Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 19 2015

Rohtash Kumar and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Delhi) and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$~12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 805/2015 ROHTASH KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. T.S. Varun, Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Archna Sharma, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Sahib Singh Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 806/2015 JAI KARAN SINGH & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. T.S. Varun, Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Archna Sharma, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Sahib Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.Cs. 805 & 806 of 2015 Page 1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of two FIRs i.e. FIR No.282/2012 under Sections 323/451/363/511/506/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C.805/2015]. and FIR No.50/2010 under Sections 323/451 of IPC [in CRL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Dr.Chetna Harjai Vs. Vikas Harjai

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$-38 & 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h March, 2015 + TR.P. (C.) 57/2014 DR.CHETNA HARJAI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Manish Garg, Advocate with Mr. Hitesh Kumar Bagri, Advocate versus VIKAS HARJAI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Rohit Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr. Narendra Kumar Goyal, Advocate TR.P.(C.) 73/2014 VIKAS HARJAI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rohit Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr. Narendra Kumar Goyal, Advocate versus DR. CHETNA ANAND Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Manish Garg, Advocate with Mr. Hitesh Kumar Bagri, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Two divorce petitions, one being HMA Petition no.112/2009 and the other being HMA Petition no.534/2013 are pending between the parties. The husband Vikas Harjai preferred the first divorce petition on the ground of cruelty sometime in 2009. Issues have been framed in the said petition and the matter is listed for evidence. On the other hand, HMA Petition no.534...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sanjeev @ Dev and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$- 15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:19. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 486/2012 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate versus SANJEEV @ DEV & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for Respondent no.1. MAC.APP. 626/2012 SANJEEV @ DEV & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus CHHATAR PAL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Respondent no.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the common judgment dated 30.01.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.8,30,000/- was awarded in favour of injured Sanjeev who suffered serious injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 04.09.2010.2. MAC.APP.486/2012 has been preferred by Appellant Bajaj Allianz General...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Mod. Sharafat and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 32/2013 U.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. versus MOD. SHARAFAT & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Arun Sharma, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.10.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `7,19,856/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 and 2 for the death of Akram, a bachelor, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 11.01.2012.2. The following contentions are raised on behalf of the Appellant:(i) The accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of motor cycle bearing registration No.UP-14BD-3415 itself and not on account of rash and negligent driving of bus bearing registration No.UP-14BT-0346, thus, the Appellant had no liabilit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Vikas Harjai Vs. Dr. Chetna Anand

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Harpiari Devi and Ors. Vs. Ram Kishan and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2015 + MAC.APP. 236/2007 HARPIARI DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. S.S.Sisodia, Adv. versus RAM KISHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Isha Khanna, Adv. for Ms. Aarti Mahajan, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. Mr. VijayChandra, Adv. with Ms. Sonia Sharma, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `3,85,000/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Inderjeet, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 05.06.2005.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of Ram Kishan, driver of the DTC bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-1895. The bus was insured with National Insurance Company Limited. The deceased was working as a supervisor with M/s. Sonia Electricals Pvt. Ltd. a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Sanjeev @ Dev and Ors. Vs. Chhatar Pal and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Shahjad Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 868/2011 Decided on 19th March, 2015 SHAHJAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A.K. Sharma, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for State with SI Vipin Kumar, P.S. Ashok Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Vide judgment dated 29th March, 2011, trial court has convicted the appellant under Sections 392/397 IPC and under Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. Vide order on sentence dated 29th March, 2011, appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of `1000/- for the offence punishable under Section 392/34 IPC; sentenced to undergo seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine of `1000/- for the offence punishable under Section 397 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of `1000/- for the offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 2015

Rakesh Chhabra Vs. Ansul Arya and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-19-2015

$~7 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 148/2014, CM Nos.18218-19/2014, 18223/2014 & 5159/2015 Date of decision:19. h March, 2015 % RAKESH CHHABRA Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manoj Kumar Sahu, Adv. versus ANSUL ARYA & ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Virendra Choudhary and Mr. Anand Verdhan Maitraya, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Rajiv Vig, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the record of CS(OS)No.411/2013 as is necessary for the effective adjudication of the present appeal has been filed by the appellant. We have been carefully taken through the record and perused the impugned judgment dated 21st July, 2014 passed by the learned Single Judge. Learned senior counsel for the appellant and learned counsels for the respondents have been heard at length.2. Respondent no.1 Anshul Arya (as plaintiff) had originally filed suit bearin...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 2015

Fertiliser Association of India (Fai) Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-18-2015

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h March, 2015 % + LPA No.94/2015 & CM No.3076/2015 (for stay) FERTILISER ASSOCIATION OF INDIA (FAI) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kaveeta Wadia & Mr. Shashank Tripathi, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Chawla with Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Ms. Divya Pandey & Mr. Ketan Paul, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 6th January, 2015 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.4898/2013 preferred by the appellant.2. The appeal came up before us first on 23rd February, 2015 when the counsel for the respondents no.1 to 5 [ (i) Union of India, (ii) Joint Secretary, Department of Fertilizers, (iii) Dy. Secretary, Department of Fertilizers; (iv) Under Secretary, Department of Fertilizers and (v) Director, Department of Fertilizers]. app...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.