Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pushpa Singh Vs. Director of Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.7218/2013 9th March, 2015 PUSHPA SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.M.Tripathi, Advocate. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Nikhita Khetrapal, Advocate for R- 1 & 2. Mr.Mukesh Kher, Advocate for R- 3 & 4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner who is an employee of the UPRAS Vidyalaya/respondent nos. 3 & 4, seeks the reliefs of regularization of the services of the petitioner as T.G.T (Mathematics) and according consequential benefits. The reliefs as stated hereinabove claimed by the petitioner are in sum and substance the reliefs claimed in the writ petition though by language reliefs have been worded separately in view of the order passed by the Directorate of Education dated 24.9.2013.2. By the judgment in the case of Army Public School ...
the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Global Steel Holdings ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 337/2014 with EA Nos. 697-98 of 2014 and 199-200 of 2015 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr. D. Roy Choudhuri, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.K. Anand, Mr. Madhu Sudan Bhayana, Mr. R.N. Yadav, Ms. Payal Juneja and Mr. Chetan Anand, Advocates. versus GLOBAL STEEL HOLDINGS LIMITED & ORS ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajneesh Chopra, Mr. Gautam Mirza, Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Gaurav Mahajan and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates for JD-1 & 2. Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rajneesh Chopra, Mr. Gautam Mirza, Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Gaurav Mahajan and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates for JD-3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0903.2015 Introduction 1. On 30th August 2014 State Trading Corporation of India Limited (STC), the Decree Holder (DH), filed the present execution petition for execution of the Settlement Agreement (SA) dated 15th November 201...
Om Saran Gupta Vs. Nishi Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
I-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 09, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 897/2015 & Crl. M.A.Nos.3380-81/2015 OM SARAN GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajeev Chetri, Mr. Rajesh Chetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates versus NISHI GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of criminal complaint No.8583/1/2014, titled as Nishi Gupta Vs. Om Saran Gupta, under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and the summoning order of 1st October, 2014 is sought on merits in this petition. At the hearing, it was disclosed by learned counsel for petitioner that Notice under Section 251 of Cr.P.C. has not yet been framed and the next date before trial court is 23rd march, 2015. At the outset, it is made clear that learned counsel for petitioner has not been heard on merits. Since petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy available to him to urge the pleas taken herein before trial court at Crl.M.C.N...
Dharam Pal Dabas Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation (Ndmc) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1559/2015 & CM APPL. Nos. 2770 & 2771/2015 DHARAM PAL DABAS Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Agarwal & Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) AND ANR. ... Respondents Through Mr. Parvinder Chauhan & Mr. Nishant Prateek, Advocates for R1/ NDMC Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Advocate for R2/ SDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 09.03.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.2770/2015 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1559/2015 & CM APPL. No.2771/2015 (Direction) 1. By this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 26.11.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the CAT) in Original Application (in short OA) No.466/2012 prefe...
Saj Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Virender Dagar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:09. 03.2015 CRL.L.P. 382/2014 SAJ PROPERTIES PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Advocate versus VIRENDER DAGAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. This petition has been preferred to seek leave to appeal under Section 378 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr PC) against the judgment dated 04.07.2013 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, Delhi in CC No.3365/2012 by the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (the Act) titled Saj Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Virender Dagar. By the impugned judgment, the learned MM has acquitted the respondent/accused of the alleged offence.2. The case of the petitioner/complainant was that the respondent/accused had issued the cheque dated 30.10.2009 for a sum of Rs.12 lacs drawn on Bank of Baroda, Smalka Branch, Delhi in favour of the...
Prem Kumar Gupta Vs. Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: March 09,2015 W.P.(C) 2630/2014 & C.M.No.5465/2014 (Stay) PREM KUMAR GUPTA Through: versus BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Vineet Sinha and Mr.Rahul Malhotra, Advs. ..... Respondents Mrs.Manjula Gandhi, Ms.Aayushi Gupta and Mr.Aditya Kapoor, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. The writ petition at hand brings a challenge to the validity of the order dated 18.02.2014 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dismissing inter alia Appeal No.426/2013 which had been instituted by the petitioner to assail the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in Original Application (OA) No.34/2007. He has to consequently deposit 25% of the amount claimed by the first respondent bank in the OA.2. When the matter was taken up for final hearing, it was submitted by the counsel on both sides that the proceedings on the OA are now at final sta...
Jamati Devi and Ors. Vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 465/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. versus JAMATI DEVI & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Sonam Anand, Adv. with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Adv. MAC.APP. 877/2013 JAMATI DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Ms. Sonam Anand, Adv. with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Adv. versus SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.15281/2013 (delay) in MAC APP.877/2013 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 438 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 465/2013 MAC.APP. 877/2013 1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment dated 17.07.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `11,06,775/- was a...
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Jamati Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 465/2013 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. versus JAMATI DEVI & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Sonam Anand, Adv. with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Adv. MAC.APP. 877/2013 JAMATI DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Ms. Sonam Anand, Adv. with Mr. Nimit Mathur, Adv. versus SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manish Kaushik, Adv. for Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.15281/2013 (delay) in MAC APP.877/2013 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 438 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 465/2013 MAC.APP. 877/2013 1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment dated 17.07.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `11,06,775/- was a...
Pushkar Mal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Chaudhary, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.152/2013 RAKSHA JINDAL .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Bhuchar, Advocate : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocates CRL.A.159/2013 NIRMAL DEVI .. Appellant .. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatin Sehgal and Ms. Naina Dubey, Advocates : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP with Ms. Monica Gupta and Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Advocate...
Geeta Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-05-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:5. h March, 2015 % + BAIL APPLN. 2726/2014 GEETA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. Mr.S.P.Kaushal, Mr.P.S.Bindra, Mr.Amit Anand & Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advs. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with SI Ram Bhool Singh, PS Fatehpur Beri, in person. Mr.D.S. Tomar, Adv. with Mr.Manish Kumar & Mr.Vivek Kumar, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present application has been filed by the mother-in-law of the deceased under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.115/2013 under Sections 498A/304-B/34 IPC, Police Station Fatehpur Beri.2. The petitioner is a woman. She is in custody since 24th May, 2013. Her case is that she has been falsely implicated in the above said FIR. She submits that she is a law abiding citizen and permanent resident of Delhi and has absolutely clean antecedents. She belongs to a good fa...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »