Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 13 2015

Om Raj and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

$~18 to 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : March 13, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2408/2015 OM RAJ AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Ankur Chhibber & Mr.Prashant Sivarajan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Kamal Kant Jha, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Sejwal, Law Officer W.P.(C) 2413/2015 VIJAY KUMAR PARASAD AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber & Mr.Prashant Sivarajan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Kamal Kant Jha, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Sejwal, Law Officer W.P.(C) 2415/2015 SHISH RAM Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber & Mr.Prashant Sivarajan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos.2408/2015, 2413/2015, 2415/2015 & 2430/2015 ..... Respondents Mr.Kamal Kant Jha, Advocate with Mr.S.S.Sejwal, Law Officer Page 1 of 9 W.P.(C) 2430/2015 SRIKRISHAN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber & Mr.Prashant Sivarajan, Advs...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Cit Vs. Kei Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 02.2015 Pronounced on:13. 03.2015 + ITA3862013 CIT .Appellant Through: Sh. Balbir Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel and Sh. Abhishek Singh Baghel, Advocate. Versus KEI INDUSTRIES LTD. ..Respondent Through: Sh. Satyen Sethi and Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The question of law framed in this case is as follows: Whether the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the loss suffered by the Assessee in a unit entitled for exemption under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be set off against income from any other unit not eligible for such exemption?. 2. The brief facts of this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) are as follows. M/s. Kei Industries Ltd., (hereinafter the Assessee) is a Public Limited company, engaged in the business of manufacturing c...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Dingal Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

$~3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1626/2014 Date of decision:13. h March, 2015 DINGAL ..... Appellant Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent ThroughMs. Aashaa Tiwari, APP along with SI Pushpendra, P.S. Kashmere Gate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): With the consent of the counsel, instead of taking up the bail application for consideration, we have taken up the appeal for hearing and disposal.2. Dingal impugns and challenges his conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for having committed murder of Noor Mohammad @ Kalia on the intervening night between 31st December, 2011 and 1st January, 2012.3. The impugned judgment dated 17th October, 2014 arises out of FIR No.1/2012, Police Station Kashmere Gate. The impugned judgment acquitted the other two co- accused, namely, Farid @ Mota and Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Dass. State has ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Shish Ram Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Vijay Kumar Parasad and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

M/S. Dcm Shriram Consolidated Ltd. Vs. The Employees Provident Funds A ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d February, 2015 Date of Decision:13. h March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 3743/2011 M/s. DCM SHRIRAM CONSOLIDATED LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar with Ms. Rashmi, Advocates. versus THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUNDS APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Balraj Diwan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition the petitioner impugns the order dated 28.03.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal (respondent No.1 herein) wherein the statutory appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 7-I of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as EPF Act) was dismissed and also impugns the order dated 03.02.2006 wherein the Assistant Provident Funds Commissioner (respondent No.3 herein) imposed damages to the tune of Rs.19,69,566/- (Rupees Nineteen lakh sixty nine thousand fi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Gulshan Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State of Delhi and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 13, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1021/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3806/2015 GULSHAN KUMAR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Joginder Kumar & Mr. Sehrawat, Advocates versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Prabhu Dyal Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate with respondent No.2-complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.38/2013, under Sections 323/325/241/ 147/149 of the IPC, registered at police station Jaffarpur Kalan, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 1st October, 2014 reached through Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi. Notice. Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant and injured of the FIR in question and he has been identified...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Satyam Kaushik Vs. State and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 13, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2159/2014 & Crl.M.A.7240/2014 SATYAM KAUSHIK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ajay Burman, Mr. Dhurav Mohan, Mr. Karan Burman, Mr. Karan Sidhu and Mr. Harshit Khurana, Advocates versus STATE & ORS Through: .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Ved Prakash Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.265/2013, under Sections 279/304A of IPC registered at police station Vasant Kunj, Delhi is sought on the ground that no culpable negligence can be attributed to petitioner and that the legal heirs of the deceased have been adequately compensated. Learned counsel for petitioner relies upon the decisions in Puttaswamy v. State of Karnataka & Ors. J.T. 2008 (12) S.C. 561, CRL.M.C. 2159/2014 Page 1 Narender Singh and Others v. State of Punjab & Ano...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Ashim Dewan Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 13, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 992/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.3968/2015 ASHIM DEWAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gaurav Kajla, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with ASI Rajgopalan Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.101/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC, registered at police station K.N. Katju Marg, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 8th October, 2013 (Annexure-B). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by ASI Rajgopalan on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Learned Additional Public Prose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2015

Rakesh Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on March 13 , 2015 + Review Pet.No.579/2014 in W.P (C) No.8815/2014 RAKESH TIWARI Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Jyoti Singh Senior Advocate with Ms. Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Sameer Sharma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for Union of India CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this application filed under Section 114 of the CPC, the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 12.12.2014 passed by this Court, whereby the Writ Petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant application is that when the Writ Petition was listed on 12.12.2014, gross misrepresentation was made by the respondents by stating that the petitioner stood relieved on 8.12.2014 and also that a reliever had already joined in his place at Base Hospital, ITBP on 11.12.2014. It is ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.