Delhi Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxman Singh, Cisf Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: March 18, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: March 23,2015 % + W.P.(C) 1401/2014 LAXMAN SINGH, CISF Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.T.P.Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The petitioner is a young recruit who was enrolled as a Constable (GD) in CISF in the year 2009. He has assailed the order dated December 10, 2012 passed by the Disciplinary Authority whereby penalty of removal from service has been inflicted on the petitioner for the misconduct that while performing duty in B shift from 14:00 hrs to 22:00 hrs on July 23, 2012, he assaulted one Sonu, a private guard of Bedi and Bedi Company and Ct.Ashok Kumar Jena of CISF at the Rajender Place Metro Station. Statutory remedy availed by the petitioner did not yield the desire...
Chand Singh Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :12. h FEBRUARY, 2015 DECIDED ON :23. d MARCH, 2015 + CRL.A. 176/2002 CHAND SINGH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Aggrieved by a judgment dated 05.03.2002 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.90/01 arising out of FIR No.46/2000 PS Dwarka, by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 376 IPC, the instant appeal has been filed by him. By an order dated 06.03.2002, he was awarded RI for five years with fine ` 10,000/-.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as set up in the charge- sheet was that on 19.03.2001 at about 03.00 P.M., after wrongfully confining X (assumed name) aged about sixteen years in his shop situated in House No.RZ G559, Raj Nagar-II, Palam Colony, the appellant sexually assaulted her after putting her in fear. The police mac...
Kirtika Mukesh Bura Vs. Jagjit Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:23. d March 2015. + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 98/2014 KIRTIKA MUKESH BURA Through: ..... Appellant Appellant in person. versus JAGJIT SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Kumar Mittal, Mr. Aman Usman, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) The appellant has filed an appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 to challenge the order dated 21st May 2014 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, South East, Saket, New Delhi, whereby the learned Family Court has dismissed the application of the appellant filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC. Assailing the legality and correctness of the impugned order dated 21st May 2014, the appellant who argued the case herself, submits that the learned Principal Judge has not appreciated the true scope and meaning of Rule 1 of Order XXIII of the CPC which is in clear contravention with the principles...
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Vs. Sh. Kamal Kant Agarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5979/2013 & CM No.13168/2013 (Stay) 23rd March, 2015 % GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.Rajappa, Advocate. versus SH. KAMAL KANT AGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Abinash K.Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner/University impugns the order dated 09.04.2013 passed by the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, New Delhi (vested with power of Civil Court under the Persons with Disability (Equal Opportunity, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995) whereby, the Commissioner has effectively passed a judgment and issued directions for giving benefits to the respondent of seniority, promotion and monetary claims along with the back wages. The operative portion of the impugned order reads as under:7...
Ifci Factors Limited Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
$~26, 2, 13, 14, 41-44, 47, 48, 51, 52, 62, 70-74, 33-35, 30, 1, 23 & 38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) Date of Decision:23. d March, 2015 CRL.M.C. 700/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.2476/2012 NEERAV J.SHAH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K.Sachdeva, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + + + + + + + + + + + (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) (xii) .... Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Indrapal Singh, CAW Cell Mr. Tarun K. Bedi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CRL.M.C. 5435/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18534/2014 CRL.M.C. 5433/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18530/2014 CRL.M.C. 5437/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18538/2014 CRL.M.C. 789/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2979/2015 CRL.M.C. 790/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2982/2015 CRL.M.C. 791/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2984/2015 CRL.M.C. 792/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2986/2015 CRL.M.C. 795/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2992/2015 CRL.M.C. 796/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2994/2015 CRL.M.C. 934/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3495/2015 CRL.M.C. 935/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3497/201...
Ruchika Lalit and Ors. Vs. All India Council for Technical Education a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.2917/2015 23rd March, 2015 RUCHIKA LALIT & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose and Mr. Rishabh Jetley, Advs. versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Mr. T.Singhdev and Mr. Manan Khera, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi and Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr. Vipin Singh, Adv. for GGSIPU. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. There are a total of 25 petitioners in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The main relief which is argued for and prayed before this Court is the claim for service dues of the petitioners against the respondent no.5/College and which is run by the respondent no.3/Society.2. I have repeatedly put to the counsels for the petitioners that in one petition there cannot be innumerable number of petitio...
Kumar Apurva Vs. Valuefirst Digital Media Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI2 + ARB.A. 2/2015 KUMAR APURVA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Gaur and Mr. Adesh Kumar Sharma, Advocates. versus VALUEFIRST DIGITAL MEDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Virmani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Khalid Arshad, Mr. Mohit Chadha, Mr. Abhishek Bansal, Mr. Ishwar Upneja and Mr. Sunny Bajaj, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 23.03.2015 1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 22nd November 2014 passed by the sole Arbitrator in an application filed by the Respondent under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act).2. The backgrounds facts are that the Appellant was employed with the Respondent, a leading digital media company offeringcommunication, social interaction and content to its clients. It is stated that the Respondent provides a platform to enable its clients to interact on SMS, voice, GPRS/3G email etc. An agreement titled Emp...
Ravi Jetley Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.6601/2001 23rd March, 2015 % RAVI JETLEY ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate for Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner who was an employee of the respondent/United India Insurance Co. Ltd, seeks the relief of quashing of the recovery of incentive moneys paid to the petitioner for the years 1994-1995 and 1995-1996. The amount in question of which recovery is sought by the respondent on account of incentive moneys wrongly being paid to the petitioner is a sum of Rs. 91,560/- for the year 1995-1996 and Rs. 52,935/- for the assessment year 1998-1999. An amount of Rs. 1,09,427/- has already been deducted from the incentive...
Agence Frances Press Vs. Asst. Dirctor of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
$~40 to 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 23rd March, 2015 + + + + ITA2222015 ITA2232015 ITA2242015 ITA2252015 AGENCE FRANCES PRESS ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kaanan Kapur and Mr. Bhushan Kapur, Advs. versus ASST. DIRCTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. N P Sahni, sr. standing counsel CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % CM Nos.5382/2015, 5386/2015, 5387/2015 and 5388/2015 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. ITA Nos.222/2015, 223/2015, 224/2015 and 225/2015 1. Admit.2. Mr. N P Sahni, sr. standing counsel accepts notice.3. With the consent of the counsel the matter was finally heard.4. The question of law which arises in this case is whether the appellant was liable to pay interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the facts and circumstances of this case.5. The appellant, non-resident companies, were sought...
Ahshan Alam and Anr. Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-23-2015
$~26, 2, 13, 14, 41-44, 47, 48, 51, 52, 62, 70-74, 33-35, 30, 1, 23 & 38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) Date of Decision:23. d March, 2015 CRL.M.C. 700/2012 & Crl.M.A.No.2476/2012 NEERAV J.SHAH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K.Sachdeva, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + + + + + + + + + + + (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (xi) (xii) .... Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Indrapal Singh, CAW Cell Mr. Tarun K. Bedi, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CRL.M.C. 5435/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18534/2014 CRL.M.C. 5433/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18530/2014 CRL.M.C. 5437/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.18538/2014 CRL.M.C. 789/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2979/2015 CRL.M.C. 790/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2982/2015 CRL.M.C. 791/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2984/2015 CRL.M.C. 792/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2986/2015 CRL.M.C. 795/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2992/2015 CRL.M.C. 796/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.2994/2015 CRL.M.C. 934/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3495/2015 CRL.M.C. 935/2015 & Crl.M.A.No.3497/201...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »