Delhi Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Praveen Kumar @ Kanhaiya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : APRIL, 07, 2015 DECIDED ON : APRIL27 2015 + CRL.A.924/2012 PRAVEEN KUMAR @ KANHAIYA Through : ..... Appellant S.B.Dandapani, Advocate. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin Kumar Jha, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 16.05.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.110/2011 arising out of FIR No.244/11 registered with Police Station Sagarpur by which the appellant Praveen Kumar @ Kanhaiya was convicted under Section 376 IPC, he has filed the instant appeal. By an order dated 22.05.2012, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine `5,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant, as projected in the charge- sheet were that on 06.10.2011 at about 05.00 a.m. at CN-94, Jhuggi Near Gali No.7, East Sagarpur, Delhi, he committed rape upon prosecutrix X(assumed name). Intimation about the incident was given to the police and DD No.13B (Ex.PW-19/A) came into exi...
K.K. Verma and Ors. Vs. University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3147/2007 27th April, 2015 % K.K. VERMA AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Usman Ali, Advocate. Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocate for petitioner No.2. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saurabh Banerjee, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Arjun Harkauli, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks identical reliefs which were sought in W.P.(C) No.3583/2007 titled as Sh. Jagdish Parsad & Ors. Vs. University of Delhi & Ors. The writ petition in the case of Sh. Jagdish Prasad & Ors. (supra) as also this writ petition was decided in terms of the judgment passed by this Court on 21.10.2013 and which was set aside by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.2.2015 in LPA No.712/2014 alongwith connected cases and this Court was ...
the Management of M.C.D Vs. Praveen Kumar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6372/2002 Judgment reserved on:20. 04.2015 Judgement pronounced on:27. 04.2015 THE MANAGEMENT OF M.C.D ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Bhaskar for Ms.Shyel Trehan, Advocate. versus PRAVEEN KUMAR & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajiv Agarwal and Mr.Sachin Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the award dated 06.07.2001 whereby the learned Presiding Officer has held that the workman was entitled to be appointed on the post of computer operator w.e.f. 29th March, 95 in the proper pay-scale of computer operator and other consequential benefits and also awarded Rs.1000/- towards cost of litigation.2. The admitted facts of the present case are that respondent No.1, Mr.Praveen Kumar, was working with the management. He joined the employment of the MCD in its Engineering Department at Division No.25, Under Fly Over, Sewa Nagar, New Delhi on 15.04.8...
Narender Jain and Ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 04.2015 W.P.(C) 2913/2014 & CM No.6035/2014 ONIKA MEHROTRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 3048/2014 & CM No.6377/2014 NARENDER JAIN & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 3051/2014 & CM No.6381/2014 SURENDER SOLANKI & ORS. ..... Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the Petitioners : Mr A.S. Chandihok, Sr. Advocate with Mr Anil Amrit and Mr N. Tripathi in W.P.(C) 2913/2014. Mr Amit Gupta and Mr Anant A. Pavgi in W.P.(C) 3048/2014 & W.P.(C) 3051/2014. For the Respondents : Mr Subodh Kumar with Dr Kanchan Chawla for R- 1 in W.P.(C) 2913/2014. Mr Laliet Kumar and Mr Vipin Malik for R-2 in W.P.(C) 2913/2014. Mr Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Mr Biji Rajesh, Mr Rajeev Yadav, Mr Anchit Sharma, Mr Abhay Pratap Singh for MCD in W.P.(C) 3048/2014 ...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Knr-Patel (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 51/2014 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapoor with Mr. Anil Kapoor, Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocates. versus M/S KNR-PATEL (JV) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit George with Ms. Rajsree Ajay, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 27.04.2015 1. The Petitioner, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), is by this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), challenging the impugned Award dated 8th August 2013 passed by the majority award of the Arbitral Tribunal (AT).2. The contract entered into between the NHAI and the Respondent, M/s. KNR-Patel (JV) was regarding the rehabilitation and upgradation of existing 2 lane road to 4/6 lane divided carriageway configuration of NH-5 in the State of Andhra Pradesh from km 178 to km. 220 (Nellore to Kavali). The contract being a unit rate contract, the bidding documents contained a detailed document Bill of Qu...
Ram Lakhan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h April, 2015 CRL.A. 1355/2011 RAM LAKHAN ..... Appellant Through: versus Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP along with SI Sumer Chand, PS Nabi Karim CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 30.04.2011 and 03.05.2011 in Sessions Case No.92/09 arising out of FIR No.134/08 Police Station Nabi Karim, Delhi under Sections 376 IPC vide which the appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of eight (8) years and fine of Rs.10,000/-; in default thereof, one year simple imprisonment.2. Succinctly stated, the prosecution case is as follows.3. On 11.09.2008, on receipt of DD No.23A, Sub Inspector Vijay Kumar alongwith Constable Suresh and Lady Constable Mukesh reached near Jindal Hotel, Nabi Karim where they came to know that the victi...
Anil Ahuja and Anr. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
I-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1709/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.6168/2015 ANIL AHUJA & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Suhail Ahuja, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Pramod Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.236/2010, under Section 324/34 of IPC registered at police station Patel Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 23rd March, 2015 (Annexure- C) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by SI Pramod Kuma...
Harbhajan Singh and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1718/2015 HARBHAJAN SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. A.S. Mann, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Md. Haroon Ms. Rajshri Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2-Rajender Kaur in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.550/2006, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 17th February, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that due to typographical error, the name of respondent No.2 has been mentioned in memo of parties as Mamta instead of Smt. Rajender Kaur. However, the name of respondent No.2 figures as Smt. Rajender Kaur in the petition. CRL.M.C. 1718/2015 Page 1 Notice. Mr. Karan Sin...
Mahinder Nagpal Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27th April, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 8658/2011 MAHINDER NAGPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Mohan Vidhani & Mr.Rahul Vidhani, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Vivek Goyal, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr.Dipak Kumar Jena & Mr.Jaladhar Das, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to issue certificate of registration of trade mark to the petitioner in respect of the trade mark application No.541927 in class 3 which was filed on 14.12.1990 and advertised in the trade mark journal No.1090 at page 1062.2. The facts of the case as emerging from the petition are that the petitioner alongwith his erstwhile partner namely Mrs. Kamlesh Nagpal, trading as TONI INTERNATIONAL filed an application for the registration of the trade mark EVANI und...
Puneet Hada Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2015
I-27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1706/2015 PUNEET HADA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jaswinder Singh Nischal, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Sonu Mr. Vikas Tomar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.208/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement, terms of which stands recorded in the joint statement of parties recorded before the Family Courts on 29th August, 2014 (Annexure-A2). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Vikas Tomar , Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Crl.M.C.No.1706/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respond...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »