Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Royston Sequeira and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 876/2015 ROYSTON SEQUEIRA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Dharm Vir Singh Mr. Vivek Jain, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.107/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Crime (Women) Cell, Nanakpura, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 16th July, 2013. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Vivek Jain, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 876/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in q...
Shri Sriram Vs. Smt Bimla Rani and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 104/2014 AND CM No.4222/2014 (Stay) Decided on:4. h March, 2015 % SHRI SRIRAM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.S.Gulati, Advocate. versus SMT BIMLA RANI & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Bhupesh Kumar Varma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. The Petitioner challenges the order dated 30th October, 2013 whereby the eviction petition filed by the Respondent No.1 under Section 14 (1) (a) & (e) read with Section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) was allowed and the Petitioner was directed to vacate the tenanted premises.2. In the eviction petition, the Respondent No.1 stated that the Respondent had purchased the entire suit property bearing No.S-221/132A, Vishnu Garden, S-Block, New Delhi from the Petitioner and thereafter let out one room, kitchen and common WC and bathroom on tenancy at monthly rent of Rs.1,000/- on 2nd September, 2002 to the Petitioner. The Petitioner...
Ashok Vats and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 885/2015 & Crl.M.A.3312/2015 ASHOK VATS & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vishal Vimal and Mr. J.A. Chaudhary, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Ranbir Singh Mr. Satish, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.118/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Najafgarh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 24th October, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Satish, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 885/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that res...
Rohit Chauhan Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 872/2015 & Crl.M.A.3286/2015 ROHIT CHAUHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.B. Rao, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Raj Devi Mr. Neelam Dhaka, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.251/2013, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at police station Begum Pur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 22nd November, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-4). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr.Neelam Dhaka, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 872/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is com...
Dharmendra Kumar and Anr. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 868/2015 & Crl.M.A.3265/52015 DHARMENDRA KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.R. Sharma , Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Shri Ram Mr. Gaurav Kukreja, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.15/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Hari Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 26th May, 2014 arrived at Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-3). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Gaurav Kukreja, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 868/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, pre...
Pardeep and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3388/2013 PARDEEP & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Narender Sharma & Mr. Siddharth Pandit, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Yogesh Kumar Respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In this petition, quashing of FIR No.152/2012, under Sections 3 & 4 of The Delhi Medicare Service Personnel and Medicare Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence And Damage to Property) Act, 2008, registered at police station Mayapuri, Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 23rd April, 2014. Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice of this petition and submits that respondent No.3 is complainant / first-informant of the FIR in question and he is present in the Court and respondent No.2- Dr. Chander Mohan Bhagat...
Sandeep Karkara Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:4. h March, 2014 + CRL.M.C. 5211/2014 SANDEEP KARKARA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Uppal and Mr. T.R. Garg, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: .... Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Deepak Bhardwaj Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (O R A L) % Petitioner is the brother-in-law (Devar) of Respondent No.2, who seeks quashing of FIR No.184/2011, under Sections 406/498-A of IPC registered at Police Station Keshav Puram, Delhi on the basis of Settlement of 17th October, 2013. It is brought to the notice of this Court that this FIR already stands quashed qua the main accused and other family members vide order of 20th January, 2014 in Crl. M.C. No.263/2014. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is CRL.M.C. 5211/2014 Page 1 complainant/first...
Vijay Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 866/2015 VIJAY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.B. Rao, Advocate versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Vijay Pal Mrs. Jaspreet Aulakh and Mr. Chetan Kakkar, Advocates for respondent No.2-BSES RPL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.135/2013, under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Sagarpur, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of No Dues Certificate of 30th January, 2015 (Annexure P-3 ) issued by respondent No.2-complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question. Notice. Ms.Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice. Mrs.Jaspreet Aulakh , Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent CRL.M.C. 866/2015 Page 1 No.2 and submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved betwee...
Praveen Kumar Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3452/2014 PRAVEEN KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dev Raj Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Narendra Singh Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.107/2014, under Sections 457/380 of IPC registered at Police Station Sonia Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 3rd June, 2014 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState appears and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by his counsel as well as by SI Narendra Singh on the basis of identity proof produ...
Nandu Sahani Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :3. d FEBRUARY, 2015 DECIDED ON :4. h MARCH, 2015 + CRL.A. 96/2012 NANDU SAHANI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K. Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Nandu Sahani impugns the legality, correctness and propriety of a judgment dated 26.09.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.49/2010 emanating from FIR No.77/2010 PS Nabi Karim by which he was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 363/354/376 IPC. By a sentence order dated 26.09.2011, he was awarded various prison terms with fine.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as projected in the charge-sheet was that on 06.07.2010, the appellant after kidnapping X (assumed name) aged about 10 years outraged her modesty and sexually assaulted her. On 06.07.2010, Const.Darvesh Singh produced X and the accused Nandu Sahani before...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »