Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun a and Ors. Vs. National Board of Examination
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 1547/2015 & CM No.2749/2015 ARUN A AND ORS. ..... Petitioners versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Puneet Yadav. For the Respondents : Dr Rakesh Gosain. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:a) issue an appropriate Writ/Order or Direction in the nature of a Writ of mandamus to the Respondents to ensure that all the seats notified in July, 2014 session of Diplomat of National Board examination are allotted to the candidates/students who have secured ranks and are not carried forward to the January, 2015 session of the Diplomat of National Board examination; b) issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction in the nature of a Writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to report the vacant seats left out after conducting 2nd round...
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No.16/2014 Reserved on:5. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h March, 2015 % Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. (Now known as Sony India Limited) ...Appellant Through Mr. N. Venkataraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Chopra and Mr. Harpreet Singh Ajmani, Advocates. Versus Commissioner of Income Tax III Through Respondent Mr. G.C. Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roychaudhri, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocates ITA No.70/2014 Discovery Communications India Through ..Appellant Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Taran Deep Singh, Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun Singh, Ms. Husnal Syali & Mr. Harkunal Singh, Advocates. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Through Respondent Mr. G.C. Srivastava, Advocate with Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roychaudhri, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Akash Vajpai, Advocates ITA No.92/2014 Daikin Airconditioning India Pvt. Ltd. Through ..Appellant Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advo...
Shiv Lal @ Lala Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.608/2013 Judgment Reserved On:10. h March 2015 % Judgment Delivered On:16. h March, 2015 . Appellant SHIV LAL @ LALA Through: Mr. Chetan Anand, Advocate. versus STATE ..Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for State CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Challenge in this appeal, filed under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, is to the judgment dated 17.09.2012 and the order on sentence dated 18.09.2012 whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 5,000/- has been imposed for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC and in default of payment of fine simple imprisonment for a period of one year more.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the trial court, is that:On 26.02.2008 at about 6:15pm the accused started quarrelling with his mother Vedwati and when deceased Mamta (w...
Charan Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 718/2015 Judgment reserved on:12. 03.2015 % Judgment pronounced on:16. 03.2015 CHARAN SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. V.K. Sharma, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. Sameer Sharma and Ms. Nidhi Raman and Ms. Nikhita, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the CGIT) dated 21.01.2013 whereby his claim was dismissed.2. From the facts of the case, it is evident that initially the dispute was referred for adjudication to the CGIT vide order No.L42012/136/98-IR(DU), New Delhi dated 30.11.98 with following terms:Whether the action of the management of Carpet Weaving Training Centre in terminating the services of Shri Charan Singh is legal and justified?. I...
Chander Dev @ Karu @ Dada Vs. The State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY04 2015 DECIDED ON : MARCH16 2015 + CRL.A.1204/2013 CHANDER DEV @ KARU @ DADA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Jatin Rajput with Mr.Anupam Dubey, Advocates (DHCLSC) versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 12.01.2011 in Sessions Case No.168/09 arising out of FIR No.184/07 registered at Police Station Mayapuri by which the appellant Chanderdev @ Karu @ Dada was held guilty for committing offence under Sections 376 (2) (f) IPC, the instant appeal has been preferred by him. By an order dated 14.01.2011, the appellant was awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 2,000/-.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 16.05.2007 in between 9:30 a.m. to 10:41 a.m. at H.No.WZ-553, E/2, Nangalraja, Ambedkar Basti, New Delhi, the appellant committed rape upon prosecutrix X (assumed name) aged around...
Sanjeev Mahajan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1349/2014 Judgment reserved on 04.02.2015 Judgment delivered on16.03.2015 SANJEEV MAHAJAN Through: Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate Versus STATE Through: Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the state with Inspector Ajay Kumar, PS-Jahangir Puri. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, is directed against the impugned judgment dated 19.12.2013 and order of sentence dated 24.05.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.217/09 convicting the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 27/54/59 of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302 IPC with fine of Rs. 6,000/- and in default to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months. The appellant was also sentenced to und...
Tara Chauhan and Anr. Vs. Pradeep Kumar, Gm, N. Railway and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: March 13, 2015 + CONT.CAS(C) 803/2014 TARA CHAUHAN & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.K.Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Prashant Singh, Adv. Versus PRADEEP KUMAR, GM, N. RAILWAY & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. R.V.Sinha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby initiating the contempt proceedings for not complying with the directions as contained in common order/judgment dated 19.08.2014 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.5111/2014, 5146/2014 and 5162/2014 as well as order dated 31.10.2014 passed in CM Appl. No.17593/2014 in W.P. (C) No.5111/2014 whereby further clarified the directions contained in para 13(v) of the said judgment and reiterated the directions to entertain/accept the applications of 100% blind category candidates and allowed them to participate in the recruitment test.2. Init...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Abhishek Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On : February 24, 2015 Judgment Delivered On :March 13, 2015 + LPA3392014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.K.K.Rai, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Rahul Ranjan Verma, Advocate versus ABHISHEK YADAV Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. An advertisement was issued by the first appellant : Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. in January 2012, inviting applications to fill up 477 vacancies for the post of Administrative Officer (Scale-I) in different specialized disciplines. The essential educational qualification prescribed in the advertisement for Group I code 09, (Generalist) was, Bachelor Degree with minimum 60% marks in aggregate or Masters Degree with minimum 55% marks from a recognized university. 2. The respondent, Abhishek Yadav submitted an application for a post ...
Charanjeet Gaba Vs. Arjun Lal Ahuja and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:13. 03.2015 CRL.L.P. 96/2014 CHARANJEET GABA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manish Gandhi and Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocates versus ARJUN LAL AHUJA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Naresh K Daksh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present leave petition preferred under Section 378 Cr PC is directed against the order dated 05.10.2013 passed by Sh. J.R. Aryan, District & Sessions Judge, North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Crl Appeal No.13/2009, titled Sh. Arjun Lal Ahuja & Anr. V. Sh. Charanjeet Gaba.2. By the impugned judgement, the appeal preferred by the respondent/accused had been allowed and the judgment of the learned MM Sh. Amit Kumar in Case No.129/2004 rendered on the complaint preferred by the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (the Act) convicting the respondents, was set aside.3. The case of the petitioner/complainant was tha...
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Intex Technologies (India) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment pronounced on: March 13, 2015 I.A. No.6735/2014 in CS(OS) No.1045/ 2014 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL) ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. & Mrs.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mrs.Saya Choudhary Kapur, Mr.Ashutosh Kumar, Mr.B. Prashant Kumar, Mr.Saurabh Anand and Mr.Vihan Dang, Advs. versus INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Defendant Through Mr.Saikrishna Rajgopal, with Mr.J.Sai Deepak, Ms.Savni Dutt & Ms.Rachel Mamatha and Mr.Subhajit Banerji, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of rights in eight patents registered in India alongwith damages/rendition of accounts and delivery up etc.2. Alongwith the plaint the plaintiff has filed the interim application being I.A. No.6735/2014 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC. By this order, I propose to decide the a...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »