Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vipin Singh and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 430/2015 VIPIN SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with SI Jagdish Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.186/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Dwarka, Delhi is sought on the ground that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably resolved between the parties. Terms of settlement are mentioned in the order of 25th April, 2014. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Jagdish, Investigating Officer of Crl. M.C.No.43...
Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii Vs. Shri Shyam Sunder Infrastructure (P ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 4th February, 2015 + ITA2362014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Suruchi Aggarwal and Mr.Aamir Aziz, Advs. versus SHRI SHYAM SUNDER INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD ..... Respondent Through: Appearance not given. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) order dated 22.11.2013 allowing the assessees appeal - ITA206Del./2013 - has been questioned by the Revenue in the present appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The brief facts necessary for deciding this case are that the respondents assessment was reopened by notice under Section 147 of the Act. It is stated that the original assessee, which had filed the returns on 30.05.2003 was one Shalom Exim Pvt. Ltd. which was incorporated on 27.02.2003. Its name was subsequently changed to Mamram...
Smt Jyoti Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4073/2013 SMT JYOTI ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Anupriya Yadav, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Raj Kumar Ms. Priya Hingorani and Mr. S. Choudhary, Advocates for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In this petition, cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted to respondent-accused in FIR No.159/2013 under Section 406/498A/34 IPC registered at Police Station Krishna Nagar is sought on the ground that petitioner was subjected to cruelty and merely because respondentaccused had agreed to pay a sum of `2 lakhs to petitioner-complainant, pre-arrest bail has been granted which is unjustified in the facts and circumstances of this case. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this court to the various SMS messages sent by respondentCrl.M.C.No.4073/2...
Raghuvinder Singh and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 421/2015 & Crl.M.A. 1668/2015 RAGHUVINDER SINGH &ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Yashvinder Malik and Mr. Vincent Lakra, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with ASI Nihal Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.146/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Chhawala, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention in the affidavit of respondent No.2. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by ASI Nihal Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2,...
Ravi Singh Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 415/2015 RAVI SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Harendra Singh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.172/2010, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at police station Sadar Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of mediated settlement of 26th August, 2011and the fact that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are living together happily since 27th August, 2011. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Harender Singh, Investigating Officer Crl.M.C.No.4...
Bharov Singh Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 371/2015 & Crl.M.As.1475-76/2015 BHAROV SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Lohitaksha Shukla, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Neeraj Mr. Chetan Kakkar, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.194/2012, under Section 135 of The Electricity Act, 2003 registered at police station Vasant Kunj, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of No Dues Certificate (Annexure P-6) issued by respondent No.2-complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState accepts notice. Mr.Chetan Kakkar, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No.2 and submits that the subject matter of this FIR stands amicably CRL.M.C. 371/2015 Page 1 resolved between the parties...
Kapil Chawla Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 431/2015 & Crl.M.A. 1686/2015 KAPIL CHAWLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajinde Gulati, Advocate versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with WSI Anita Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.236/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Paschim Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement whose terms find mention in the joint statement of the parties made before trial court on 4th August, 2014 and the fact that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are living together happily for the last eight months. Notice. Mr. Vinod Diwakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and...
M/S Soni Impex Vs. M/S Taurain Overseas and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
$~10. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:04. 02.2015 Crl.L.P. No.52/2015 M/S SONI IMPEX Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amarjeet Rai, Advocate versus M/S TAURAIN OVERSEAS & ANR Through: ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) CRL MA16392015 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL MA16402015 & CRL.L.P. 52/2015 2. The present leave petition has been preferred with 20 days delay. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Since I am not inclined to issue notice on the leave petition, there would be no purpose served in issuing notice on the application seeking condonation of delay.3. The petitioner/complainant assails the judgment rendered by Sh. Naresh Kumar Malhotra, ASJ-05, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in CA no.28/2014 and Old No.48/2013 titled M/s Taurian Overseass v. M/s Soni Impex, whereby the said appeal preferred by the respondent/accused has been allowed...
Satya Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 493/2014 SATYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0402.2015 1. This is a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (Act) seeking the appointment of a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. The background of the present petition is that on 21 st June 2010 an agreement was entered into between the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondent, South Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi (SDMC) with the Petitioner whereby permission was granted to the Petitioner for putting up signage of the size of 25x 12 with total display area of 300 sq. ft at B1, Greater Kailash Enclave, Part-2. Clause 5 of the agreement inter alia reads as under:The second party shall ensure compliance of the relevant provisions of the DMC ...
Hukum Singh and Anr. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:4. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A. 486/2001 HUKUM SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kr. Verma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.6941/2014 (for restoration of the appeal) and Crl. M.A. No.13384/2014 (for directions, by appellants) 1. The present appeal has been filed by two appellants namely, Hukum Singh and Mukesh under Section 374 (2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for setting aside the impugned judgment and order dated 19th May, 2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.24/2000.2. I have been informed that Mukesh has died during the pendency of the appeal and the appeal against him is abated on 4th August, 2010. Hukum Singh is serving his sentence for ten years of imprisonment and at p...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »