Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 17 2015

Sarjeet Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 05, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : March 17, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1721/2014 SARJEET SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Shashi Kiran and Mr.Abhiuday Chandra, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The writ petitioner challenges the order dated October 31, 2012 passed by Summary Security Force Court holding the petitioner guilty of the three charges framed against him and inflicting the punishment of dismissal from service.2. Though the statutory petition was rejected by the DG, BSF on April 18, 2013, the same has not been challenged in the writ petition but ignoring the technicalities and noticing that prior to filing of the writ petition the statutory petition also stood rejected, we treat this writ petition challenging the order by the Statutory Auth...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Hari Kishan Vs. Ranjeet

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

$ 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:17. 03.2015 CRL.L.P. 151/2015 & CRL MA39732015 HARI KISHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jai Prakash, Advocate versus RANJEET ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The present leave petition has been preferred under Section 378(4) Cr PC to seek leave to appeal against the judgment dated 13.01.2015 passed by Sh. Jagmohan Singh, MM (NI Act)-03 Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in CC No.6485/2014, whereby the respondent/accused has been acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act).2. The case of the petitioner/complainant in his complainant was that he had advanced a friendly loan of Rs.23,70,000/- to the accused in the month of June-July 2008. The accused had undertaken to repay the same before January 2009. In discharge of his liability towards the complainant, the accused issued two post dated cheques, one dated 21.08.200...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Smt Shanta Gupta Vs. Shri Babu Ram

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h March, 2015 % + CM(M) 61/2014 SMT ANJALI GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Satya Prakash Gupta, Advocate. versus SHRI BABU RAM Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Mr. Pankaj Garg and Mrs. Manju, Advocates. CM(M) 63/2014 SHRI JAGDISH PARSHAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Satya Prakash Gupta, Advocate. versus SHRI BABU RAM Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Mr. Pankaj Garg and Mrs. Manju, Advocates. CM(M) 72/2014 SMT SHANTA GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Satya Prakash Gupta, Advocate. versus SHRI BABU RAM Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Mr. Pankaj Garg and Mrs. Manju, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) CM No.1178/2014 (Exemption) in CM(M) 61/2014 CM No.1186/2014 (Exemption) in CM(M) 63/2014 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 61/2014 and CM No.1177/2014 (Stay) CM(M) 63/2014 and CM No.1185/2014 (Stay) CM(M) 72/2014 and CM No.1249/2014 (Stay) ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Rachna Kumari Prasad Vs. Shyama Prasad Mukherji College (for Women) an ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 955/2015 & C.M.No.1684/2015 17th March, 2015 % RACHNA KUMARI PRASAD Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Sriparna Chatterjee with Ms.Soumitra Chatterjee, Advocates. versus SHYAMA PRASAD MUKHERJI COLLEGE (FOR WOMEN) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Saurabh Banerjee with Mr.Sumit Nagpal, Advocates for R-1. Mr.Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constituion of India, an ex parte ad interim order was passed on 02.2.2015. Today it transpires that the petitioner, in fact, has misled this Court in seeking the said interim order, inasmuch as, though in the writ petition, the petitioner has stated that she was a general category candidate however the appointment now which is being made to the post is not to a general category post because the general category post has been converted t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Smt Anjali Gupta Vs. Shri Babu Ram

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Tarunjeet Kaur Vs. School Management of G.H.P.S., Hemkunt Colony and O ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7635/2013 17th March, 2015 % TARUNJEET KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Advocate. versus SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF G.H.P.S., HEMKUNT COLONY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Nikhita Khetrapal, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is an employee of the respondent no.1/School, impugns the order dated 24.10.2013 passed by the respondent no.2/Society transferring the petitioner from the respondent no.1/Hemkunt Colony branch school to the Loni Road branch of the School. The respondent no.1 itself has thereafter passed a Relieving-cum-Transfer order dated 28.10.2013 whereby the petitioner has been transferred to the Loni Road branch of the School.2. The issue with r...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

M/S D K Engineers and Builders Vs. M/S National Agriculture Co-Operati ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 230/2015 Decided on:17. h March, 2015 % M/S D K ENGINEERS & BUILDERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prashant Kumar Mittal, Advocate. versus M/S NATIONAL AGRICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD (NAFED) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J (ORAL) 1. The Petitioner was awarded contract for conversion of existing Ice Factory into warehouse and additional construction adjacent thereto at Lawrence Road, New Delhi by the Respondent No.1 which was to be completed within four months upto 4th November, 1993 subject to the physical vacant site and proper drawings of construction and specifications being handed over.2. It is the case of the Petitioner that due to failure of Respondent No.1 the work could not be completed and disputes arose between the parties. Since Respondent No.1 failed to appoint an Arbitrator, the Petitioner filed an application u...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Shri Jagdish Parshad Vs. Shri Babu Ram

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

M/S Radlay Metal Products Pvt Ltd and Anr Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order Pronounced on: March 17, 2015 CRL.M.C. 388/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.1520/2015 M/S RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Tannmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Rakesh Malhotra & Mr.S.C.Verma, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State. Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Tanwar Mir & Mr.Govind Rishi, Advs. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 390/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.1524/2015 M/S RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Tannmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Rakesh Malhotra & Mr.S.C.Verma, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State. Mr.Amit Sibal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Tanwar Mir & Mr.Govind Rishi, Advs. for R-2. + CRL.M.C. 391/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.1526/2015 M/S RADLAY METAL PRODUCTS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Tannmaya Mehta, Adv. with Mr.Rakesh Malhotra & Mr.S.C.Verma, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2015

Mrs. Kanchan Batheja Vs. Mr. Pramod Batheja and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 815/2012 & I.A. 20371/2013 MRS. KANCHAN BATHEJA ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Neha Sharma, Advocate with Mr. D. Verma, Advocate. versus MR. PRAMOD BATHEJA & OTHERS Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision :17. h March, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for recovery of Rs.1,47,50,000/- along with pendente lite and future interest and for declaration, delivery up and cancellation of Memorandum of Family Settlement purportedly executed on 04th September, 2010.2. On 30th July, 2013, this Court had framed the following issues:(i) Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a decree in the sum together with interest as prayed for?. OPP (ii) CS(OS) 815/2012 September, 2010 is liable to be declared as illegal, null and void as claimed by the Plaintiff?. OPP (iii) Whether the Plaintiff has received the entire amount as claimed by her?. OPD (iv) Whether the plaint is liable ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.