Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 23 2015

Khiya Ram Khilwani Vs. Ravinder Machhan

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~26, 2, 13, 14, 41-44, 47, 48, 51, 52, 62, 70-74, 33-35, 30, 1, 23 & 38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) Date of Decision:23. d March, 2015 CRL.M.C. 700/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.2476/2012 NEERAV J.SHAH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K.Sachdeva, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + + + + + + + + + + + (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) (xii) .... Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Indrapal Singh, CAW Cell Mr. Tarun K. Bedi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CRL.M.C. 5435/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18534/2014 CRL.M.C. 5433/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18530/2014 CRL.M.C. 5437/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18538/2014 CRL.M.C. 789/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2979/2015 CRL.M.C. 790/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2982/2015 CRL.M.C. 791/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2984/2015 CRL.M.C. 792/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2986/2015 CRL.M.C. 795/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2992/2015 CRL.M.C. 796/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2994/2015 CRL.M.C. 934/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3495/2015 CRL.M.C. 935/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3497/201...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

B. Narayana Prasanna Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:23. d March, 2015 % + Crl. M.C. No.5710/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.19492/2014 B. NARAYANA PRASANNA ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Deepak Pathak & Mr.Raghav Chadha, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through ..... Respondent Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP for the State along with SI Manish Kumar, PS Anand Parbat, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the instant petition is invoking inherent powers of this Court as envisaged under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to assail the order dated 7th August, 2013 passed by the ACMM in case FIR No.39/2009, PS Anand Parbat and the order dated 6th May, 2014 passed by the ASJ, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Criminal Revision Petition No.161/2013, by which the Revisionist Court dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order of ACMM taking cognizance of the offence under Section 175 IPC and summoned the petitioner ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Anil D Kaneria and Anr. Vs. M/S Orient Bell Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Mahadev Naag @ Mahesh and Anr Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:23. d March, 2015 % + Crl. M.C. No.5908/2014 MAHADEV NAAG @ MAHESH & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.P.K.Mishra, Adv. with Ms. Kamini Kaushal, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State along with ASI Omkar, PS Dwarka South, in person. None for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.60/2012, under Sections 323/342/370/ 374/34 IPC, Sections 23/26 of Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, Section 16 of Bonded Labour Act and Sections 14/3 of Child Labour Prohibition Act, 1986, registered at P.S. Dwarka South, New Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that on the basis of the complaint made by respondent No.2, the aforesaid FIR was registered on 30th March, 2012 initially against Dr.Sanjay Verma and Dr.Sumita Verma. The petitioners, n...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Anoop Singh and Ors Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~13 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 9314/2014 & CM211052014 ANOOP SINGH & ORS ... Petitioners versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners For the Respondent DDA For the Respondent R-1. : Mr Sudhanshu Tomar. : Mr Arjun Pant : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the respondent has handed over the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as the averments contained in the writ petition would be relied upon.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referre...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) Vs. Ravi @ Dabbu and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION No.168/2015 Date of decision:23. d March 2015 % STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) . Appellant Through: Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State versus RAVI @ DABBU & ORS. ..Respondents Through: None CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J.1. By the present leave petition filed under section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the state seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 17.12.2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.96/2011, whereby the respondents (accused before the trial court) were acquitted of the charges punishable under section 302/397/34 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The facts of the case, as noticed by the learned trial court, are as under:On 08.08.2011, information was received at P.S. Timarpur vide D.D.No.14 A with respect to a person lying in an injured condition near road going from Nehru Vihar tow...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Naseeb Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 146/2011 Decided on 23rd March, 2015 NASEEB ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Mr. Vivek Kr. Singh and Mr. Sidhartha Shankar, Advs. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State along with SI Vivek Sharma, P.S. Gokul Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 489-C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, hereinafter referred to as IPC) by trial court and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of `50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. Aggrieved by his conviction as also sentence awarded to him, appellant has preferred this appeal.2. Prosecution story, as unfolded, is that on 14th September, 2004, SI Jagbir Singh along with Const. Raj Kumar, Const. Shyam Lal and Const. Harinder was patrolling in the area fallin...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

State(Govt of Nct Delhi) Vs. Umesh and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~ 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1387/2014 Judgment dated 23th March, 2015 % STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Advocate versus UMESH & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Ms.Sana Ansari, Amicus curiae CRL.A.1132/2014 UMESH Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Sana Ansari, Amicus curiae versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Advocate + CRL.A.1134/2014 DEVRAZ Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Sana Ansari, Amicus curiae versus STATE(GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Feroz Khan Ghazi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Appeal No.1387/2014 has been filed by the State assailing the judgment of the trial court dated 19.7.2014 and order on sentence dated 24.7.2014. The appeal is restricted to the order on sentence dated 24.7.2014, by which the respondents have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three month...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015