Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunny Arora and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 814/2015 SUNNY ARORA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Suresh Sisodia, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Subhash Mr. Kamal Khurana, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.No.3074/2015 (u/S5of The Limitatio Act, 1963) For reasons stated in the application, delay of 49 days in re-filing the accompanying petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 814/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3075/2015 Quashing of FIR No.156/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of The Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated Settlement-Compromise Deed of 30th August, 2013. Notice. Crl.M.C.No.814/2015 Page 1 Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for ...
Supreme Infrastructure India Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India and A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:12. h February, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:02. d March, 2015 % + WP(C) 8517/2014 & CM Nos.19676/2014, 21025/2014 SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. ....Appellants versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants: Mr Aman Lekhi, Sr Advocate with Mr Puneet Tanjea & Ms Kopal Shrivastava For the Respondent: Mr Jaswinder Singh CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner (Supreme Infrastructure India Limited) has impugned the letter dated 07.11.2014 issued by the respondent No.2 rejecting the eligibility bid of the petitioner and for a direction to consider the bid of the petitioner for the project Construction of Additional office Complex for the Supreme Court of India adjoining =============================================================== Pragati Maidan, New Delhi : Package-III plus b...
Dharamvir Sharma Vs. Fena Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. h February, 2015 Date of Decision:02. d March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 2619/2011 DHARAMVIR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjoy Ghose and Mohd. Farrukh, Advocates. versus FENA PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Harminder Singh and Mr. A.K. Goyal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 29.08.2009 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-IX, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.1128/1998 whereby it was held that the domestic inquiry by the Management was valid and proper and further impugns the award dated 08.09.2009 whereby the petitioner was held not entitled to any relief.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was employed by the respondent company (previously known as M/s. Syndet and Chemical Industries Ltd.) on 16.07.1988 for the post of electrician. The petitioner was drawing wages of Rs.2,553/- (Rupees...
Amit Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 824/2015 AMIT KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Durgadas Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Wiqar Ahmed and Mr. Sunny Pradhan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.84/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Saket, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 22nd May, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Saket Courts Complex, New Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Wiqar Ahmed, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits CRL.M.C. 824/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Cou...
Abhishek Yadav Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : March 02, 2015 W.P.(C) 1853/2015 LALIT KUMAR CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Sunil Dalal Advocate for UOI W.P.(C) 1854/2015 ABHISHEK YADAV Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Sunil Dalal Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The two above captioned writ petitions came up for preliminary hearing on February 27, 2015 and were adjourned for today to enable learned counsel for the respondents to obtain instructions whether any statement of fact pleaded in the writ petition needed a rebuttal, for if no statement of fact made in the writ petition needed a rebuttal, the only question which arose ...
Suraj Bhan Vs. State (Govt of Nct) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 327/2015 & Crl.M.A.1339/2015 SURAJ BHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vikash Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Varun Kumar Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate, for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.929/2012, under Section 135 of The Indian Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 17th July, 2014 (Annexure P-2) issued by respondent No.2-complainant/firstinformant of the FIR in question. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice. Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent CRL.M.C. 327/2015 Page 1 No.2 and submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved between...
H C Asher Vs. Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1507/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.4726/2013 H C ASHER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate versus SAHARA INDIA MUTUAL BENEFIT CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Simranjeet Singh & Mr. Gautam Takiar, Advocates + CRL.M.C. 4597/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.16474/2013 H C ASHER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate versus SAHARA INDIA MUTUAL BENEFIT CO LTD. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Simranjeet Singh & Mr. Gautam Takiar, Advocates % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of criminal complaint No.504/1 and criminal complaint No.497/13, both titled as Sahara India Mutual Benefit Co.Ltd. Vs. M/S Worldlink Finance Ltd. & ors. and under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is sought on merits. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the above captioned Crl.M.C.No.1507/2013 Crl.M.C.No.4597/2013 Page 1 two pe...
Dr. M Haroon Siddiqui Vs. Indian Farmers Fertaliser Cooperative Ltd. a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 6751/2013 SUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER COOPERATIVE LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 824/2014 DR. M HAROON SIDDIQUI ..... Petitioner versus INDIAN FARMERS FERTALISER COOPERATIVE LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Ramesh K. Mishra for Mr Prashant Bhushan in W.P.(C) 6751/2013. Mr Prashant Chandra Sen with Ms Ankita Saikia and Mr Rohit Kumar in W.P.(C) 824/2014 For the Respondent : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rajiv Bansal, and Mr Aman Nandrajog for IFFCO. Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6751/2013. Mr Sanjeev Narula (CGSC) and Mr Ajay Kalra for UOI (R-2 & R-3) in W.P.(C) 824/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petitions impugning a common order dated 05.08.2013 (hereafter impugned order) passed by the Central...
Ved Prakash and Ors. Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 811/2015 VED PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Aditya Kumar Singhal, Advocate versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Humkum Chand Mr. Amit, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl. M.A.No.3068/2015 (u/S5of the Limitation Act, 1963) For reasons stated in the application, delay of 55 days in re-filing the accompanying petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 811/2015 Quashing of FIR No.110/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Mansarovar Park, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 29th May, 2013 (Annexure-B), arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Crl.M.C.No.811/2015 Page 1 Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for...
Avdesh Kumar Dixit and Ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 02, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 799/2015 AVDESH KUMAR DIXIT & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Khemka & Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Bhagat Ram Mr. Ravinder Yadav & Mr. Sridhar Raj, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person + CRL.M.C. 800/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3029/2015 INDUR BABLANI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ravinder Yadav & Mr. Sridhar Raj, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Devender Singh Mr. Amit Khemka & Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person Crl.M.C.No.799/2015 Crl.M.C.No.800/2015 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned first petition quashing of FIR No.239/2013, under Sections 120-B/406/420/46...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »