Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 02 2015

Deluxe Dentelles Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Smt. Ishpinder Kochhar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 08, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : February 02, 2015 + RFA (OS) 55/2014 DELUXE DENTELLES PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.C.A.Sundram, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Divvya Kesaar and Mr.Mannmohit K.Puri, Advocates versus SMT. ISHPINDER KOCHHAR .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Advocate with Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti Ahuja, Advocates FAO (OS) 117/2014 DELUXE DENTELLES PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.C.A.Sundram, Sr.Advocate instructed by Ms.Divya Kesar and Mr.Manmohit K.Puri, Advocates versus SMT. ISHPINDER KOCHHAR .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Advocate with Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti Ahuja, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Appellants were the defendants and the respondent was the plaintiff before the learned Single Judge. We shall be referring to the parti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited Vs. Aseem Takyar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:02. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 3110/2011 & CM65772011 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Petitioner HATIM ALI & ANR. ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5809/2011 and CM118332011 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PRIVATE LIMITED versus ..... Petitioner ASEEM TAKYAR ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Ms Shweta Bharti. For the Respondent : Mr.Y.R. Malhotra in W.P.(C) 3110/2011. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner calls into question rulings of the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) order dated 15.04.2011 impugned in W.P.(C) No.3110/2011 and order dated 08.06.2011 impugned in W.P.(C) No.5809/2011 (hereafter impugned orders) - holding the petitioner to be a Public Authority within the meaning of section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act) and calling upon the petitio...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Kailash Chand Vs. Dtc

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 02, 2015 + LPA6582014 KAILASH CHAND Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms.Divya Aggarwal, Advocate versus DTC ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On October 16, 1984 the appellant was appointed as a Conductor with the respondent and was to be on probation for a period of one year. Deployed as a Conductor with a bus plying on Route No.402 between Jama Masjid and Okhla, the checking staff claims to have detected on February 29, 1985 that a passenger had been sold a used ticket by the appellant and he was in possession of another used ticket. Empowered under Regulation 9(a)(I) of the DRTA (Conditions of Appointment and Service) Regulations, 1952, since the appellant was still under probation his services were terminated on August 23, 1985 by an order which is exfaci...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Private Limited Vs. Hatim Ali and Anr ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Jitendra Nath Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: February 02, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6123/2013 JITENDRA NATH SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Karan Johri, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.13491/2013 Allowed. W.P.(C) 6123/2013 1. Exercising power under Section 11(2) of the BSF Act, 1968 read with Rule 122 and Rule 177 of the BSF Rules, 1969, the petitioner has been dismissed from service vide order dated February 26, 2004.2. Relevant facts would be that the petitioner was posted at the Sector Headquarters of BSF in Guwahati. He was transferred to the 137th Bn. stationed at Mawapat in Shillong. He was relieved by the Sector Headquarters in Guwahati on March 04, 2003 (AM). Granted admissible joining time, the petitioner was to report to the Commandant 137th Bn. BSF in the afternoon of Mar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Pramod Kumar Vs. R C Jain and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

$~3 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:2. d February, 2015 + + + + CONT.CAS(C) 268/2014 CONT.CAS(C) 270/2014 CONT.CAS(C) 271/2014 & CM Nos. 12161/2014 CONT.CAS(C) 275/2014 & CM Nos. 12303/2014 PRAMOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner/Contemnor in CONT. CAS (C) No.268/2014 CHANDRA PRAKASH ..... Petitioner/Contemnor in CONT. CAS (C) No.270/2014 SHASHI BHUSHAN PANDEY ..... Petitioner/Contemnor in CONT. CAS (C) No.271/2014 VED PRAKASH SINGH ..... Petitioner/Contemnor in CONT. CAS (C) No.275/2014 Represented by: Mr.V.N.Jha, Advocate. Versus R C JAIN & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divakar Prasad, Advocate Mr. Pankaj Jain in person for R-1,2&3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide these petitions, the petitioner seek to initiate contempt proceedings under section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violation of order dated 18.11.2013 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.3869/1999 and WP(C...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Chandra Prakash Vs. R C Jain and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015

Rajesh Kumar Giri and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-02-2015

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 02, 2015 + W.P.(C) 4959/2014 RAJESH KUMAR GIRI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Rekha Palli, Mrs.Punam Singh and Ms.Garima Sachdeva, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Piyush Gaur, Ms.Apurva Verma, Ms.Gunjan Bansal and Mr.Rishi Kapoor, Advs. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J (ORAL) 1. Recruitments to Group A and Group B posts in the Air Wing of the Border Security Force were as per the BSF Air Wing Officers (Group A and Group B posts) Recruitment Rules, 1999.2. Concerning the posts of : (i) Chief Engineer/DIG, (ii) Deputy Chief Engineer/Commandant, & (iii) Senior Aircraft Maintenance/2-I/C, the eligibility criteria for promotion was : (a) Chief Engineer/DIG : Deputy Chief Engineer in the pay scale of `14300-18300 with five years regular service in the grade and poss...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2015