Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Singh Setia Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.2191/2014 10th March, 2015 RAM SINGH SETIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S.Ray, Ms. Rakhi Ray, Mr. Vaibhav Gulia and Ms. Rupali Lal Mathur, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who was an aspirant to the post of Executive Director of a Nationalized Bank, impugns the actions of the respondents in denying him the post of the Executive Director for the relevant year of consideration being 2012-2013.2. It is not disputed that the applicable guidelines by which appointments are made by the respondents to the post of Executive Directors of different banks are contained in the Guidelines dated 13.4.2011, and these guidelines have also been filed by the respondents themse...
M/S Kirit Films Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. M/S Eagle Theaters and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:10. h March, 2015 % + I.A. No.9964/2014 in CS(OS) 351/2009 M/S KIRIT FILMS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Deepak R. Dahiya, Adv. versus M/S EAGLE THEATERS AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr.Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. & Mr.Pradeep Diwan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anupam Dhingra, Mr.Abhimanyu, Ms.Harleen Kaur & Mr.Tejas Parashar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the pending application bearing I.A. No.9964/2014 under Order VI Rule 17 CPC filed by the plaintiffs.2. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit for declaration and injunction against the defendants in respect of premises consisting of Flat No.10, 2nd Floor, Plaza Cinema Building, Connaught Place, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the suit premises). Plaintiff No.1 is a body corporate of which plaintiff No.2 is the Managing Director. Defendant No....
Gaurav Malhotra Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 10, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 945/2015 GAURAV MALHOTRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajinder Pal Singh, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with ASI Balraj Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.121/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Nanak Pura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement-Deed of 10th May, 2014 (Annexure-B). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by ASI Balraj on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits on Cr...
Bikram Singh Negi and Anr. Vs. State of Delhi (Nct) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 10, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 940/2015 BIKRAM SINGH NEGI & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Divya Malhotra, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE OF DELHI ( NCT) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Mohd. Raza Mr. Hemant Mehta, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.153/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Crime Against Women Cell, Nanakpura, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding (Annexure-P-2). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State accepts notice and Mr. Hemant Mehta , Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first- Crl.M.C.No....
Jagatvir Singh Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 10, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 995/2014 JAGATVIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rishabh Raj Jain, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Rajpal Mr. Harshbir Singh Kohli, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.41/2009, under Sections 285/337 of the IPC, registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 4th September, 2013 (Annexure-P-2) and respondent No.2s affidavit of 21st February, 2014. Notice. Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Harshbir Singh Kohli, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Crl.M.C.No.995/2014 Page 1 submits that respondent No.2, present in the Co...
Sunil Gupta Vs. Nargis Khanna
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on :10. h March, 2015 % + I.A. Nos.12251/2014 and I.A. No.21133/2014 in CS(OS) No.149/2011 SUNIL GUPTA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.R. Agarwal & Mrs. Anju Bhushan, Advs. versus NARGIS KHANNA Through ..... Defendant Mr. Harkirat Sawhney, Adv. with Mr. Bakhshi Bikram Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for partition filed by the plaintiff against the defendant in respect of the property bearing No.N-47, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi- 110017 (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property"). By this order, I propose to decide the pending applications, i.e.:- 2. (i) I.A. No.12251/2014 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC, filed by the plaintiff) (ii) I.A. No.21133/2014 (under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC, filed by the plaintiff) Brief facts for the purpose of adjudication of these applications are that the suit property ...
Solitaire Ventures Pte Ltd and Others Vs. Vipul Sez Developers Pvt Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: March 10, 2015 O.M.P. 1123/2012 SOLITAIRE VENTURES PVT LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Mr.C.S.Chauhan, Ms.Shivi Agarwal, Ms.Henna George and Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv. versus VIPUL SEZ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Virmani & Ms.Mukta Dutta, Advs. for R-2 & 5 to 7. Mr.Amit Singh Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Sharma & Mr.Aakash Bajaj, Advs. for R-3. Mr.H.S.Chandhoke, Adv. with Ms.Charu Rawat, Advs. for R-4. + O.M.P. 551/2014 & I.A. No.15117/2014 M/S SILVERSTONE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amit Singh Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Akash Bajaj & Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Advs. versus M/S VIPUL SEZ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through + Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Virmani & Ms.Mukta Dutta, Advs. for R-2 & 6 to 8. Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv.for R-3 & R-4. Mr.H...
Solitaire Ventures Pvt Ltd and Ors Vs. Vipul Sez Developers Pvt Ltd an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: March 10, 2015 O.M.P. 1123/2012 SOLITAIRE VENTURES PVT LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Mr.C.S.Chauhan, Ms.Shivi Agarwal, Ms.Henna George and Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv. versus VIPUL SEZ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Virmani & Ms.Mukta Dutta, Advs. for R-2 & 5 to 7. Mr.Amit Singh Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Sharma & Mr.Aakash Bajaj, Advs. for R-3. Mr.H.S.Chandhoke, Adv. with Ms.Charu Rawat, Advs. for R-4. + O.M.P. 551/2014 & I.A. No.15117/2014 M/S SILVERSTONE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amit Singh Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Akash Bajaj & Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Advs. versus M/S VIPUL SEZ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through + Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Virmani & Ms.Mukta Dutta, Advs. for R-2 & 6 to 8. Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv.for R-3 & R-4. Mr.H...
M/S Silverstone Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Vipul Sez Developers Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: March 10, 2015 O.M.P. 1123/2012 SOLITAIRE VENTURES PVT LTD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. along with Mr.Arvind Kumar, Mr.C.S.Chauhan, Ms.Shivi Agarwal, Ms.Henna George and Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv. versus VIPUL SEZ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Virmani & Ms.Mukta Dutta, Advs. for R-2 & 5 to 7. Mr.Amit Singh Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Sharma & Mr.Aakash Bajaj, Advs. for R-3. Mr.H.S.Chandhoke, Adv. with Ms.Charu Rawat, Advs. for R-4. + O.M.P. 551/2014 & I.A. No.15117/2014 M/S SILVERSTONE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Amit Singh Chadha, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Akash Bajaj & Mr.Abhishek Sharma, Advs. versus M/S VIPUL SEZ DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through + Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Rashmi Virmani & Ms.Mukta Dutta, Advs. for R-2 & 6 to 8. Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv.for R-3 & R-4. Mr.H...
Harpreet Singh Kler Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-10-2015
$~17 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:10. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 7817/2014 and CM No.18357/2014 HARPREET SINGH KLER ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondent No.1 : Mr Dev P. Bhardwaj For the Respondent Nos.2&3 : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi For the Respondent No.4 : Mr M.K. Singh CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. Mr Yeeshu Jain, the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the Land Acquisition Collector and Mr M.K. Singh, the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the DDA have handed over the counter affidavits. The same are taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder/affidavit inasmuch as all the necessary averments are contained in the writ petition.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit ...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »