Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Equipments Leasing and Cons. Ser ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:26. 02.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:20. 03.2015 % + ITA252001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus M/S. ABHINANDAN INVESTMENT LTD. ITA8402008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI II versus MEDICARE INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA262001 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus JINDAL EQUIPMENTS LEASING & CONS. SERV. .... Respondent Through : Sh. Rohit Madan, Sh. P. Roychaudhuri and Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocates, for the Revenue. Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Adv. for assessees. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. These three appeals involve common questions of law directed against a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 05.06.2000. Initially, a Division Bench had decided the case on, 08.10.2001, reported in (2002) 254 ITR0538(Commissioner of Income Tax v. ITA Nos.25/01...
Urmila Kumari Vs. Om Prakash Jangra and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 26, 2015 Pronounced on: March 20, 2015 W.P.(C) 5580/2011 URMILA KUMARI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rishi Malhotra and Mr.B.Veeraswamy Raju, Advs. versus OM PRAKASH JANGRA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Manju Bhagat, Adv. for Mr. Vineet Bhagat, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Vinod Trisal, Adv. for R-2 and R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. The petitioner seeks to invoke the civil writ jurisdiction of this court praying for a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ for quashing the order dated 28.04.2011 passed by Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the DRAT) and the subsequent communication dated 30.06.2011 issued in its wake by LIC Housing Finance Ltd. (respondent No.3) calling upon her to surrender property No.1735, New Gita Colony, Mirzapur Road, Hissar, Haryana (hereinafter referred to as the subject propert...
Dr. Mohd. Haroon Vs. Jamia Hamdard University and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.6076/2011 20th March, 2015 DR. MOHD. HAROON ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Adv. versus JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saket Sikri, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who was appointed as a Deputy Medical Superintendant with the respondent no.3/Majeedia Hospital/Hah Centenary Hospital vide appointment letter dated 6.1.2009, seeks the relief that it should be held that petitioners services continue with respondent no.3 and that petitioner should not be held to have been taken appointment and employment with respondent no.1/Jamia Hamdard University in terms of the office order of respondent no.1 dated 7.6.2011.2. The facts of the case are that admittedly the petitioner was appointed on probation with the responde...
Rajeev Tandon and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1113/2015 & Crl.M.A. 4135/2015 RAJEEV TANDON & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vikram Dua, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Mohd. Haroon Mr. Ravi K. Chandra, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.467/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Tilak Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 9th May, 2014 arrived at Counselling Cell, Family Courts, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-3). Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Ravi K. Chandra, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, ...
Mohd Faheem Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 20, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1119/2015 & Crl.M.A.4144/2015 MOHD FAHEEM Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.B. Pandey, Advocate versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Karan Lal Mr. Viovekanand Jha, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.146/2014, under Sections 498-A/406 of IPC registered at police station Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed/Khulanama of 19th February, 2015 arrived at between the parties. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Vivekanand Jha, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 1119/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-in...
Axis Bank Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: February 26, 2015 Pronounced on: March 20, 2015 + WP(C) 6201/2014 AXIS BANK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Bhatt and Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advs. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Katyal and Mr. S. S. Katyal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. Two banks are embroiled in this litigation, each accusing the other of negligence in facilitating fraudulent encashment of two forged demand drafts by an imposter resulting in wrongful loss to one (the drawer as well as drawee), part of resultant liability having been fastened on the other (the collecting bank).2. The Original Application (OA) No.108/2004 under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the RDDBFI Act) had been instituted before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the DRT) on...
Mohd. Arif Vs. Cardio Products Corporation and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h February, 2015 Date of Decision:20. h March, 2015 % + W.P.(C) 220/2013 MOHD. ARIF Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjoy Ghose Advocate versus CARDIO PRODUCTS CORPORATION AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Agarwal, Adv. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court V, Karkardooma Court, Delhi in I.D. No.1/2012.2. Brief facts as borne out from the petition are that the petitioner was employed by respondent No.1 as a Sales and Service Engineer on probation for a period of six months. Respondent No.1 withheld the salary of the petitioner in August 2011 under the pretext of financial crunch. On 11.10.2011, the petitioner demanded his salary however, one Mr. Surender Singh, Chief Executive of respond...
M/S Gabs and Ors Vs. State Bank of Patiala and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:20. 03.2015 + W.P. (C) 2774/2015 C.M. No.4962-4963/2015 M/S GABS & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Katyal with Ms. Vinny Shangloo, Advocates. versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kakra with Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates for R-1/SBOP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjeev Kakra, Advocate accepts notice. With consent, the petition was heard finally.2. The petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is aggrieved by an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 27.05.2014 made in two applications filed by the respondent (hereafter referred to as the Bank), i.e., OA592005 and OA792005.3. The DRT had for the same reasons, dismissed the petitioners Securitisation Application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets...
Ramesh Panwar Vs. The Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2673/2015 & CM APPL. No.4777/2015 RAMESH PANWAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Lalta Prasad, Advocate versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate AND + W.P.(C) 2719/2015 & CM APPL. No.4882/2015 MAHESH KUMAR BORASIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Lalta Prasad, Advocate versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2003.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.4777/2015 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2673/2015 CM APPL. No.4882/2015 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2719/2015 Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 2673/2015 W.P.(C) 2719/2015 These Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India question the tenability of the common order dated 18.03.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi ...
Shri Sudhakar Tiwari Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 20, 2015 + OMP No.180/2015 SHRI SUDHAKAR TIWARI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K.Goyal, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Anupam Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) IA35342015 This is an application filed by the petitioner seeking exemption from filing the original copies of the documents. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. OMP No.180/2015 & IA35332015 (stay) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, in short) lay a challenge to the award dated November 13, 2014 whereby the learned Arbitrator has granted an amount of Rs.22,63,361/- as the outstanding licence fee along with interest of Rs.8,13,150/- along with pendente lite interest @ 15% p.a. till the publishing of the award in favour of the respondent DDA and in the eventuality the said amount ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »