. The facts of W.P.(C) No.6265/2013 shall be referred to.2. The assessment year concerned in both the petitions is assessment year 2009-10. The present writ petitions are preferred against the orders passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 264 of...
Neeraj Kumar Legha Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 30, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1550/2015 NEERAJ KUMAR LEGHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.N. Rawal, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Vivek Malik Respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.340/2006, under Sections 336/338/387 of IPC registered at police station Vasant Kunj, New Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of respondents No.2 & 3-complainant party of the FIR in question. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice submits that respondents No.2 &3, present in the Court, have been identified to be the injured persons/ complainant party of the FIR in question by SI Vivek Malik on the basis of identity proof produced by them. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor CRL.M.C. 1550/2015 Page 1 for Sta...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »