Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jasmeet Chadha and Ors. Vs. Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
I-26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 972/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3629/2015 JASMEET CHADHA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. A.P. Guliani, Advocate versus NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Satish Bhati Mr. Vikramaditya Bhaskar, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.49/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Kalkajee, New Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 21st May, 2014 (Annexure-P-31), arrived at Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Vikramaditya Bhaskar, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits Crl.M.C.No.972/2015 Page 1 tha...
Siddharth Girdhar and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 956/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3589/2015 SIDDHARTH GIRDHAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with WASI Sunita Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.481/2003, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 30th July, 2014 (Annexure-P-2), arrived at Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by WASI Sunita on the basis of identity...
M K Jaswani and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 712/2012 & Crl.M.A.2528/2012 M K JASWANI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. J.R. Chopra, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Sanjay Kumar Mr. V.K. Gupta, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.29/2010, under Sections 427/448/453/511/34 of IPC registered at police station Amar Colony, New Delhi is sought on merits. During the pendency of this petition, the parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre where they have amicably settled their disputes vide Settlement Agreement of 16 th January, 2015, which is on record. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, has been identified to be CRL.M.C. 712/2012 Page 1 complain...
Nasir Ali and Anr. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 976/2015 & Crl.M.A.3632/2015 NASIR ALI & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rohil Kaliyar, Mr. Siddharth Sunewal and Ms. Ananya Roy, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Vishvendra Mr. S.M. Dixit, Advocate with respondents No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.95/2007, under Sections 323/308/341/452/34 of IPC registered at police station Seemapuri, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavits of respondents No.2 & 3. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. S.M. Dixit, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, are identified to be the CRL.M.C. 97...
Sandeep Saigal and Ors. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 693/2015 SANDEEP SAIGAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Poonam Mendiratta and Mr. Sigharth Basu, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Rajneesh Mr. Avnish Gupta, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Crl.M.A.3654/2015 (early hearing) For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the hearing in the main petition is preponed for today and next date of hearing on 22nd July, 2015 is cancelled. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 693/2015 Quashing of FIR No.225/2012, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at police station Keshav Puram, Delhi is sought on the basis of CRL.M.C. 693/2015 Page 1 Settlement Agreement of 25th November, 2013 (Annexure P-2). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional ...
M.S Adil Vs. Syndicate Banks and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:26. 02.2015 Judgment Pronounced on:11. 03.2015 + CS(OS) 2182/2013 M.S ADIL Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Asutosh Lohia, Mr.Satish Kumar and Ms.Soumya Kumar, Advocates Versus SYNDICATE BANKS & ORS ..... Defendants Through Ms.Reena Jain Malhotra and Mr.S.V.Tyagi, Advocate for D1/Bank CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.17981/2013 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) and 17982/2013 (u/S5of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 5566 days in filing the suit) 1. IA No.17981/2013 is an application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC. On 11.12.2013 this court had restrained defendant No.1-Bank from recovering any sum from the plaintiff in terms of the sanction letter dated 09.12.1993.2. The accompanying suit is filed for declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction by the plaintiff. The plaint states that defendant No.2 entered into a Bank Guarantee Limit Agreement with defendant No.1 on 09.12.1993. It is urged that ...
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd Vs. Sandeep Kumar and Anot ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: February 11 , 2015 Date of Decision: March 11, 2015 + CS(OS)2502/2012 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Ajay Saroya and Ms.Nisha Mohandas, Advs. versus SANDEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER ..... Defendant Through Mr.Dhruv Kumra, Adv. for D-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.20485/2013 (leave to defend) 1. This is an application on behalf of defendant No.1 under Order 37 Rule 3 (5) CPC seeking unconditional leave to defend. The plaintiff has filed the accompanying suit.2. The present case is a typical example of how unscrupulous builders are cheating and duping innocent small time investors in the hope of purchasing a small residential unit. These investors are being deceived by unregulated real estate market. This is also a glaring example of how statutory/government authorities like Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority are in deep slumber and are permitting unsc...
Mmtc Limited Vs. Transammonia Ag. Zurich (Switzerland)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 212/2015 MMTC LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj K. Kaul, ASG with Mr. Ruchin Midha, Mr. Rohit Puri and Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Advocates. versus TRANSAMMONIA AG. ZURICH (SWITZERLAND) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ciccu Mukhopadhaya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Omar Ahmad, Mr. Manu Krishnan and Ms. Rashmi Gagoi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1103.2015 I.A. 5084 of 2015 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. OMP No.212 of 2015 1. Challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) by MMTC is to the Arbitral Award dated 27th November 2014 passed by the three member Arbitral Tribunal (AT) adjudicating the disputes between MMTC and the Respondent, Transammonia AG. Zurich (TAG) arising out a contract dated 7th October 2011.2. In terms of this contract, TAG agreed to supply and sell to MMTC, a net quantity of 2,00,000 metric to...
Pradeep Kaur Vs. H.S.Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M. (M) No.1530/2007 Decided on :11. h March, 2015 PRADEEP KAUR Through: Petitioner Mr. Tarun Kr. Bedi, Advocate. Versus H.S.KHURANA Through: Respondent Mr. Akshay Gaur, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 15.9.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge granting maintenance of Rs.6,000/- per month to the petitioner and her the then two minor children.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has been heard, who has contended that the order of maintenance of Rs.6,000/- per month is grossly inadequate on account of the expenses which the petitioner is incurring the expenses of the studies of the children in a public school. It has also been stated that the petitioner is not carrying on any activity which would have earned her some income while as it has been established on record that the respondent had inte...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Tilak Raj Nayyar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
$-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 923/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.A.K. Soni, Advocate versus TILAK RAJ NAYYAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate for Respondents no.1 & 2. Ms. Meena Kohli, Advocate for Respondents no.3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 07.07.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.15,03,399/- was awarded for the death of Sunil Nayyar, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 12.07.2008.2. On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of Maruti Car bearing no.DL-4CF-1641. The Claims Tribunal accepted the income of the deceased as Rs.1,10,700/- per annum. Considering four dependants i.e. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »