Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Radha Rani Gupta Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2015 % + LPA No.255/2004 RADHA RANI GUPTA Through: .... Appellant Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg, Sr. Adv./ Amicus Curiae with Mr. Imran Ahmad Abhasi, Mr. Pushpinder Yadav & Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Arti Singh & Ms. Pooja Singh, Advs. for UCO Bank. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 21st January, 2004 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.1318/2000 preferred by the appellant. The appellant had preferred the said writ petition impugning the orders dated 22nd July, 1999 and 19th August, 1999 of the respondent No.2 being the Disciplinary Authority of UCO Bank imposing punishment, in respect of one charge sheet against the appellant of lowering of basic pay by two stages for a period of two years, for each of the two charges levelled, to run with concurren...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Sadhna Grover and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2015 % + LPA2402006 & CM No.12177/2012 (of R-1 for dismissal of appeal) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Mini Pushkarna and Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advs. Versus SADHNA GROVER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Hameed S. Shaikh, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Pawan Mathur and Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Advs. for R2/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the orders dated 22nd November, 2005 and 30th November, 2005 of the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.6827/1999 filed by the respondent No.1 [respondent No.2 is the Delhi Development Authority (DDA)].. Vide order dated 22nd November, 2005, the appellant Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) was directed to allot to the respondent No.1/writ petitioner on license basis, 200 sq. yrds. of land for running a coal depot. Vide subsequent order dated 30th Nov...
Sandisk International Ltd. Vs. The Designated Authority and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:12. h March, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:18. h March, 2015 % + WP(C) 744/2015 & CM Nos. 1319/2015, 2662/2015 SANDISK INTERNATIONAL LTD. .....Petitioner versus THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS. ....Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: For the Respondents: Mr Balbir Singh, Mr V.Lakshmikumaran, Mr Bhargav Mansatta, Mr Atul Gupta, Mr T.D. Satish, Mr Angad Sadhu and Mr Rupinder Simhar, Advocates. Mr Vivek Goyal, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4, Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr Advocate with Mr Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent Nos.5 & 6. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J1 The petitioner, a Company established in Ireland has impugned the final findings dated 19.12.2014 issued by the Designated Authority (DA). The subject goods in respect of which the final findings have been rendered are USB Flash Drives. ============================...
K.C.Sharma Vs. Bses Yamuna Power Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 11, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : March 18, 2015 + LPA No.646/2013 K.C. SHARMA Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Piyush Sharma, Advocate versus BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sandeep Prabhakar, Advocate with Mr.Vikas Mehta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The intra-court appeal arises out of the order dated 28th February, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition(C) No.2107/2000 filed by the appellant, whereby the learned Single Judge has, after setting aside the orders dated 21st October, 1999 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and 2nd February, 2000 passed by the Appellate Authority, required the Disciplinary Authority to pass a speaking order.2. The appellant, Sh.K.C.Sharma, when working as an Assistant Accountant in the office of AFO (D) YVR, Delhi Vidyut Board (earlier known as Delhi Electric ...
Roshan Lal Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Developmen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2015 % + LPA No.253/2014 ROSHAN LAL Through: .. Appellant Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. .. Respondent Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Adv with Ms. Renuka Arora, Adv. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 17th January, 2014 of the Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.308/2014 preferred by the appellant.2. The writ petition from which this appeal arises was filed by the appellant impugning the cancellation dated 19th August, 2013 of the allotment in his favour of an industrial plot under the Scheme of Re-location of Industries and seeking a direction to the respondent to handover possession of the allotted industrial plot No.68, Pocket-I, Sector-2, measuring 100 sq. mtrs. at Bawana Industrial Complex, Delhi to the appellant.3. ...
Shree Krishna Paper Mills and Industries Ltd. Vs. Gail (India) Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on March 18, 2015 + OMP (I) 85/2015 SHREE KRISHNA PAPER MILLS & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocate versus GAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms.Poornima Maheshwari, Ms.Shreya Sinha, Mr.Dharmender, Advocates for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:(a) Restrain the respondent No.1 from invoking the Letters of Credit bearing Nos.6011ILCRE140001 & 6011ILCRE130001 for an amount of Rs.18,08,000/- & Rs.25,00,000/- respectively, issued by Respondent No.2, till the time the disputes are finally adjudicated by an Arbitrator; (b) Restrain the respondent No.2 from making any payment to respondent No.1 towards invocation of the 'Letters of Credit' bearing Nos.6011ILCRE140001 & 6011ILCRE130001 for an amou...
Rashmi Skadegaard Vs. Vikram Chandhok and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 01.2015 Pronounced on :18.03.2015 + CS(OS) 1386/2012 RASHMI SKADEGAARD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Arun Kumar Varma, Mr.Arun Malik, Ms.Sahiti Kachroo, Mr.A.B.Pandey and Mr.Mayank Sapra, Advs. versus VIKRAM CHANDHOK & ANR ..... Defendant Through Mr.Y.P.Narula, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhay Narula and Mr.Aniruddha Choudhary, Advs.for D-1 Ms.Madhu Smita and Mr.Saurabh Bindal, Advs.for D-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH % JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.8573/2013 in CS(OS) No.1386/2012 1. This is an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC filed on behalf of the defendant no.1 seeking rejection of the plaint.2. The plaintiff is the sister of defendant nos. 1 and 2, the two brothers. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for a decree of declaration declaring the plaintiff and defendant nos.1 and 2 as the exclusive and absolute owners of property bearing No.204, Jor Bagh, New Delhi. Relief of partition and other connected reliefs are also s...
Nirmal Gupta Vs. Yogesh Sethi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: February 04, 2015 Date of Decision: March 18, 2015 + CS(OS) 2931/2012 NIRMAL GUPTA Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms. A. Maitri, Adv. Versus YOGESH SETHI Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Amita Sehgal Mathur, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.17735/2012 (under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC) and IA No.16373/2013 (under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC) 1. The above applications are filed for confirmation of the injunction orders passed earlier/vacation of the injunction order. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from constructing or encroaching upon the vacant land of the plaintiff measuring 80 sq. yards out of a total area of 250 sq.yards falling part of Khasra No.0487 Village Piragarhi,Delhi. It is the contention of the plaintiff that he bought the said land from its earlier owner vide a registered sale deed dated 24.4.1991. It is further averred that...
Austice Dilawar @ Eustice Dilawar Vs. State (Govt. of Nct, Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :12. h SEPTEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :18. h MARCH, 2015 + CRL.A. 483/1999 AUSTICE DILAWAR @ EUSTICE DILAWAR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Chirag Khurana and Mr.Jayant Sud, Advocates. VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant Austice Dilawar @ Eustice Dilawar is aggrieved by a judgment dated 09.09.1999 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.59/88 arising out of FIR No.225/84 PS Vasant Vihar by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 306 IPC. By an order dated 10.09.1999, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 25,000/-.2. Shorn of details, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge-sheet was that on 11.08.1984 Daily Diary (DD) No.4A (Ex.PW15/A) was recorded at 10.35 A.M. at PS Vasant Vihar after getting information from ASI Veer Singh that a lady ha...
State Vs. Parveen Sharma and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.117/2014 Reserved on:18. 02.2015 Date of decision:18. 03.2015 STATE Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP. versus PARVEEN SHARMA and ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Sahni and Mr.Ashwani Bansal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.1. The present appeal on behalf of the State is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 2.9.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-02 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi in SC No.222/2009 (refer FIR No.250/2009, P.S.Malviya Nagar) whereby the Respondents herein have been acquitted of the charges under Section 302/201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short).2. The Respondents namely Praveen Sharma and Hemant Sharma were charged for murdering one Babu Lal @ Mukul in furtherance of their common intention as also for destroying the evidence of the crime by throwing the dead body and parking th...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »