Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Mar 23 2015

M/S Sharma Foundation Vs. B B Joshi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~26, 2, 13, 14, 41-44, 47, 48, 51, 52, 62, 70-74, 33-35, 30, 1, 23 & 38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) Date of Decision:23. d March, 2015 CRL.M.C. 700/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.2476/2012 NEERAV J.SHAH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K.Sachdeva, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + + + + + + + + + + + (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) (xii) .... Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Indrapal Singh, CAW Cell Mr. Tarun K. Bedi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CRL.M.C. 5435/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18534/2014 CRL.M.C. 5433/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18530/2014 CRL.M.C. 5437/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18538/2014 CRL.M.C. 789/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2979/2015 CRL.M.C. 790/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2982/2015 CRL.M.C. 791/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2984/2015 CRL.M.C. 792/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2986/2015 CRL.M.C. 795/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2992/2015 CRL.M.C. 796/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2994/2015 CRL.M.C. 934/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3495/2015 CRL.M.C. 935/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3497/201...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Balchandra S Bakhle Vs. Modelama Exports Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Ravinder Kumar Jain Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~71 THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 03.2015 W.P.(C) 6912/2014 & CM162922014 RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Amit Gupta : Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak with Mr Sunil Kumar Jha : Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the respondent has handed over the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.2. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as the averments contained in the writ petition would be relied upon.2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettl...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Vrajendra Nath Gupta Vs. Sir Ganga Ram Trust Society and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 23, 2015 + RSA1172012 VRAJENDRA NATH GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.P. Singh Dhakray and Mr. Shakti Singh Dhakray, Advocates versus SIR GANGA RAM TRUST SOCIETY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. N.P. Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT Appellant had sought the declaration from trial court that his termination from service was illegal. While relying upon respondents rules and regulations governing its employees, trial court found it to be so. Whereas First Appellate Court vide impugned order of 23rd April, 2012 has held that termination of appellants service is in consonance with the contract of his employment. The bare facts which emerge from the impugned judgment are that Appellant was appointed by respondents as Senior Pharmacy Store Officer with Sir Ganga Ram Hospital w.e.f. 7th January, 1993 and was kept on probation for one year. Upon successful completion of period of probation, a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Mahesh Chand Garg and Ors. Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 23, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5234/2014 MAHESH CHAND GARG & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.B. Gupta, Mr. Sarvesh Rai, Mr. Udyan Srivastava and Mr. Sanyam Khetrapal, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of Complaint No.131A/1 under Sections 420/511/468/ 471/114 of IPC is sought in this petition on the basis of misunderstanding between the parties being cleared. This complaint already stands quashed for the offence under Sections 420/511/462/473/114 of IPC vide order of 18th December, 2013. Petitioners had filed an application for rectification of the order of 18 th December, 2013 to the effect that instead of Sections 462/473, the order be read for Sections 468/471 of IPC. However, petitioners application CRL.M.C. 5234/2014 Page 1 for rectification o...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Ashish Gupta and Ors. Vs. The State (the Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and An ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 23, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1149/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.4245/2015 ASHISH GUPTA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.K. Gandhi & Mr. Rajinder, Advocates versus THE STATE ( THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Pawan Tomar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.323/2007, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Prashant Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated, arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Court settlement of 4th February, 2015 (Annexure-B)s, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Pawan Tomar on the ba...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

Shri S.P.Astha Vs. Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7102/2001 23rd March, 2015 % SHRI S.P.ASTHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.L.Bhargava, Adv. Versus DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat and Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, who was a Superintending Engineer with the respondent- Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board, impugns the office order of the respondent dated 17.10.2001 whereby petitioners scale of pay was fixed at Rs.12,000 w.e.f 8.11.1997 in the pay-scale of Rs.12000-375-16500. The impugned order recalls the earlier office order dated 22.2.1999 whereby pay-scale of the petitioner was fixed at Rs.14300-400-18300 w.e.f 8.11.1997.2. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as an Assistant Engineer (AE) with the respondent whereafter he w...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015

R.S. Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zamil Infra Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2015

51 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 809/2015 R.S. INFRAPROJECTS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. S.K. Maniktala, Mr. Akshay Sharma and Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocates. versus ZAMIL INFRA PVT. LTD. AND ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision :23. d March, 2015 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) This matter has been listed in pursuance to a special mentioning being allowed by the Honble Judge Incharge (Original Side). I.A. 6083/2015 in CS(OS) 809/2015 Heard. The production of original documents is dispensed with as prayed for in the application subject to the plaintiff producing the same as and when so directed. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. I.A. 6084/2015 in CS(OS) 809/2015 Plaintiff is permitted to pay the shortfall in the Court-fees within a period of three days. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. CS(OS) 809/2015 Let the plaint be regi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2015