Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Aditya Narayan and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2756/2015 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena & Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advocates versus ADITYA NARAYAN & ANR. ..... Respondents Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 20.03.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. Nos. 4929-4930/2015 (Exemptions) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 2756/2015 & CM APPL. Nos. 4928 & 4931/2015 Challenge in the present Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is to order dated 19.08.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) whereby the learned Tribunal had disposed of the Original Applications (in short OAs) No.3752/2012 preferred by the respondents with a direction to the petitioners to cull out the suitability of the can...
Shri Chand Aggarwal Vs. Smarth Shiksha Samiti and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7367/2014 19th March, 2015 % SHRI CHAND AGGARWAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Advocate. versus SMARTH SHIKSHA SAMITI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate with Mr. Sheel Vardhan, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The limited relief which is prayed before this Court by the petitioner is that the petitioner who ordinarily retires on 30.11.2014, should be retired not on this date but should be retired only at the end of the academic session on 30.4.2015, and as provided under Rule 110 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules).2. The issue argued on behalf of the petitioner is covered in favour of the petitioner by the judgment delivered by this Court in the case of Nutan Gulati Vs. Director of...
Rattan Mandal Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : MARCH18 2015 DECIDED ON : MARCH19 2015 + CRL.A. 283/2003 RATTAN MANDAL ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Dev Dutt, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. SI Satish Kumar, PS Lajpat Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appeal is directed against a judgment dated 18.11.2002 in Sessions Case No.01/2002 arising out of FIR No.338/2001 registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar by which the appellant Rattan Mandal was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 363/366/376 IPC. By an order dated 18.11.2002, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine `200/- under Section 376 IPC; RI for three years with fine ` 200/- under Section 366 IPC and RI for two years with fine ` 200/- under Section 363 IPC. All the substantive sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 23.08.2001 the appe...
Birju @ Mathur Bux Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : FEBRUARY24 2015 DECIDED ON : MARCH19 2015 + CRL.A. 494/2013 BIRJU @ MATHUR BUX ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Megha, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 21.01.2013 in Sessions Case No.23/12 arising out of FIR No.145/11 registered at Police Station I.P.Estate by which the appellant Birju @ Mathur Bux was held guilty for committing offences under Sections 376/363/506 IPC, the instant appeal has been preferred by him. By an order dated 24.01.2013, the appellant was awarded RI for eight years with fine ` 10,000/- under Section 376 IPC and RI for one year with ` 2,000/- each under Sections 363/506 IPC. Both the substantive sentences were to operate concurrently.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on the night intervenin...
Wilmington Trust Sp Services (Dublin) Limited Vs. Directorate General ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:05. 03.2015 Judgement delivered on:19.03.2015 % + WP(C) 871/2015 AWAS39423IRELAND LTD. & ORS. .....Petitioners Versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION & ANR. + ..... Respondents WP(C) 747/2015 WILMINGTON TRUST SP SERVICES (DUBLIN) LIMITED .....Petitioners Versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates appeared in this case: For the petitioners: Mr Kevic Setalvad, Sr. Adv. with Ms Sneha Rao & Mr Amit A. Pai, Advs. for the petitioners in WP(C) 871/2015. Mr Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr Ravi Nath, Mr Ajay Kumar, Mr Rohan Ghosh, Ms Neha Singh, Mr Karan Lahiri, Mr Rajeev Kumar, Ms Radhika Mathur, Ms Sara Sundaram & Mr Rishabh Kapur, Advs. for the petitioner in WP(C) 747/2015. For the Respondents: Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Ms Anjana Gosain, Mr Pradeep Desodya, Mr Arnab Naskar, Ms Saroj Bidawat & Mr Vidur Mohan, Advs. with Mr S. Dutta, Director (Airworthiness) & Mr M. Debula, Asstt. Direc...
Hans Raj Jain Vs. Election Commission of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.1458/2014 HANS RAJ JAIN Through: .. Petitioner Petitioner in person. Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA .. Respondent Through: Mr. P.R. Chopra & Mr. Y.R. Sharma, Advs. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), impleading the Election Commission of India (ECI) only as the respondent, seeks the reliefs of, i) a direction for cancellation of registration of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on the ground of the same having been effected on forged, wrong and incomplete documents; ii) setting up of a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to inquire into the forged and fabricated documents filed by AAP for registration with the respondent ECI, and, iii) a direction for initiation of a disciplinary proceedings against the officials of respondent ECI.2. Though notic...
Mohd Zuber and Anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h March, 2015 + CRL.A. 260/2014 MOHD ZUBER & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr.Aditya Aggarwal and Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.O.P. Saxena, APP for the State along with SI Praveen, PS Preet Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This appeal u/s 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment dated 18th January, 2014 and order on sentence dated 22nd January, 2014 vide which the appellants were convicted under Section 328/379/34 IPC, 1860 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 years along with fine of Rs.10,000/- u/s 328/34 IPC in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment and 3 years rigorous imprisonment u/s 379/34 IPC with fine of Rs.5000/- each in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Ca...
Jai Karan Singh and Ors. Vs. State (Govt of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
$~12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 805/2015 ROHTASH KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. T.S. Varun, Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Archna Sharma, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Sahib Singh Respondent No.2 in person + (ii) CRL.M.C. 806/2015 JAI KARAN SINGH & ORS Through: .....Petitioners Mr. T.S. Varun, Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Archna Sharma, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Sahib Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.Cs. 805 & 806 of 2015 Page 1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In the above captioned two petitions, quashing of two FIRs i.e. FIR No.282/2012 under Sections 323/451/363/511/506/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C.805/2015]. and FIR No.50/2010 under Sections 323/451 of IPC [in CRL...
Shri Bhoop Singh and Ors. Vs. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director North Eas ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.6483/2014 & 4488/2014 19th March, 2015 % 1. W.P.(C) No.6483/2014 SHRI BHOOP SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate. versus CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anant Parkash, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for respondent No.2.2. W.P.(C) No.4488/2014 SH. BHOOP SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Shukla, Advocate. versus CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR NORTH EASTERN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anant Parkash, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.6483/2014 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi...
Dr. Nidhi Goyal Vs. Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-19-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 7160/2014 DR. NIDHI GOYAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sagar Saxena, Ms. Vannessa Singh & Ms. Himanshi Saini, Advs. Versus FACULTY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi. Mr. T. Singhdev & Mr. Vishu Aggarwal, Advs. for MCI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The petitioner passed her final year MBBS Examination in November, 2012 from Maulana Azad Medical College and being desirous of pursuing post graduation, appeared in the All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination (AIPGMEE) held in the year 2014 and secured 122 nd rank in the General Category and was in the last round of counselling held provisionally admitted to MS (Ophthalmology) under the 50% Delhi University Quota, at University College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »