Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2015 Page 6 of about 616 results (0.022 seconds)Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Geeta Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1027/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate versus GEETA DEVI & ORS Through: .... Respondents Mr. M.K. Sharma, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11.07.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.8,76,990/- was awarded for the death of Surender @ Shalender Prasad who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 30.12.2008.2. On appreciation of evidence, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of truck bearing no.HR-63-A-3294 driven by Respondent no.8 Rakesh Kumar. In the absence of any evidence with regard to the deceaseds income, the Claims Tribunal took minimum wages of a matriculate...
Tag this Judgment!Ravi Kumar @ Mangoo Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h February, 2015 + CRL.A. 683/2012 & Crl. MB99772014, Crl. MA183002014,Crl.MA76132014, Crl. MA55262014 and Crl. MB1542014 RAVI KUMAR @ MANGOO Through: ..... Appellant Mr Saurabh Kansal and Ms Pallavi S. Kansal, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State alongwith SI Vivek Malik Police Station Vasant Kunj, North % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgement and order on sentence dated 3rd April 2012 and 19th April 2012 whereby the appellant was convicted for offence under Section 304(I) Indian Penal Code 1860((hereinafter referred to as IPC) and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs 25,000 and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months. The fine so recovered was directed to be paid to the victim PW7 as compensation. Ben...
Tag this Judgment!Pawan Gupta Vs. Bhupinder Gupta
Court: Delhi
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.89/2015 & C.M. No.3611/2015 Decided on :27. h February, 2015 PAWAN GUPTA Through: Appellant Mr. Varun Kumar & Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocates. Versus BHUPINDER GUPTA Through: Respondent Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Mr. Rahul Mangla & Mr. Abhishek Goyal, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 30.1.2015 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (North) in R.C.A. No.80/2014 titled Pawan Gupta vs. Bhupinder Gupta by virtue of which the judgment and decree passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge on 22.11.2014 has been upheld against the present appellant.2. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the judgment which has been passed by the trial court is erroneous and has not taken into consideration the fact that there were two tenancies in respect of two shops on a monthly rent of Rs.2,500/-. The appellant during ...
Tag this Judgment!General Trading Corporation and Anr Vs. M/S Vijay Construction and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3183/2011 GENERAL TRADING CORPORATION & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: None versus M/S VIJAY CONSTRUCTION & ANR Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % 1. ..... Defendants ORDER2602.2015 The suit has been placed before the Court by the Joint Registrar, who has recorded in the order dated 10.02.2015 that the plaintiffs have not taken steps to effectively prosecute the present suit.2. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that the defendants have not been served with the summons in the suit and the plaintiffs were granted repeated opportunities to file an application for substituted service on the defendants, but to no avail. Pertinently, the plaintiffs had not appeared before the Joint Registrar on the last date of hearing. Same is the position today.3. It appears that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. FEBRUARY26 2015 r...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Suda and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:26. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP.574/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD...... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. with Mr. C.K.Gola, Adv. versus SUDA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Pankaj Kumar Deval, Adv. with Mr. Ashish Kumar, Adv. & Ms. Anjana Sirohi, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The appeal is for reduction of compensation of `16,01,680/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents no.1 to 3 for the death of Balendra, who suffered fatal injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 21.05.2013.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal found that the accident was caused on account of rash and negligent driving of the motorcycle bearing registration no.UP50W-7145 by its driver-cum-owner Abhijeet Singh (Respondent no.4 herein). It was claimed that the deceased was running a shop a...
Tag this Judgment!the New India Assurane Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt Arti Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$-19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 451/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus SMT ARTI DEVI & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14.02.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.15,41,610/- was awarded in favour of Respondents no.1 to 6 for the death of Rattan Mandal who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 05.09.2012.2. There is twin challenge to the judgment. First, negligence on the part of the driver of the insured truck bearing no.HR-55E4131 was not established which was sine qua non for the grant of compensation. Second, the compensation awarded is excessive, addition of 50% should not have been made as there was no evidence of b...
Tag this Judgment!Pran Mehra Vs. Competition Commission of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~18, 19 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6258/2014 PRAN MEHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta and Ms. Shreya Munoth, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Chandhiok, Ms. Shriya Misra, Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Ms. Harleen Singh and Mr. Abhimanyu, Advs. for R1. + W.P.(C) 6259/2014 MARC EVAN ROTHMAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta and Ms. Shreya Munoth, Advs. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Chandhiok, Ms. Shriya Misra, Mr. Bharat Aggarwal, Ms. Harleen Singh and Mr. Abhimanyu, Advs. for R1. + W.P.(C) 6669/2014 ALBERT YUN QUAN LIU Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta and Ms. Shreya Munoth, Advs. versus COMPETITION...
Tag this Judgment!Sharanjit Singh and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 3481/2013 & Crl.M.A.12751/2013 SHARANJIT SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni and Mr. Shubham Jaiswal, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Manohar Lal Mr.Neeraj Choudhary, Advocate with Dr. Submeet Kaur, Power of Attorney holder of respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.641/2003, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Rajouri Garden, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 24th October, 2014 arrived at between the parties at Vienna. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL.M.C. 3481/2013 Page 1 respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Neeraj Choudhary, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosec...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :3. d FEBRUARY, 2015 DECIDED ON :26. h FEBRUARY, 2015 + CRL.A. 1307/2011 ASHOK ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K.Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against a judgment dated 07.04.2010 in Sessions Case No.81/09 arising out of FIR No.247/09 PS Palam Village by which the appellant Ashok was held guilt for committing offence under Section 376 IPC. By an order dated 12.04.2010, he was awarded RI for ten years with fine ` 10,000/-.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as reflected in the charge- sheet was that on 24.07.2009 at about 02.15 P.M. at House No.RZD1A/145, Gali No.5, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi, the appellant sexually assaulted X (assumed name), a minor child, aged about 12 years. Police machinery came into motion when information about the incident was recorded vide Daily Dia...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 26, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 1895/2014 VED PRAKASH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Jhamb, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .... Respondents Mr.Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Renu PS Sarai Rohilla Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.32/2013 under Sections 498-A/406 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 4th June, 2013 (Annexure-B), arrived at Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Notice. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2-Kavita, present in Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by WSI Renu on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No.1895/2014 Page 1 Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute ...
Tag this Judgment!