Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamla Devi Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d February, 2015 % + LPA552015 KAMLA DEVI Through: .... Appellant Mr. Mukesh M. Goel, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R-2 to 4. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 20 th November, 2014 of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5605/2012 filed by the appellant (inter alia claiming compensation for the death of her son) on the ground of the same entailing disputed questions of fact and, giving liberty to the appellant to take appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.2. We have perused the appeal paper book and have heard the counsel for the appellant.3. The counsel for the appellant has argued that merely because some facts were disputed, was no ground for the learned Single Judge to dismiss the writ petition and the learned Single Judge ought to have at lea...
Rishi Singh and Anr. Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 03, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 409/2015 RISHI SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Mohan Singh Sodhi, Advocate versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with SI Rajvir Singh Mr. Rajveer Sirohi, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.111/2012, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Crime Against Women Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of settlement reached between the parties. Terms of settlement are recorded in the order of 7th March, 2014 of the learned matrimonial court. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Rajveer Sirohi, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in...
Ankit Gupta and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 03, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 406/2015 & Crl. M.A.No1608/2015 ANKIT GUPTA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with WSI Sarojini Mr. Girish C. Jha, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.256/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC & Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at police station North Rohini, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 16th June, 2014 reached between the parties. Notice. Mr.Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Girish C. Jha, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, p...
Commissioner of Income Tax-Iv Vs. Hero Honda Motors Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 694/2011, 696/2011, 698/2011, 699/2011, 625/2012 & 633/2012 Reserved on :10. h November, 2014 Date of decision:3. d February, 2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV Through ..... Appellant Mr. Rohit Madan, Mr. P. Roy Chaudhury & Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocates. versus HERO HONDA MOTORS LIMITED .....Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha & Mr. Vivek Bansal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.: This common decision/judgment would dispose of the present set of appeals filed by the Revenue relating to Assessment Years 2000-01, 200102 and 2002-03. These appeals impugned the order dated 16th April, 2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short). The substantial question of law required to be decided and admitted for hearing by order dated 20th April, 2012 reads as under:Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ...
Harish Kumar and Anr. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 03, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 407/2015 HARISH KUMAR & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.K. Bali, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Yogesh Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.99/2006, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC read with Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at police station Bhajanpura, Delhi is sought in this petition. Terms of settlement are recorded in the order of 20th August, 2014 of the learned matrimonial court. Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Yogesh Kumar, Investigating Officer of this case. Crl.M...
Akbar Hussain Vs. Jai Dev Vashisth
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.8/2015 & C.M. No.413/2015 Decided on :3. d February, 2015 AKBAR HUSSAIN Through: Appellant Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain & Mr. Swetab Kumar, Advocates. Versus JAI DEV VASHISTH Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 3.11.2014 passed by the learned Additional District Judge.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the judgment of the first appellant court suffers from perversity inasmuch as the evidence has not been correctly appreciated to arrive at a correct finding that the appellant is a tenant in respect of the suit property and consequently, it has fallen into grave error by passing a decree for permanent injunction as well as mandatory injunction against the present appellant in the appeal.3. Before dealing with the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, it may be pertinent her...
Defence Public School Vs. N.C.T Government of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.4549/2008 Decided on :3. d February, 2015 DEFENCE PUBLIC SCHOOL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pravin H. Parekh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. Shashank Kumar and Mr. Anurag Tripathi, Advocates. versus N.C.T GOVERNMENT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs: a) Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction etc. directing the respondents not to demolish the school building in question situated at the Defence Enclave Colony, Mahipalpur Extension, New Delhi without following the due process of law and without taking any final decision on the issue of the regularization of the structures in the colony in question namely the Defence Enclave, Mahipalpur Extension in temrs of the order of this Honble Court dated 05.10.2005 in Writ Petition No.4134- 229 of ...
Rakesh Khatri and Ors. Vs. The State (Gnct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 03, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 401/2015 & Crl. M.A.No.1588/2015 RAKESH KHATRI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Lohit Ganguly, Advocate versus % THE STATE ( GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Parvin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Sonu Kumar Mr. Rahul Ranjan Verma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.280/2011, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 18th September, 2014 (Annexure-P-2) reached between the parties. Notice. Mr. Parvin Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Rahul Ranjan Verma , Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, presen...
Subhash Chand Jain and Ors. Vs. Rukmani Devi Jain and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.A. 34/2014 SUBHASH CHAND JAIN & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate. versus RUKMANI DEVI JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0302.2015 1. The challenge in this appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) is to an Order dated 30th September 2014 passed by the learned Arbitrator in the disputes between the parties.2. The background to the present appeal is that a Civil Suit No.178 of 1997 was filed by Smt. Shanti Devi Jain, wife of late Shri Bashesher Nath Jain, Shri Subhash Chand Jain (Appellant No.1), Smt. Kanak Lata Jain (Appellant No.2), Shri Anil Kumar Jain (Appellant No.3), Shri Sunil Kumar Jain (Appellant No.4) and Shri Subhash Chand Jain (HUF) of which Appellant No.1 is the karta. The Defendants in the suit were Smt. Mohini Devi w/o late Shri Sukhbir Chand Jain, Shashi Kumar Jain ...
Hcl Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 93/2002 & 120/2008 Reserved on:3. d December, 2014 Date of Decision:3. d February, 2015 % HCL LIMITED Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha & Mr. Vivek Bansal, Advocates. Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI .. Respondent Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.: HCL Infosystems Limited, formerly known as HCL Limited, a representative assessee of Apollo Domain Computers, GmbH Germany, has filed these two appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) pertaining to Assessment Years 1989-90 and 1990-91.2. By order dated 9th October, 2002, ITA No.93/2002 was admitted for hearing on the following substantial question of law:Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the lump sum payment of Rs. 1,11,38,650/- to the assessee, by M/s Apollo Domain C...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »