Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union Public Service Commission Vs. Dr. Mahesh Mangalat
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27th February, 2015 Date of Decision:17. h March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 7431/2011 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. versus DR. MAHESH MANGALAT ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shomona Khanna, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P.VAISH JUDGMENT1 The present Writ Petition has been filed assailing the order dated 20.07.2011 passed in Appeal No.CIC/SM/A/2011/000270/SG by the Central Information Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as CIC). Through the said order CIC directed the petitioners Public Information Officer (hereinafter referred to as PIO) to provide complete information sought by the appellant/respondent (Dr. Mahesh Mangalat) as per available records, which included the Names, designation and address of the members of the Selection Committee.2. The facts as borne out from the present petition are that respondent vide letter dated 24.04.2010 soug...
Balwant Singh Vs. Sanjay Malhotra and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 87/2015 & CM33802015 (stay) Reserved on:25. h February, 2015 Decided on:17. h March, 2015 % BALWANT SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Arun Vohra with Mr. Dilip Kumar, Advs. versus SANJAY MALHOTRA & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Aggrieved by the order dated 20th August, 2014 whereby the application of the petitioner seeking leave to defend was dismissed the petitioner prefers the present petition.2. Property bearing No.HS-23, Kailash Colony Market, New Delhi was owned by Baldev Raj Malhotra on whose demise the same devolved on his legal heirs. Respondent No.1 is the son of late Baldev Raj Malhotra and respondent No.2 to 6 are the legal heirs of late Rajesh Malhotra, another son of late Baldev Raj Malhotra being the wife and four children. In the eviction petition the respondents pleaded that Baldev Raj Malhotra and his wife Saroj Malhotra died leaving behin...
Havells India Ltd and Anr Vs. Amritanshu Khaitan and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 107/2015 HAVELLS INDIA LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Chander Mohan Lall with Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee, Mr. Jaya Mandelia, Mr. Karan Bajaj, Ms. Rukma George and Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocates versus AMRITANSHU KHAITAN & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Seth and Mr. Ankur Sehghal, Advocates Reserved on : Date of Decision % 25th February, 2015 :17. h March, 2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 850/2015 [U/o. 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC].1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining misleading and disparaging advertising, slander of the plaintiffs product, dilution, damages/ rendition of accounts, delivery up, etc.2. Plaintiffs in the present suit have impugned the promotional campaign / advertising of the defendants wherein they have compared their product i.e. Eveready LED Bulb with the plaintiffs product i.e. Havells LED Bulb as according to the...
Delhi Development Authority and Ors. Vs. Competition Commission of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h March, 2015 % + LPA No.154/2015 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .. Appellants Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, ASG with Mr. Rahul Goel, Ms. Anu Monga and Mr. Neeraj Lalwani, Advs. Versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR.. Respondents Through: Mr. Pallav Saxena, Adv. for R-1. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 23rd February, 2015 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of CM No.2982/2015 filed by the appellants for clarification of the order dated 12 th January, 2015 disposing of the W.P.(C) No.6892/2014 preferred by the appellants.2. The counsel for the respondent No.1 Competition Commission of India (CCI) appears on advance notice and considering the nature of the controversy and with the consent of the ASG for the appellant and the counsel for the respondent No.1 CCI, we have heard them finally...
Latoor Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.10/2000 Reserved on:12. 02.2015 Date of decision:17. 03.2015 LATOOR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Varun Goswami, Advocate. Insp.M.C.Pandey, P.S.Seelam Pur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.1. Latoor Singh has been convicted by judgment dated 21.12.1999 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara, New Delhi, in Session Case No.44/1999 (refer FIR No.216/1999 PS, Seelampur) for murdering his wife Govindi Devi by burning her. By the order dated 22.12.1999, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life, pay fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for two years for the offence under section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short).2. On 23.03.1999, Govindi Devi, (deceased) was admitted in Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shah...
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs. Jitender Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On : March 04, 2015 Judgment Delivered On :March 17, 2015 + LPA4962013 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ...Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajat Katyal, Mr.Rishab Kaushik and Mr.Suvarna Kashyap, Advocates versus JITENDER KUMAR Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Varun Prasad, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Instant appeal brings out the necessity for Courts, while exercising writ jurisdiction, to be careful if the writ petition relates to a challenge to an award by an Industrial Adjudicator under the ID Act, 1947. The care being to ensure that the case projected by the petitioner conforms to the case pleaded before the Industrial Adjudicator. Further, one has to be careful in considering the Annexures filed with the writ petition; and it to be ensured that the Annexures were documents proved before the Industrial Adjudicator.2. A writ petition...
Gobind Lal Vs. Akshay
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 349/2012 and CM No.12857/2012 (Stay) Reserved on:10. h March, 2015 Decided on:17. h March, 2015 % GOBIND LAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pramod Ahuja with Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Advocates. versus AKSHAY Through ..... Respondent Mr. Ashish Lal with Ms. Neha Garg, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The Petitioner challenges the order dated 29th February, 2012 whereby the leave to defend application filed by the Petitioner in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) filed by the Respondent was disallowed and the eviction order was passed.2. In the eviction petition the Respondent stated that he was the owner of Property bearing No.4698 and 4700 having area of 17.5 sq.yards on the ground floor, 34 sq.yards on the first floor, second floor and third floor. The third floor of the property No.4698 was purchased from Ram Chander Bhawsar vide Sale Deed dated 19th Sep...
Neha Gupta Vs. University of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 1359/2014 NEHA GUPTA ..... Petitioner versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Anant Bhushan. For the Respondent : Mr Amit Bansal, Ms Seema Dolo and Ms Manisha Singh for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.19581/2014 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1359/2014 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the respondent be directed to grant provisional registration to the petitioner for a Ph.D. Programme in the Department of Community Medicine. The petitioner is a qualified graduate who has completed her full time Bachelors Degree Course in Dental Surgery and has been conferred a degree of Bachelor of Dental Surgery by MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly. The petitioner is currently working as a Senior R...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Sh. Hukam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.C.REF.01/2014 Reserved on:25. 02.2015 Date of decision:17. 03.2015 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashish Singh, Amicus Curiae. versus SH. HUKAM SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Dr. Rakesh Gosain and Mr.Rajeshwar Singh, Advocates with SDM in person. Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Charu Dalal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.1. A reference was made on 19.05.2011 by the learned ACMM II, New Delhi, against the Respondent Hukam Singh, the then SDM/the Local Health Authority (LHA for short) who was entrusted with the responsibility of keeping two sealed samples of article of food which was collected from the premises of one Brijender Kumar in connection with the complaint case no.63/2011 (Food Inspector (Delhi Administration) vs. Brijender Kumar) registered under Section 16(1A) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act for...
Jcl Infra Ltd. (Formerly Known as J.Sons Co. Ltd.) Vs. Govt. of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-17-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on March 10, 2015 Judgment delivered on March 17, 2015 + O.M.P.(I) 19/2015 JCL INFRA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS J.SONS CO. LTD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Raman Kapoor, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Aviral Tiwari, Mr.R.P.Singh, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, inter alia, seeking an injunction against the respondents from encashing three bank guarantees bearing Nos. 1050210BG0001026 for Rs.66,86,313/-, Rs.1050210BG0001008 for Rs.14,69,450/- and 1001113BG0000130 for Rs.20,00,000/-.2. When the matter was listed on February 13, 2015, this Court had directed the respondents to maintain status quo with regard to invocation of the aforesaid three bank guarantees. The facts:3. On March 29, 2010, the respondents had invited tenders...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »