Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2015 Page 7 of about 616 results (0.028 seconds)M/S Ram Chandra Krishan Chandra Vs. Atul Kapoor and Ors Though Lrs
Court: Delhi
$~2, 31, 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :26. h February , 2015 % + RFA7172010 RAM CHANDRA KRISHAN CHANDRA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. along with Mr. Nakesh Rastogi, husband of Mrs. Nisha Rastogi, Mr. Mohit Rastogi, son of Mrs. Mala Rastogi versus SANSAR CHANDRA KAPOOR DECD THR LRS ..... Respondent Through Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal, Advs. with respondent in person. 31 + RFA5062014 M/S RAM CHANDRA KRISHAN CHANDRA.... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. along with Mr. Nakesh Rastogi, husband of Mrs. Nisha Rastogi, Mr. Mohit Rastogi, son of Mrs. Mala Rastogi versus ATUL KAPOOR & ORS THROUG LRS .... Respondent Through Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal, Advs. with respondent in person.32. + RFA5072014 M/S RAM CHANDRA KRISHAN CHANDRA.... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. along with Mr. Nakesh Rastogi, husband of Mrs. Nisha Rastogi, Mr. Mohit Rastogi, son of Mrs. Mala Rastogi versus ATUL KAPOOR & ORS THOUGH LRS ..... Respondent Throug...
Tag this Judgment!Lt. Gen Amarjit Singh Bhalla (Retd.) Vs. National Sc and St Finance an ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C.No.2779/2014 & Crl.M.A.No9299/2014 LT. GEN AMARJIT SINGH BHALLA (RETD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.P.Singh, Advocate versus NATIONAL SC & ST FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT CORP. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jeemon Raju K, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of criminal complaint No.912/01/1999 and Criminal Complaint No.913/04/1999, under Section 138, 141 and 142 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is sought on merits in this petition. At the hearing, it was disclosed by learned counsel for petitioner that Notice under Section 251 of Cr.P.C. has not yet been framed. At the outset, it is made clear that learned counsel for petitioner has not been heard on merits. Since petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy available to him to urge the pleas taken herein before trial court at the time of framing of Notice under Section 251 of Cr.P.C., therefore, this ...
Tag this Judgment!Kalawati Devi and Ors. Vs. Anil Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$-11 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 730/2012 KALAWATI DEVI & ORS. Through: .... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. versus ANIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: + MAC.APP. 978/2012 BRAHM PRAKASH Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.K. Ahuja, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. Mr. R.C. Mahajan, Adv. for R-3 Mr. R.K. Sahni, Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Raheja, Adv. for R-5. .... Appellant Mr. R.K. Sahni, Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Raheja, Adv. versus KALAWATI DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv for R-1 to R-5 Mr. R.K. Ahuja, Adv. for R-6 & R-7. Mr. R.C. Mahajan, Adv. for R-8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment dated 28.04.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `39,74,135/- was granted in favour of Appellants no.1 to 5 in MAC APP.730/2012 and Respondents no.1 to 5 in MAC APP.978/2012.2. As per the case set up before the...
Tag this Judgment!Nirmala Verma Vs. Baljinder Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
$-44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 618/2006 NIRMALA VERMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.R.K. Dhawan, Advocate with Ms. Richa Dhawan, Advocate & Ms. Sheweta Joshi, Advocate versus BALJINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.L. Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Ram Ashray, Advocate for Respondent no.3 Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.5,65,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellant for the death of her son Raj Adhyaksh Verma who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 09.04.1998 at about 1:15 p.m.2. In the absence of any appeal by Respondent no.3 Insurance Company, the finding with regard to negligence has attained finality.3. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the compensation awarded is too small and inadequate. It is urged that de...
Tag this Judgment!Shakuntala Gupta Vs. The Bank of Rajasthan Limited and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :20. 02.2015 Judgment delivered on :26. 02.2015 CS(OS) 874/2011 SHAKUNTALA GUPTA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sanjiv Bahl, Mr.Udit Gupta, Mr.Kara Bharihoke and Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Adv. versus THE BANK OF RAJASTHAN LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Defendants Through Mr.R.P.Agrawal, Ms.Piyadarshini Verma and Mrs.Manisha Agrawal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking possession of the suit property i.e. a total area admeasuring 2955 sq. feet comprising of showroom on ground floor measuring 2005 sq. feet mezzanine floor measuring 750 sq feet and open space measuring 200 sq. feet on the ground floor on the rear side of the showroom and forming part of property No.82, Janpath, New Delhi. 2 It is an admitted position that the suit property had been leased out to the defendant (Bank of Rajasthan Ltd.) vide registered lease deed dated 01.10.2008 at a renta...
Tag this Judgment!Marc Evan Rothman Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~18, 19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6258/2014 PRAN MEHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta and Ms. Shreya Munoth, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Chandhiok, Ms. Shriya Misra, Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Ms. Harleen Singh and Mr. Abhimanyu, Advs. for R1. + W.P.(C) 6259/2014 MARC EVAN ROTHMAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta and Ms. Shreya Munoth, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Chandhiok, Ms. Shriya Misra, Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Ms. Harleen Singh and Mr. Abhimanyu, Advs. for R1. + W.P.(C) 6669/2014 ALBERT YUN QUAN LIU Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta and Ms. Shreya Munoth, Advs. versus COMPETITION...
Tag this Judgment!the New India Assurance Company Ltd Vs. Smt. Rukma Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:26. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP.921/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD ...... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. versus SMT. RUKMA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. for R-1 to R-9 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of `15,47,308/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents no.1 to 9 for the death of Mohan Lal, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 06.08.2011 at about 12:30 p.m. near Mangol Puri Railway Line Flyover, Mangol Puri, Delhi.2. The finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company.3. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased was working as a labourer and was earning `10,000/- per month. In the absence of any evidence with regard to deceaseds income, his income was ...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4981/2014 KRISHAN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Harish Sharma, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Satish Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.30/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Ambedkar Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 25th July, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, Delhi (Annexure-B). Notice. Mr.Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Satish Kumar on the basis of identity proof produced by her. CRL.M.C. 4981/2014 Page 1 Re...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Ram Chandra Krishan Chandra Vs. Atul Kapoor and Ors Throug Lrs
Court: Delhi
$~2, 31, 32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :26. h February , 2015 % + RFA7172010 RAM CHANDRA KRISHAN CHANDRA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. along with Mr. Nakesh Rastogi, husband of Mrs. Nisha Rastogi, Mr. Mohit Rastogi, son of Mrs. Mala Rastogi versus SANSAR CHANDRA KAPOOR DECD THR LRS ..... Respondent Through Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal, Advs. with respondent in person. 31 + RFA5062014 M/S RAM CHANDRA KRISHAN CHANDRA.... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. along with Mr. Nakesh Rastogi, husband of Mrs. Nisha Rastogi, Mr. Mohit Rastogi, son of Mrs. Mala Rastogi versus ATUL KAPOOR & ORS THROUG LRS .... Respondent Through Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Ajay Pal, Advs. with respondent in person.32. + RFA5072014 M/S RAM CHANDRA KRISHAN CHANDRA.... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. along with Mr. Nakesh Rastogi, husband of Mrs. Nisha Rastogi, Mr. Mohit Rastogi, son of Mrs. Mala Rastogi versus ATUL KAPOOR & ORS THOUGH LRS ..... Respondent Throug...
Tag this Judgment!Brahm Prakash Vs. Kalawati Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$-11 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 730/2012 KALAWATI DEVI & ORS. Through: .... Appellants Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. versus ANIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: + MAC.APP. 978/2012 BRAHM PRAKASH Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.K. Ahuja, Adv. for R-1 & R-2. Mr. R.C. Mahajan, Adv. for R-3 Mr. R.K. Sahni, Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Raheja, Adv. for R-5. .... Appellant Mr. R.K. Sahni, Adv. with Mr. Rajiv Raheja, Adv. versus KALAWATI DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv for R-1 to R-5 Mr. R.K. Ahuja, Adv. for R-6 & R-7. Mr. R.C. Mahajan, Adv. for R-8 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of a judgment dated 28.04.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `39,74,135/- was granted in favour of Appellants no.1 to 5 in MAC APP.730/2012 and Respondents no.1 to 5 in MAC APP.978/2012.2. As per the case set up before the...
Tag this Judgment!