Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 12 2015

Indrajit Ghosh Vs. The Registrar, Jawaharlal Nehru University and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 881/2015 & CM15381539/2015, 4342/2015 INDRAJIT GHOSH ..... Petitioner versus THE REGISTRAR, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Chetna Gera. For the Respondents : Mr Mohinder Jit Singh Rupal for JNU/R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:i) Respondent no.1 and 2 to get the answer sheet of the M.A. (Philosophy) Entrance Exam of the Petitioner reevaluated by an independent and neutral person outside the influence of Respondent no.1, 2 & 3 and place the Petitioner at appropriate position in the merit list of the entrance examination of the M.A. (Philosophy). 2. The petitioner appeared for the entrance examination for seeking admission to Jawaharlal Nehru University (hereafter JNU) for the postgraduate degree ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Prof. P. Pradha Saradhi Vs. University of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1331/2014 and C.M. Nos.112/2015 & 4318/2015 12th March, 2015 % PROF. P. PRADHA SARADHI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Neela Gokhale, Advocate. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Beenashaw N. Soni, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns the penalty imposed upon the petitioner by the Disciplinary Authority/Executive Council of the respondent/University, vide order dated 3.11.2012, by which petitioner was issued warning to desist from the behaviour as stated in the charge-sheet and that the petitioner was not to be assigned any administrative responsibility for a period of five years.2. In the writ petition, petitioner has raised the following ground (G) in her writ petition:- (G) BECAUSE the petitioners request to be defended by an adv...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Reliance Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt Sunita and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-2015

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h March, 2015 % + MAC.APP. No.296/2014 RELIANCE GEN. INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Proxy counsel for Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv. Versus SMT SUNITA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. for R-1 to 4. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment on the ground of illness of Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, arguing counsel for the appellant. The counsel for the respondents no.1 to 4 who were the claimants before the Tribunal (respondents no.5 & 6 being the driver and owner respectively of the vehicle which had caused the accident) states that the respondents no.1 to 4 have received the amount awarded under the impugned award / judgment from the appellant even prior to the filing of this appeal by the appellant. He states that this appeal is thus not maintainable.2. A perusal of the order sheet in the appeal shows that this Court, while issuing notice of this a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Lakhwinder Singh Vs. The Food Corporation of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1628/2005 12th March, 2015 % LAKHWINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Mansi Ajmani, Advocate. versus THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Karunesh Tondon, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, an employee of the respondent no.1/Food Corporation of India, impugns the orders passed against him by the departmental authorities, the Disciplinary Authority dated 22.12.2001; Appellate Authority dated 3/5.12.2002 and the Reviewing Authority dated 12.7.2004, whereby penalty has been imposed upon the petitioner of reduction to the lower time scale of pay i.e from the post of AG-II(D) to AGIII (D) for a period of two years with a further direction that his pay will be fixed at the stage of AG-III(D) as if he would not have been promot...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2015

Akash Dhama Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1576/2015 AKASH DHAMA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amitabh Marwah , Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 12.03.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By the instant Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner questions the tenability of the impugned order dated 07.11.14 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal dismissed the Original Application preferred by the petitioner.2. We would now turn to the facts of the case for better comprehension:The petitioner was selected as Constable (Executive) Male in Delhi Police. He was called for Medical Test and Police Verification on the basis of the Written Test. The Petitioner was asked to wait for the appointment order and in the meanwhile the Resp...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2015

Sunita Devi Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2015

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : March 02, 2015 Judgment Delivered On : March 11, 2015 W.P.(C) 2254/2014 SUNITA DEVI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.N.L.Bareja, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms.Silky Luthra, Advocate for R-2 & R-3 W.P.(C) 2258/2014 YOGENDRA SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: GP Capt.Karan Singh Bhati, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Ms.Silky Luthra, Advocate for R-2 & R-3 W.P.(C) 3070/2014 SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: GP Capt.Karan Singh Bhati, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Manish Mohan, CGSC with Mr.Ikrant Sharma, Ms.Manisha Rana Singh and Ms.Hina Shaheen, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2015

Yogendra Singh and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2015

Sanjay Kumar and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2015

Shri. Brij Kishore Gupta Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.1090/2001 11th March, 2015 SHRI. BRIJ KISHORE GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.R.Faridi and Mr. J.K.Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.K.Taneja, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv. for R-2 to R-6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner who is an employee of the respondent no.2/employer/National Thermal Power Corporation Limited (NTPC Ltd.), seeks the relief of being granted various promotions and these reliefs are as per prayers (a) and (b) of the writ petition and which prayers read as under:PRAYER It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to pass or issue:- (a) a writ, order or directions in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents hereto to immediately promote the Petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 2015

Cit Vs. Tilak Raj Anand

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-11-2015

$~22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 11.03.2015 + ITA9802011 ITA9942011 CIT ..Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus TILAK RAJ ANAND ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In these appeals, the Revenue is aggrieved by a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 03.12.2010 in IT (SS) A No.48/Del/2006 and IT (SS) A. NO./85/Del/2006. The ITAT had affirmed the findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereafter referred to as CIT(A)]. in regard to certain amounts originally added in the course of block assessment proceedings by the Assessing Officer (AO).2. The brief facts are that the assessees premises were searched pursuant to which notice under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as the Act) was iss...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.