Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dipak Bhattacharyya Vs. The Banking Ombudsman and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7113/2013 DIPAK BHATTACHARYYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate versus % THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.S. Parihar, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Dhruv Wahi and Mr. Ashish Sindhu, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER0402.2015 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, to assail the order dated 19.09.2012, passed by the Banking Ombudsman. 1.1 The short issue involved in the present petition is : whether the petitioner can continue to maintain its account with respondent no.3/bank, at its branch located at Barakhamba Road, New Delhi, without fulfilling the Know Your Customer (KYC) norms in the manner desired by the said respondent.2. The petitioner says that he has been maintaining the account with the respondent no.3/bank since 2001, and that, he has been denied access to the account maintained with it, for reasons, which are not susta...
Bira Thoibi and Anr Vs. State (the Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:4. h February, 2015 % + CRL.M.C. 427/2015 BIRA THOIBI & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr.K.K.Manan, Adv. with Mr.Nipun Bhardwaj & Mr.Ankush Narang, Advs. versus STATE (THE NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.M.P.Singh, APP for the State along with SI Arun Kumar, PS F.P. Beri, in person. Respondent No.2 in person along with her mother. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.1680/2015 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. Crl. M.C. No.427/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.1681/2015 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.388/2013, under Sections 370(4) (7)/ 323/307/344 IPC read with Section 23/26 of Juvenile Justice Act, Section 14 of Child Labour Act and Section 3/16 of Bonded Labour Act, registered at P.S. Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi, on the complaint of respondent No.2.2...
Robin Bartholomew and Anr Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:4. h February, 2015 % + Crl. M.C. No.364/2015 & Crl. M.A. No.1430/2015 ROBIN BARTHOLOMEW & ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Soumya Dutta, Adv. with Mr.A.K.Pandey & Mr.Shiv Shankar Banerji, Advs. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 3rd December, 2014 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Revision No.28/14.2. Brief facts of the case are that DBS Bank (respondent No.2 herein) had filed a complaint case against the petitioners alleging that petitioners are the authorized signatories being Managing Director and Director of M/s Crew B.O.S. Products Ltd and they are beneficiary of multiline credit facilities sanctioned by the complainant/ respondent No.2-Bank comprising of ...
John Nagar Vs. Dr. Hans Nagar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :29. 01.2015. Judgment delivered on :04. 02.2015 CS(OS) 666/2008 JOHN NAGAR Through ..... Plaintiff Plaintiff with his counsel Mr. Ujjwal Jha, Adv. versus DR. HANS NAGAR & ORS. Through ..... Defendants Defendant No.1 with his counsel Mr. Kishore M. Gajaria and Mr.Piyush Sachdeva, Advs. Defendant No.2 with his counsel Mr. Rajeev Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.IA No.2530/2014 (under Section 24 of the CPC by defendant No.1) 1 This is an application filed by defendant No.1 Hans Nagar for transfer of the present proceedings to the Revenue Authorities for the purpose of demarcation/physical division of the lands which are the subject matter of the present proceedings i.e. of the Nagar Estate of Ghadaipur, Mehrauli. This application has been filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC). Learned counsel for the applicant has placed relian...
Bheem Singh and Ors Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
$-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: February 04, 2015 + W.P.(C) 1335/2011 BHEEM SINGH AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. R.P. Vats, Advocate. versus ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Vipin Jai, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA % 1. This appeal challenges an order passed by Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the DRAT) on 02.11.2010 dismissing appeal No.144/2007 preferred by the petitioners against the order dated 01.06.2006 of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the DRT) allowing original application (OA) No.323/1996 thereby issuing recovery certificate.2. In view of the directions that we proceed to issue, only certain basic facts need to be captured.3. The OA was filed by respondent No.1 Bank (Oriental Bank of Commerce) on 15.03.1996 impleading the petitioners as defendant Nos. 3 to 6. The p...
Sarita Aggarwal Vs. The Income Tax officer
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.133/2003 Reserved on:5. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:4. h February, 2015 % Sarita Aggarwal ....Appellant Through Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Raja, Advocate. Versus The Income Tax Officer Respondent Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Akash Vajpai and Ruchir Bhatia Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.This appeal by Sarita Aggarwal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), pertains to assessment year 1994-95. In the return of income for the said year filed on 11th January, 1995, the assessee (Sarita Aggarwal) had shown credit of Rs.2,60,000/- in the capital account under the narration Gift. The Assessing Officer disbelieved the claim and made an addition of the aforesaid amount to the income as declared, holding that the assessee was unable to establish genuineness of the gift. However, the assessee succeed...
Jhang Biradari Housing Residents Society Vs. Bharat Bhushan Sachdeva a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:4. h February, 2015 % + I.A. No.16791/2011 & I.A. No.13043/2011 in CS(OS) 1449/2011 JHANG BIRADARI HOUSING RESIDENTS SOCIETY ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. with Mr.P.Choudhry, Adv. versus BHARAT BHUSHAN SACHDEVA & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.B.K.Sood, Adv. for defendants. Mr.Man Mohan Gupta, Adv. for applicant in I.A. No.13844/2014. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking a declaration that the plaintiff society is the actual and lawful owner of the property measuring 31 bighas comprised in Khasra Nos. 206/2, 208/2, 209, 210/2 and 211/2, Basai Dara Pur, Rothak Road, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property") with consequential relief of mandatory injunction seeking a direction for the defendants to transfer/convey the suit property in the name of th...
Preeti Chandra Vs. M/S Kautan Kraft and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :15. 10.2014 Date of decision:04.02.2015 + CM(M) 840/2014 and CM No.16276/2014 & 15110/2014 PREETI CHANDRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Shivinder Chopra, Mr.Pushpendra Singh and Mr.Uday Joshi, Advocates versus M/S KAUTAN KRAFT & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manish Mukhija, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present petition is filed seeking to impugn the order dated 8.9.2014. The brief facts leading to the present petition are that respondent No.1/Ms.Kautan Kraft filed a suit against respondent No.2/M/s.Ikon Clothing INC and other entities for recovery of Rs.10,72,071/-. The suit was decreed on 6.10.2008 in favour of respondent No.1 for a sum of USD1878192 and against respondent No.2. Respondent No.1 filed the present Execution Petition.2. Petitioner is said to be a director of respondent No.2/Judgment Debtor (JD). O...
M/S Rare Earth Overseas Vs. Container Corporation of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d February, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2957/2012 M/S RARE EARTH OVERSEAS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shahid Ali, Adv. Versus CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Respondent Through: Mr. Abhas Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The petitioner filed this petition seeking the reliefs of, (i) quashing / setting aside of the policy formulated and adopted unilaterally by the sole respondent for determining the compensation claims for losses / damages caused to consignments deposited with the respondent; and, (ii) for a direction to the respondent to compensate the petitioner equivalent to the loss suffered by the petitioner on account of destruction of the goods of the petitioner in the incident of fire at the Inland Container Depot (ICD), Tughlakabad, New Delhi on 10th April, 2010, pleading: (i) that the Govt. of India, to facilitate the export from places like Delhi wh...
Shashi Bala Vs. Sbm Sr. Secondary School and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-03-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d February, 2015 + LPA No.706/2014 SHASHI BALA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advs. Versus SBM SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sanjoy Ghosh & Mohd. Farookh, Advs. for R-1. Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for R5&6. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 26th August, 2014 of the learned Single Judge, of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5299/2014 preferred by the appellant and thereby, though refusing to quash the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the appellant but with liberty to the appellant to persuade the Inquiry Committee constituted, to stay the inquiry proceedings till the complaint filed by the appellant with respect to the same incident before the Criminal Court, is decided and with further liberty to the appellant to challenge the report of the inquiry, if any...
- ‹ Prev
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Next ›
- Last »