Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajendra Singh Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. h April, 2015 Date of Decision:27. h April, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 5168/2013 RAJENDRA SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.S. Garia, Advocate versus STATE BANK OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to set aside the award dated 23.04.2013, passed in ID No.52/2011 by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) whereby the Tribunal dismissed the claim statement of the petitioner, being premature.2. Brief facts of the case as borne out from the petition are that the petitioner was suspended on 08.12.2006 on account of alleged misappropriation of funds from customers account and memo of charges were issued on 12.11.2007 and 04.06.2008 for unauthorized debiting of customers acco...
Renu Barrot Vs. The Directorate of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6180/2013 27th April, 2015 % RENU BARROT Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.M.A.Niyazi with Ms.Anamika Niyazi and Mr.Manish Kumar, Advocates. versus THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Bandana Shukla, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for R- 2 & 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. I must commence this judgment with certain observations qua Army Public Schools and the Army Welfare Education Society which runs these Army Public Schools. These strong observations which I am making I am constrained to make against the Army Public Schools and the Army Welfare Education Society. Similar observations have already been made by me against the Army Public Schools and Army Welfare Education Society in various other writ petitions, and which observations I was forced to make because Army Public Schools and Army Welfare Education So...
Jaivir Singh Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 04.2015 WP(C) No.4092/2015 & CM No.7320/2015 JAIVIR SINGH .... Petitioner versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Raman Kapur, Sr Advocate with Mr Aviral Tiwari, Advocates. Ms Renu Gupta, Advocates for respondent Nos.1 & 2. For the Respondent No.1&2 : CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that he has been found to be disqualified for not meeting the technical criteria specified in the subject tender for hiring of Mini Jetting/Pressure Spray Machine(s) mounted on Mahindra Bolero/Tata 207 or equivalent vehicle with driver, operator/Beldar and with all accessories and machineries etc. required for jetting/pressure spray of water by the machine on day-to-day basis to clean the public conveniences for minimum ...
Sunita Prem John Vs. Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8474/2011 27th April, 2015 % SUNITA PREM JOHN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. C.S. Parashar, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Ashwani K. Sakhuja, Advocate with Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was decided in favour of the petitioner on 3.12.2013 on merits by a detailed judgment running into 14 pages. This writ petition had come up for the first time for hearing on 2.12.2011 and thereafter decided after two years in terms of the judgment dated 3.12.2013. By the judgment dated 3.12.2013 the petitioner, a poor employee of the respondent no.2/School, and who was appointed as a maid, was held entitled to the relief of her services being continued as regular with the respondent no.2/School and not ...
Saroj Arora and Ors Vs. Mohinder Pal and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :27. h April,2015 + FAO3202010 SAROJ ARORA & ORS ..... Appellants Through Ms.Deepika V. Marwaha, Adv. versus MOHINDER PAL & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. Ajay Bahl, Adv. CM(M) 1105/2010 SAROJ ARORA & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Adv. versus MOHINDER PAL & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Ajay Bahl, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This order shall dispose of CM(M) No.1105/2010 and FAO No.320/2010 both titled as Saroj Arora & Ors. v. Mohinder Pal & Ors. It may be pertinent here to mention that both the present CM(M) and the appeal are against the order dated 09.06.2010 by virtue of which the FAO No.320/2010 & CM (M) No.1105/2010 Page 1 petitioner was granted a sum of Rs.20,000/- by way of interim orders during the pendency of the suit and by the same order the court had observed that a receiver shall be deemed to have been appointed. However, no receiver was subsequent thereto appoint...
Tushar Ranjan Mohanty Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of hearing and Order:27. 04.2015 + W.P.(C) 4177/2015 TUSHAR RANJAN MOHANTY ..... Petitioner Through Petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. R.V. Sinha & Mr. R.N. Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER KAILASH GAMBHIR, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.7570/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.4177/2015 1. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 27.07.2010 passed by the learned Tribunal in O.A. No.2359/2009, order dated 03.02.2010 in M.A. No.301/2010 and M.A. No.302/2010 in O.A. No.2359/2009, order dated 30.09.2010 in R.A. No.250/2010 in O.A. No.2359/2009, and the order dated 05.09.2014 in M.A. No.601/2012 and M.A. No.2150/2012 in O.A. No.2359/2009. The petitioner in the present writ petition has also sought certain other directions against the respondents in terms of ...
Maple Solutions Ltd. Vs. Bank of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: April 27, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4169/2015, C.M. No.7553-7554/2015 MAPLE SOLUTIONS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Sanjay, Advocate. versus BANK OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. JItendra Kumar with Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner seeks to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India essentially to challenge the sale of the subject property (mortgaged property) through auction held by the first respondent bank on 20.09.2012 in favour of the second respondent (auction purchaser), in the wake of proceedings earlier taken out under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the SARFAESI Act). The petitioner prays for the issuance of writ in the n...
Commissioner of Income Tax-I Vs. Accession Buildwell (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :27. 04.2015 ITA1532014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IAppellant Through: Sh. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Abhimanyu Lamba, Sh. Mayank Nagi, Sh. Tarandeep Singh and Sh. Tarun Singh, Advocates. Versus ACCESSION BUILDWELL (P) LTD. ..Respondent Through: Sh. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Shikhar Garg and Sh. Mukul Mathur, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. Two questions of law are sought to be urged by the Revenue, in its appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) directed against the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for assessment year (AY) 2008-09 (i.e. ITA No.2001/Del/2012, decided on 09.09.2013): (i) Whether the ITAT was justified in the eyes of the law in treating the interest income of `77,25,153/- on the FDR's as part of its business income?. ITA1532014 Page 1 (ii) Whethe...
Ame De Verre (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Trade and Taxes
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 06, 2015 Pronounced on: April 24, 2015 + ST.APPL. 21/2013 AME DE VERRE (P) LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Tarun Gulati, Mr.Sparsh Bhargava and Mr.Shashi Mathews, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan, ASC for GNCTD and Ms.Latika Dutta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. This appeal under Section 81 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as DVAT Act) assails the order dated 17.8.2012 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Value Added Tax (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in appeal No.379/ATVAT/06-07 whereby the view taken by the Commissioner, Trade and Taxes, Govt. of NCT Delhi (Commissioner, for short) in order dated 15.7.2009 was upheld and the goods sold by the appellant-assessee under the brand name of Baldi were held to be such as cannot be categorized as Handicrafts with...
S.P. Mehra Vs. Syndicate Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-24-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3942/1999 and W.P.(C) 3061/2000 Reserved on:20. h April, 2015 Pronounced on:24. h April, 2015 % W.P.(C) No.3942/1999 S.P. MEHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Pallvi Deepika, Advocates Versus SYNDICATE BANK AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jagat Arora, Advocate W.P.(C) 3061/2000 S.P. MEHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Pallvi Deepika, Advocates Versus SYNDICATE BANK AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jagat Arora, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who was an employee of the respondent No.1/Bank impugns the order passed by the departmental authority/Disciplinary Authority dated 19.7.1999 imposing the punishment of dismissal from service.2. Against the petitioner a charge-sheet dated 30.3.1998 was issued in whi...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »