Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prit Pal Singh Vs. Ramesh Kumar Dora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:23. d April, 2015 % + RC. Rev. No.444/2012 PRIT PAL SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Shyam Moorjani, Adv. with Mr.Sidharth Joshi, Adv. versus RAMESH KUMAR DORA Through ..... Respondent Mr.Dinesh Agnani, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Rajiv Kr. Sharma & Mr.Prateek Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.C.M. No.7696/2014 (under Section 5 of the Limitation Act) This is an application filed by the respondent/review petitioner under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay of 43 days in filing the review petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer is allowed and the delay in filing the review petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. R.P. No.199/2014 (for review of order dated 6th January, 2014) 1. This Court while coming to the conclusion had observed in the order dated 6th January, 2014 that the petitioner has been able to raise prima-facie triable issues and the...
Sushila Agarwal Vs. Parshotam Sarup Aggarwal and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2015
$~A-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 23, 2015 + CS(OS) No.1290/2011 SUSHILA AGARWAL Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Jayant K.Mehta and Mr.Saurabh Dev Karan Singh, Advocates versus PARSHOTAM SARUP AGGARWAL AND ANR ..... Defendant Through Ms.Tamali Wad and Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates for D-1 & D-4 Mr.D.P.Mohanty, Mr.Sumit Goel and Mr.Ritesh Isaac, Advocates for D-2 Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr.P.K.Rawal, Mr.Ajay Bahl and Mr.Tarun Agarwal, Advocates for D-3A and 3B CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) IA No.19978/2014 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC for directions to the defendants to allow the plaintiff to place her generators either in the rear service lane behind flats No.M-36-38, ground floor of the property or on the terrace above the second floor of the flats. The plaintiff and the defendants are the descendants of late Sh. Ram Sarup Aggarwal. The suit relates to Plot No.12, Bl...
Gurcharan Singh Vs. Saraswati Mishra and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2015
$~A-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. 04.2015 + CS(OS) 821/2012 GURCHARAN SINGH Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.V.P.Rana, Advocate versus SARASWATI MISHRA & ORS ..... Defendant Through Mr.Dinesh Garg and Ms.Uditi Khattar, Advocates for D-1 & D-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.5789/2012 & 2808/2014 1. IA No.5789/2012 is filed by the plaintiff seeking ad interim injunction. This application came up for hearing on 13.4.2012 when this Court passed an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the defendant No.3 from creating any third party interest in respect of suit property, i.e.agricultural land measuring 20 Bighas, 8 Biswas comprising in Khasra No.47/16 (4-16), 46/21(4-16), 20 (4-16), 19 (4-16), 22/1 (0-4), 22/2Min (1-0) situated at village Rafipur, Ranhola, New Delhi till further orders. IA No.2808/2014 is filed by defendant No.3 under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint read with Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacati...
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Vs. United Distributors I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d April, 2015 % + LPA No.659/2014 FOOD SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .. Appellant Through: Mr. Mehmood Pracha with Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advs. Versus DANISCO (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arjun Pall, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Akshay Makhija, Adv. for R2/UOI. AND + LPA No.711/2014 FOOD SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .. Appellant Through: Mr. Mehmood Pracha with Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advs. Versus UNITED DISTRIBUTORS INCORPORATION & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Virag Gupta, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Sonia Sharma & Mr. V.C. Jha, Ms. Neha Sharma, Advs. for R-3. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These two intra-court appeals though against different judgments (of the same learned Single Judge), but both concerning interpretation of the provisions of The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSS Act) and Rules and R...
Food Safety and Standards Authority of India Vs. Danisco (India) Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d April, 2015 % + LPA No.659/2014 FOOD SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .. Appellant Through: Mr. Mehmood Pracha with Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advs. Versus DANISCO (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ANR. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arjun Pall, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Akshay Makhija, Adv. for R2/UOI. AND + LPA No.711/2014 FOOD SAFETY & STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .. Appellant Through: Mr. Mehmood Pracha with Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advs. Versus UNITED DISTRIBUTORS INCORPORATION & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Virag Gupta, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Sonia Sharma & Mr. V.C. Jha, Ms. Neha Sharma, Advs. for R-3. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These two intra-court appeals though against different judgments (of the same learned Single Judge), but both concerning interpretation of the provisions of The Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSS Act) and Rules and R...
Gaurav Rishi and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d April, 2015 % + LPA No.132/2015 .. Appellants Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, & Mr. Hariharan, Sr. Advs. with Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Adv. GAURAV RISHI & ANR. Through: Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Pradeep Sharma, CGP and Mr. Kunal Punj, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) & Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for R-2,4, 5 to 8 (Delhi Police & Licensing Authority) Mr. Vijay Joshi, Adv. for R-3/SDMC. Mr. K.V. Vishvanathan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Ms. Jasleen Oberoi, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. s.M. Bhaskar, Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Mr. Abhimanyu Chopra & Ms. Adiba, Advs. for R-9. Insp. Anant Kumar, P.S. S.J.Enclave. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 27th October, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of disposal of W.P.(C) No.2187/2014 ...
Vijay Pal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : April 22, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2962/2015 VIJAY PAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The writ petitioner questions the legality of the posting order dated February 07, 2015 under which the petitioner has been posted to the State of Jammu & Kashmir. The posting order is a routine posting order and embraces apart from the petitioner many other persons.2. The petitioner has two strings in the bow.3. The first string is the transfer policy dated May 12, 2011 under which the petitioner claims that he has a right to be in Delhi for a period of four years. We note that the current place of posting of the petitioner is at Delhi. The second string in the bow is the plea of equity based ...
Imran @ Akhlakh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d April, 2015 + CRL.A. 1351/2013 IMRAN @ AKHLAKH Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Riaz Mohd., Advocate. versus STATE Through : + CRL.A. 553/2014 AASH MOHD. @ ASHU Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State. ..... Appellant Mr. K.N. Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Complainant Ganga Ram Jat was running a garment business at X/234, Gali No.0, Ram Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi. On 8th November, 2009, he was present in his shop when at about 7:30 pm, two boys entered the shop armed with knife and country made pistol and pulled down the shutter of the shop. He was robbed of approximately Rs.2,50,000/-, bank drafts worth Rs.6.5 lacs, his gold ring and mobile. Thereafter his hands were tied. On hearing the knock at the shutter, they opened the shutter and found Hanuman Prasad, employee of the com...
Hari Om Sharan Dwivedi Vs. National Accreditation Board for Education ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3959/2015 HARI OM SHARAN DWIVEDI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Yash Mishra & Mr Shashwat Tripathi, Advs. versus % NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR EDUCATION AND TRAINING & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Vikas Chopra, Adv. for R- 1 & 2. Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER2204.2015 CM No.7073/2015 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. WP(C) 3959/2015 & CM No.7072/2015 (Stay) 2. In the present writ petition, in effect, challenge is laid to communication dated 28.01.2015. 2.1 This challenge is, broadly made, in the background of the judgement of a Single Judge of this court dated 07.11.2013, passed in a batch of writ petitions, the lead petition being WP(C) No.3141/2012, titled: Mahendra Pandey & Anr. vs Secretary, Ministry of Environment & Forests & Ors. 2.2 Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioners in that matter succeeded, albeit partially, to the exten...
Ajay Suryavanshi and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
$~8 & 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : April 22, 2015 W.P.(C) 1611/2015 AJAY SURYAVANSHI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr.M.Tapan Sharma, Advocate for R-3 and R-4 W.P.(C) 3046/2015 S. RAVI CHANDRAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Rekha Palli, Advocate with Ms.Ankita Patnaik and Mr.Nikhil Palli, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Rishi Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Whereas W.P.(C) No.1611/2015 has been filed by officers of BSF in Group A service, W.P.(C) No.3046/2015 has been filed by officers in BSF in the ministerial cadre. The commonality in the two petitions is the desire of the petitioners for a cadre revi...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »