Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shipping Corpn. of India Vs. Monica India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:24. 02.2015 Date of Decision:18.03 2015 + CS(OS) 1397/2000 SHIPPING CORPN. OF INDIA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Shantanu Sagar, Advocate. versus MONICA INDIA AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr.R.K.Sonkiya, Advocate for D-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.83,29,000-/ for alleged detention charges upto to the date of the filing of the suit. A decree is prayed for against defendants No.1 to 5 to pay jointly and severally the said amount. Regarding defendant No.6, it is prayed that the suit be decreed against the said defendant for such amount as this court may think fit of the amount claimed.2. As per the plaint the plaintiff is a Government owned shipping company. It is averred that defendant No.1 a firm imported consignments under three different Bills of Lading. Defendants No.2 to 5 were the partners of defendant No.1 on the date of imp...
Kamal Mitra Chenoy and Anr Vs. M/S Dunlop India Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:February 19, 2015 Date of Decision: March 18, 2015 + CS(OS) 3391/2012 KAMAL MITRA CHENOY & ANR .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal,Mr.Amitabh Chaturvedi and Ms.Ekta Sukharmani, Advs. versus M/S DUNLOP INDIA LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sudhir Nadrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. C. Mukund and Mr.Ashok Kumar Jain, Advs.for D-1 and D-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.9291/2013 1. This is an application filed under Order XII Rule 6 CPC to pass a decree in terms of the relief sought in the Plaint. As per the amended plaint the plaintiff has filed the present suit for eviction, possession, permanent injunction and damages/mesne profits for property bearing No.19 in Block No.171, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi.2. It is the averment in the plaint that the suit property was let out to defendant No.1 company by virtue of a registered lease agreement dated 31.7.2009. The ...
Pravesh Miglani Vs. Punam Anand Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 144/2015 and CM No.3110/2015 (Stay) Reserved on:23. d February, 2015 Decided on:18. h March, 2015 % PRAVESH MIGLANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Bhaduri and Ms. Kirti Parmar, Advocates. versus PUNAM ANAND KUMAR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Naveen K. Chaoudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The Respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for ejectment, recovery of money of Rs.36,767/-, use and occupation charges/mesne profit and interest against the Petitioner/defendant. In the plaint it was pleaded that late Mrs.Veena Paintal had let out the premises to the Petitioner/Defendant for residential purposes at monthly rent of Rs.55,00/- vide Lease Deed dated 29th June, 2000 for a period of 11 months which expired on 31 st May, 2001 and thereafter there was no renewal of the Lease Deed though the rent was being paid from month to month basis. Mrs.Veena Paintal terminated the tenancy of the Petitioner/Defendant in respect of t...
D.S. Ahluwalia Vs. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 9169/2014 and CM No.20861/2014 D.S. AHLUWALIA .... Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Vinay K. Shailendra, Ms Worthing Kasar and Mr Vaibhav Asthana : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha : Mr Pawan Mathur and Mr Himanshu Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is th...
Veer Bahadur Singh @ Veeru Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h March, 2015 + Crl.A. 1088/2012 VEER BAHADUR SINGH @ VEERU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.O.P.Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Inderpal from Police Station Rajouri Garden. Crl.A. 820/2013 KESHAV KUMAR @SAJAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Jasbir Kaur, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Manohar Lal, Police Station Rajouri Garden, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in these two appeals is to the judgment dated 02.12.2011 and order on sentence dated 14.12.2011 qua accused Veer Bahadur Singh and order on sentence dated 15.04.2013 qua appellant Keshav Kumar alias Sajan, vide which both the appellants were convicted under Section 307/397/34 IPC as under and were sentenced as under:(i) Under...
Ms Krishna Rajauria @ Krishna Saini Vs. Government of National Capital ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 9162/2014 and CM No.20851/2014 MS KRISHNA RAJAURIA @ KRISHNA SAINI .... Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Vinay K. Shailendra, Ms Worthing Kasar and Mr Vaibhav Asthana : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr Sunil Kumar Jha : Mr Pawan Mathur and Mr Himanshu Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition pr...
Prabhsimranjeet Singh and Ors. Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 18, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1031/2015 PRABHSIMRANJEET SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ajay Paul, Advocate versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Shrigopal Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.608/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 15th February, 2014 (Annexure-B), arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by SI Shrigopal on the basis of identity proof produced by he...
Dr. Syed Tanvir Hussain Vs. University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.546/2014 & W.P.(C) No.3897/2014 18th March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.546/2014 DR. SYED TANVIR HUSSAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aditya Gaur, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Bajrang Vats, Adv. for R-3 to R5. Mr. Shad Anwar and Mr. Harbir Chaudhary, Adv. for R-6. + W.P.(C) No.3897/2014 DR. RAVI DEVI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raj Kumar Sherawat, Adv. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. Through: WP(C) 546/2014 & WP(C) 3897/2014 ..... Respondents Mr.G.S.Chaturvedi, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. Page 1 of 14 Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. S.P.Singh, Mr. N.P.Singh and Mr. C.Mishra, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.546/2014 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Consitution of India, petitioner seeks the relief of quashing of the selection process conducted by t...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kaila Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:18. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 280/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Advocate versus KAILA DEVI & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. V.K.Vashistha, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. Appellant Oriental Insurance Company Limited impugns the judgment dated 11.02.2014 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `7,06,608/- was awarded for the death of Chhotey @ Chhotey Lal, a bachelor who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which took place on 21.11.2006 within the jurisdiction of Police Station Sahibabad, Ghaziabad.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased was working as an auto rickshaw (TSR) driver and was earning `7,500/- per month. It was further claimed that the deceased used to give a sum of `6,000/- per month to his mother, Respondent No.1 ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Prem Rani and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 885/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. versus PREM RANI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ashok Popli, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant New India Assurance Company Limited (the insurer) seeks recovery rights against the owner for having paid the compensation of `6,18,304/- for the death of Sh. Dayanand Arora, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 09.11.2007.2. The facts of the case are not very much in dispute. It is amply proved on record that the vehicle involved in the accident was a TSR bearing registration no.DL-1RJ-1812. The permit holder of the TSR was one Manjit Singh, who had been examined as R2W1. The TSR in question was being driven by one Jawahar Mehto at the time of the accident. In his cross-examination, R2W1, Manjit Singh (the insured...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »