Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Solvent and Chemical Corporation Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 401/2015 Judgment reserved on:05. 03.2015 % Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2015 BHARAT SOLVENT & CHEMICAL CORPORATION Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioner : Mr Balbir Singh with Mr Mahesh B. Chhibber and Mr Angad Sandhu For the Respondents : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr Advocate with Mr Neeraj Jain and Mr Sarafraz Ahmad CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks, inter alia, quashing of the Final Findings of the Designated Authority notified through the Notification dated 11.12.2014 issued under F.No.14/26/2012-DGAD by the Directorate General of Anti Dumping & Allied Duties, Department of Commerce, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India. The investigation was conducted under the provisions of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 in respect of the alleged ...
Bundu Vs. Shah Alam and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1167/2009 Reserved on:25. h February, 2015 Decided on:9. h March, 2015 % BUNDU Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate. versus SHAH ALAM & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. M.U. Khan, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The Petitioner/Plaintiff had filed a suit before the learned Trial Court seeking specific performance of an Agreement to Sell of immovable property executed by Respondent/Defendant No.1 in favour of the Petitioner.2. It was the case of the Petitioner in the plaint that the Respondent No.1 had, in pursuance to the Agreement to Sell, put the Petitioner into possession of the property. Along with the suit, an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC was filed wherein the learned Trial Court passed an order dated 31st March, 1989 directing the parties to maintain status-quo in respect of property bearing Stall No.5, situated at Bengali Market, New Seema Puri, Shahdara, Delhi....
University of Delhi Vs. Sh. Tahel Ram Bellani and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2282/2015 % Judgement pronounced on:09. 03.2015 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ... Petitioner Through: Mr Girindra Kumar Pathak, Adv. Versus SH. TAHEL RAM BELLANI AND ORS. .......Respondents Through: Ms.Amrita Prakash, Advocate for R3&4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No.4088/2015 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2282/2015 and CM No.4087/2015 (stay) 1. Heard.2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order of the Controlling Authority dated 18.03.2014 under The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the PG Act), whereby the petitioner was directed to pay the remaining gratuity along with simple interest at the rate of 10% from the date it became payable till the date of payment to the respondent and also against the order of the Appellate Authority dated 03.09.2014, whereby the appeal filed by the petition...
Abdul Alim Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h FEBRUARY, 2015 DECIDED ON :9. h MARCH, 2015 + CRL.A. 636/2012 ABDUL ALIM ..... Appellant Through : Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 20.12.2011 in Sessions Case No.254/2010 emanating from FIR No.203/2010 PS New Usmanpur by which the appellant Abdul Alim was held guilty for committing offence under Sections 354/377 IPC, the instant appeal has been preferred by him By an order dated 21.12.2011, the appellant was awarded RI for two years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 354 IPC and RI for ten years with fine `10,000/- under Section 377 IPC.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 23.06.2010 at about 10.30 A.M. at House No.G-57, Gali No.3, Shastri Park, the appellant sexually assaulted X (assumed name) aged four years and also commit...
Chandrika Prasad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY10 2015 DECIDED ON : MARCH09 2015 + CRL.A.543/2014 CHANDRIKA PRASAD ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Arundhati Katju with Mr.Akshay Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Chandrika Prasad is aggrieved by a judgment dated 23.01.2014 of learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Central/THC, Delhi in Sessions Case No.67/2013 arising out of FIR No.30/13 registered at Police Station Prasad Nagar by which he was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 354 IPC and Section 10 of POCSO Act. By an order dated 27.01.2014, he was awarded RI for five years with fine `2,000/- under Section 10 of POCSO Act.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 09.02.2013 and before that, in premises No.16/1069 E Block, Khalsa Nagar, Tank Road, Karol Bagh, Delhi, X (assumed name), aged 10 years, was sexu...
Bijender Singh Vs. Haryana Roadways
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6th February, 2015 Date of Decision:09. h March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 1120/2012 BIJENDER SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate. versus HARYANA ROADWAYS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition the petitioner assails the order dated 22.12.2011 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.124/2005 whereby both the issues framed before the learned trial court were decided against the workmen/petitioner and he was held not entitled to any relief.2. In a nutshell the facts of the present case are that the petitioner was appointed to the post of driver w.e.f. 06.07.1999 with the respondent authority on the basis of driving license bearing number 14692/LA/UNA/HP issued by R.T.A., Una, Himachal Pradesh and the said driving license was rene...
Jyoti Sateeja Vs. International Committee of the Red Cross and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2824/2012 Decided on:09. 03.2015 IN THE MATTER OF : JYOTI SATEEJA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajesh R. Dubey, Advocate with Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocates versus INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Trideep Pais, Advocate with Mr. Radhika Kolluru, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) I.A. 20450/2014 (by the defendant No.1 under Order I Rule 10(2) read with Section 151 CPC) 1. This application has been filed by the defendant No.1 praying inter alia that the names of defendants No.2 and 3 be dropped from the array of parties.2. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit against the defendants praying inter alia for a decree of declaration to the effect that the service regulations of the defendant No.1 governing her service are inapplicable to her since she has not signed the same. She further prays for a decree of declaration that her service ...
Hardeep Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h March, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4415/2014 HARDEEP SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Jagier Singh, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Chander Bhan Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER ( O R A L) Quashing of FIR No.210/1997, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement recorded in the order of 12th May, 2007 passed by Additional District & Judge, Delhi (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. M.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Chander Bhan on the basis of ident...
Kamal Narayan Kaul Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 8103/2014 & CM189042014 KAMAL NARAYAN KAUL ... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Vishal Maan : Mr Siddharth Panda : Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the201. Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the189. Act) and in respect of which Award No.14/1987-88 of 1987 was made, ...
Sahab Singh and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 09, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 894/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3377/2015 SAHAB SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Niraj Chaudhary & Mr. A.S.Sharma, Advocates versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Ombir Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.89/2010, under Sections 498-A/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Welcome Colony, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 17th January, 2013 (Annexure-B), arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Ombir Singh on the basis of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »