Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms.Sarita Tiwari and Anr. Vs. M/S Ganga International School and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.6456/2014 2nd March, 2015 MS.SARITA TIWARI & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate. versus M/S GANGA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Akhil Sibal and Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocates for R-1 and 2. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, two petitioners, seek the relief of being granted by their erstwhile employer/respondent no.1/school, monetary emoluments as per the 6 th Central Pay Commission Report which became applicable to schools in terms of the circular of the Directorate of Education dated 11.2.2009.2. It is an admitted fact that petitioner no.1 worked in the respondent no.1-school till 31.3.2009 and petitioner no.2 worked in the respondent no.1-school till 3.2.2009. Both the petitioners resigned f...
Subhash Chandra Agrawal Vs. Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 6751/2013 SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER COOPERATIVE LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 824/2014 DR. M HAROON SIDDIQUI ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN FARMERS FERTALISER COOPERATIVE LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Ramesh K. Mishra for Mr Prashant Bhushan in W.P.(C) 6751/2013. Mr Prashant Chandra Sen with Ms Ankita Saikia and Mr Rohit Kumar in W.P.(C) 824/2014 For the Respondent : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rajiv Bansal, and Mr Aman Nandrajog for IFFCO. Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6751/2013. Mr Sanjeev Narula (CGSC) and Mr Ajay Kalra for UOI (R-2 & R-3) in W.P.(C) 824/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning a common order dated 05.08.2013 (hereafter impugned order) passed by the Central...
Seema Sapra Vs. General Electric Co. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1280/2012 Reserved on:3. d February, 2015 Pronounced on:2. d March, 2015 % SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R-5/UOI. Mr. N.Ganpathy with Mr.Manpreet Lamba, Adv. for R-1, 6 and 7. ` Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. with Ms. Honey Kolawar, Adv. for Ministry of Railways. Ms. Firdouse Qutbwani Adv. for R13. Mr.Vikram Dhokalia, Advocate for R-16. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J1 This writ petition, which is essentially in two parts qua the causes of action and reliefs claimed, can be in one way disposed of by a very short judgment, because, the first part/aspect and the reliefs claimed with respect thereto of challenge to the 2010 tender process of Railways for setting up manufacturing units for diesel and electric locomotive tenders has bec...
Ashok Rawat and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2262/2014 ASHOK RAWAT & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Petitioner No.1 in person versus THE STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Rajneesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.259/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Sagar Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 17th May, 2013 (Annexure P-2). Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Rajneesh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved vide aforesaid Memorandum of Understandi...
M.C.D. Vs. Rajni Sharma and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4177/2002 % Judgement reserved on:12. 02.2015 Judgement pronounced on:02. 03.2015 M.C.D. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Shyel Trehan and Ms Tejaswi Shetty, Advs. versus RAJNI SHARMA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal and Ms.Neelam Tiwari, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the award dated 16.04.2001, passed in ID No.14/1998 by the Industrial Tribunal. Vide this award, the Industrial Tribunal has held that Kumari Rajni Sharma (hereinafter referred to as the workman) is entitled to be reinstated as LDC/Typist instead of Beldar in terms of award dated 09.10.1995, passed by Shri Nepal Singh, in ID No.105/88.2. The brief history of the case is that the workman was in the employment of the petitioner. She had been appointed as a muster roll/ daily rated/casual worker with effect from 10.06.1986. Her services were terminated with effect from 18.08...
Deepak Kawatra and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 829/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3125/2015 DEEPAK KAWATRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohinder Madan, Advocate for petitioner No.1 Mr. Deepak Kawatra, Advocate for petitioner No.2 versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Govind Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.340/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Uttam Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of settlement of 5th March, 2014 reached between the parties. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State accepts notice and Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Crl.M.C.No.829/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecuto...
Lalit Kumar Chaudhary Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 02, 2015 W.P.(C) 1853/2015 LALIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Sunil Dalal Advocate for UOI W.P.(C) 1854/2015 ABHISHEK YADAV Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Sunil Dalal Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The two above captioned writ petitions came up for preliminary hearing on February 27, 2015 and were adjourned for today to enable learned counsel for the respondents to obtain instructions whether any statement of fact pleaded in the writ petition needed a rebuttal, for if no statement of fact made in the writ petition needed a rebuttal, the only question which arose ...
Deepak Kumar and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 807/2015 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Abhikant Dureja, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Bhagmal Singh Mr. O.P.Aggarwal, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.148/2013, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station DBG Road, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 26th October, 2013 (Annexure-B). Notice. Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. O.P.Aggarwal, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first- Crl.M.C.No.807/2015 Page 1 informant of the FIR in question and she ...
Raj Kumar and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 823/2015 RAJ KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Abhikant Dureja, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Inderpal Mr. Amar Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.191/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Rajouri Garden, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 15th October, 2013 (Annexure-B), arrived at Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Amar Singh, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/firstCrl.M.C.No.823/2015 P...
All India State Bank Backward Classes Staff Union Vs. Union of India a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2454/1998 2nd March, 2015 % ALL INDIA STATE BANK BACKWARD CLASSES STAFF UNION AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners seek the relief of issuance of a writ of mandamus etc for quashing of the notification of the respondent no.2 dated 18.3.1998 for promotion from Award Staff to that of the Junior Management Grade Scale-I (JMGS-I) on the basis of test and interview to be held on 24.5.1998. Quashing is sought of the notification and the selection process on the ground that the petitioners, SC candidates, are entitled to two years relaxation in seniority, but which relaxation has not been given.2. In my opinion, the writ petition would not be maintain...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »