Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Prabhat Malik and Anr. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 05, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5148/2014 & Crl.M.A.17661/2014 PRABHAT MALIK & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Meghna De, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Vijay Singh Mr. Kapil Shukla, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.197/1999, under Sections 406/420/468/471 of IPC registered at police station Civil Lines, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by his counsel as well as by SI Vijay Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits CRL.M.C. ...
Kailash Kaushik Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.152/2013 RAKSHA JINDAL .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Bhuchar, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.159/2013 NIRMAL DEVI .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatin Sehgal and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advocates : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate...
Prem Bahl Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.152/2013 RAKSHA JINDAL .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Bhuchar, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.159/2013 NIRMAL DEVI .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatin Sehgal and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advocates : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate...
Darshan Dayal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.152/2013 RAKSHA JINDAL .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Bhuchar, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.159/2013 NIRMAL DEVI .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatin Sehgal and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advocates : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate...
Savitri Devi and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
$~13, 14, 16 & 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : March 05, 2015 + W.P.(C) 388/2015 OM PRAKASH & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Standing Counsel for UOI W.P.(C) 394/2015 RAJPAL & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Standing Counsel for UOI W.P.(C) 972/2015 DHARAMVIR SINGH & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Shubhra Parashar & Mr.V.P.S.Charak & Mr.Rakesh Mani Tripathi, Advocates W.P.(C) 1717/2015 SAVITRI DEVI & ANR. Represented by: W.P.(C) No.388/2015 & CONN.MATTERS ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate Page 1 of 9 versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJ...
Sahil Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 05, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2000/2014 SAHIL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Dayal, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Puneet Bharti Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.588/2013 under Section 363 of IPC registered at P.S. Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2. Upon notice, Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State, submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question by SI Puneet Bharti on the basis of identity proof furnished by him and that the investigation of this case is complete and the offence made out comes within the ambit of Section 363 of IPC only. CRL.M.C. 2000/2014 Page 1 The status report ...
Inderjeet Singh Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h March, 2015 + Crl.A. 1232/2012 & Crl.M.B.756/2014 INDERJEET SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Kaushal Yadav, Mr.R.K.S.Yadav and Mr.Nandlal Mishra, Advocates versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 01.10.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, South-East, Saket in Sessions Case No.318/2009 arising out of FIR No.266/09 registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar under Section 498A/304B IPC whereby the appellant was convicted for offences punishable under Section 304B as well as 498A IPC and order on sentence dated 08.10.2012 vide which he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for offence under Section 304B IPC and 3 years Rigorous Imprisonment and a fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under Section 498A IPC in...
Gianwati Taxak Vs. The University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.8136/2014 and C.M. No.3944/2015 5th March, 2015 % GIANWATI TAXAK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil Mathews with Ms.Reeja Varghese, Advocates. versus THE UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.J.S.Rupal, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Rajinder Dhawan and Mr.B.S.Rana, Advocates for R- 2 to 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, an employee of the respondent no.2/Sri Aurobindo College (Evening) impugns the departmental proceedings commenced against her in terms of the charge-sheet dated 02.9.2014. The petitioner prays for quashing of the departmental proceedings. The petitioner also prays for quashing of her suspension in terms of the order of the respondent no.2/College dated 02.4.2014.2. So far as the challenge to suspension is concerned, as per the existing writ ...
Tara Chand Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:5. h March, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. No.2674/2014 & Crl. M. (Bail) No.11174/2014 TARA CHAND Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankit Khurana, Ms.Karishma & Mr.Alam, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. for the complainant. + BAIL APPLN. No.2680/2014 & Crl. M. (Bail) No.11176/2014 ANUJ KUMAR JAIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankit Khurana, Ms.Karishma & Mr.Alam, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. for the complainant. + BAIL APPLN. No.38/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.250/2015 RAMESH KR. CHOUHAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sudhir Naagar, Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Saroja & Ms.Alka, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. for the complainant. + BAIL APPLN. No.119/2015 &...
Champatlal Jain Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:5. h March, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. No.2674/2014 & Crl. M. (Bail) No.11174/2014 TARA CHAND Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankit Khurana, Ms.Karishma & Mr.Alam, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. for the complainant. + BAIL APPLN. No.2680/2014 & Crl. M. (Bail) No.11176/2014 ANUJ KUMAR JAIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Ankit Khurana, Ms.Karishma & Mr.Alam, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. for the complainant. + BAIL APPLN. No.38/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.250/2015 RAMESH KR. CHOUHAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sudhir Naagar, Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Saroja & Ms.Alka, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.Anurag Jain, Adv. for the complainant. + BAIL APPLN. No.119/2015 &...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »