Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raja Ram and Ors. Vs. State (Delhi Admn) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
I- 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5403/2014 RAJA RAM & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate versus STATE (DELHI ADMN) & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Ajay Kumar Mr. Rahul, Advocate with respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.865/2014, under Section 307/34 of IPC, registered at police station Dabri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 13th October, 2014 (Annexure-P-2) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State has placed on record status report which discloses that in pursuance to the order Sessions Court of 17 th October, 2014, the offence in the FIR in question stands altered from Section 307 of the IPC Crl.M.C.No.5403/20...
Virender Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1451/2015 & Crl.M.As.5347/2015 VIRENDER KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh K. Daksh and Mr. Sumeet Kaushal, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Surender Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.409/2012 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Bindapur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 14th February, 2013 (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Surender Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 1451/2015 Page 1 Respondent No.2, pres...
Dr. N Siva Krishna Vs. National Board of Examination and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2015 W.P.(C) 4111/2015 DR. N SIVA KRISHNA ..... Petitioner versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Lalit Kumar and Mr Aditya Kumar. For the Respondents : Dr Rakesh Gosain for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning National Board of Examinations Leave Rules (hereafter NBE Leave Rules) as applicable to Diplomate of National Board (hereafter DNB) trainees. The petitioner, inter alia, prays as under:a) issue directions, orders or writ including the writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the entire NBE Leave Rules applicable to DNB (Diplomate of National Board) trainees contained under Annexure P1herein. b) issue directions, orders or writ including the writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent no.1 to 4 to de...
Sunil Bakhru and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1158/2015 SUNIL BAKHRU & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. Naseem Akhtar and Ms. Suparna Sinha, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Kuldeep Singh Dr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.118/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Maya Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms are reflected in the joint statement of petitionerhusband and respondent No.2-wife made before the concerned Mahila Court on 19th February, 2014. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Dr. Amarjit Singh, Advocate, accepts CRL.M.C. 1158/2015 Page 1 notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Pub...
Surender @ Sunder and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1657/2015 & Crl.M.A.6020/2015 SURENDER @ SUNDER & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Narender Sangwan, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Jasbir Singh Malik Ms. Ritu Sangwan, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.229/2010, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at police station Ranhola, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Ms. Ritu Sangwan, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be CRL.M.C. 1657/2015 Page 1 complainant/first-informant o...
Umesh Kumar Mehto and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1648/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.6005/2015 UMESH KUMAR MEHTO & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anoop Kumar & Md. Ali, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shailendra Kr. Singh PS Khajuri Khas Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.209/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th June, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by SI Crl.M.C.No.1648/2015 Pag...
Mahender Singh Vs. Chanda Chawla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
$~43. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IN THE MATTER OF: MAHENDER SINGH CS(OS) 2204/2013 Decided on :24. 04.2015 ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate versus CHANDA CHAWLA ..... Defendant Through : Mr. Rohit Puri with Ms. Akanksha and Mr. Aditya Chibbar, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff praying inter alia for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 5.1.2012, executed in respect of a plot of land bearing No.C-12-B, measuring 240 sq. yards out of a total area of 1400 sq. yards, comprised in Khasra No.271, situated in the revenue estate of village Sahibabad Daulatpur, commonly known as Block C Prehlad Vihar, Delhi, with directions to the defendant to handover the vacant peaceful possession of the subject plot and execute a sale deed/conveyance deed in respect thereof. In the alternative, the plaintiff seeks a decree for recovery of `50.00 lacs as damages against t...
Ntpc Ltd Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:24. 04.2015 FAO(OS) 219/2015 NTPC LTD ... Appellant versus PATEL ENGINEERING LTD ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondents : Mr Tushar Mehta, ASG with Mr Tarkeshwar Nath, Mr B. K. Pandey and Mr Saurabh Kumar : Mr Dayan Krishnan, Sr Advocate with Mr Rishi Agrawala, Ms Aayushi Sharma Khazandri, Ms Manvi and Mr Karan Luthra CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CAV3922015 The learned counsel for the respondent/ caveator is present. The caveat stands discharged. CM74892015 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 219/2015 & CM74882015 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21.02.2015 delivered by a learned Single Judge of this Court on a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The said petition was filed by t...
Anil Kumar Verma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
$~R-27. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:24. 04.2015 CRL. A. 148/2009 ANIL KUMAR VERMA Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Davender Kumar, Advocate STATE ..... Respondent Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney, APP Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.01.2009 passed by the Special Judge, Delhi in CC No.145/08, titled State V. Anil Kumar Verma arising out of FIR No.12/2001 under Section 7 & 13 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the Act), whereby the appellant was convicted of the offences under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) punishable under Section 13(2) of the Act, and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs.2500/- under Section 7 of the Act, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of three months. In respect of conviction under Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2), he was sentenced to un...
M/S Ravi Crop Science Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d April, 2015 % + LPA1362014 M/S RAVI CROP SCIENCE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.G.R. Khattar, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Roshan Lal Goel & Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. S.K. Dubey with MS. Sushma Yadav & Mr. Vikram Singh, Advs. for R-2/DRI. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 20 th December, 2013 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) no.7449/2012 filed by the appellant to the extent the same, while directing the release of the amount deposited in the bank account of the appellant with the respondent no.3 Citibank after the date the same was frozen at the instance of the respondent no.2 Addl. Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), makes the same subject to the appellant furnishing a bank guarantee to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »