Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Board of Control for Cricket in India and Another Vs. Prasar Bharati, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.1327/2007 % Judgment delivered on:04. 02.2015 BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA & ANOTHER Appellants Versus PRASAR BHARATI BROADCASTING CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Respondents WITH WP(C) No.8458/2007 BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA AND ANOTHER Petitioners versus PRASAR BHARATI, BROADCASTING CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER Respondents AND WP(C) 9610/2007 RAVI DEV GUPTA Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS LPA132707 & WPC Nos. 8458/07 & 9610/07 Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Appellant/Petitioner/BCCI : Mr Amit Sibal with Ms Radha Rangaswamy, Mr Prateek Chadha, Mr Amrinder Singh and Mr Raman Kumar For the Appellant/ESPN & Star : Mr Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal and Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Senior Advocates with Mr Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr Gopal Jain, Mr Siddharth Chopra, Ms Sneha Jain and Ms Savni Dutt For the Respondent/Prasar Bharati : Mr Paras Kuhad, ASG with Mr Rajeeve Sharma, Mr Jitin Chaturvedi, Mr ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-Xiii Vs. Chander Prakash Pabreja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 4th February, 2015 + ITA3832013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-XIII .... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jr.Standing counsel. versus CHANDER PRAKASH PABREJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K.Sabharwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M.No.12111/2013 (delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 42 days in refiling the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. ITA3832013 1. The substantial question of law sought to be urged by the Revenue is: Whether in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was correct in holding that the addition of 47,37,120/- brought to tax by the Assessing Officer (AO) was unwarranted.2. The assessee during the relevant Assessment Year (AY) 2005-06 ITA3832013 Page | 1 claimed benefit of Section 44AF of Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred as the Ac...
Gautam Khaitan and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :22. 01.2015 Judgment delivered on:04. 02.2015 % + W.P.(C) 8970/2014 GAUTAM KHAITAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ramesh Singh, Mr. A.T. Patra, Mr. N.K. Malhotra, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Ashish Goel, Mr. Nipan Malhotra and Mr. Sagar Suri, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr. Akash Nagar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J W.P.(C) 8970/2014 & CM No.20512/2014 (stay) & 20885/2014 (stay) 1. The petitioners have invoked, Article 226 of the Constitution, to assail order No.10/2014, dated 15.11.2014, passed by Shri Vikas Singh, Deputy Director in the Directorate of Enforcement (DOE). This order has been passed under Section 5(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short the PMLA) to prov...
Gulshan Rai Monga Vs. Sanjay Malhotra and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 399/2014 & CM No.20460/2014 (Stay) Reserved on:7. h January, 2015 Decided on:4. h February, 2015 % GULSHAN RAI MONGA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Jugal Wadhwa, Mr. Rishab Wadhwa and Mr. Parth Kaushik, Advs. versus SANJAY MALHOTRA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 20 th August, 2014 whereby the application of the petitioner for leave to contest the eviction petition under Clause (e) of Section 14(1) of DRC Act, 1958 filed by the respondents was dismissed.2. Respondent No.1 is the son of late Baldev Raj Malhotra and respondents No.2 to 6 the legal heirs of late Rajesh Malhotra son of late Baldev Raj Malhotra being the wife and four children. The petitioner is a tenant in one shop in property bearing No.HS-23, Kailash Colony Market, New Delhi owned by Baldev Raj Malhotra on whose demise the same devolved on his le...
Nand Kishore Saini (Since Deceased) Through One of Vs. Gaj Raj Singh a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 381/2013 & CM165242013 (stay) Reserved on:27. h January, 2015 Decided on:4. h February, 2015 % NAND KISHORE SAINI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH ONE OF HIS LRS KESHAV SAINI ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Pradeep Diwan, Mr. Ujjwal Jha, Advs. versus GAJ RAJ SINGH & ORS Through ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Kartikeya Bhargava, Advs. for R-1. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 16 th July, 2013 whereby his leave to defend application in an eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 by the respondent was dismissed and eviction order was passed.2. In the eviction petition, the respondent stated that he was residing with his family comprising of his two sons aged 21 years and 15 years respectively, two daughters and wife, the eldest daughter being married and the second daughter and son being of marriageable age, at 1883, Ram Mandir Ma...
Pawan Singh Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Criminal Appeal 929/2011 Reserved on:9. h January, 2015 Date of Decision:4. h February, 2015 % Pawan Singh ....Appellant Through Mr. Ranbir Singh Kundu and Mr. Rajeev Sirohi, Advocates. Versus Respondents State & Ors. Through Ms. Aasha Tiwari, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.Pawan stands convicted for murder of his wife Dimple, in the intervening night between 17th and 18th September, 2009 at her matrimonial home at A-478/11, Gali No.11, Mandoli Extn., Delhi. The impugned judgment dated 28th May, 2011, arises out of FIR No.66/2010, P.S. Harsh Vihar registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). By the order on sentence dated 6th June, 2011, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.7,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. The appellant challenges his conviction, inter alia...
Lal Chand Vs. Maya Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 101/2011 & CMs. 13378/2011, 22349/2011 Decided on:4. h February, 2015 % LAL CHAND Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary, Adv. versus MAYA DEVI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Praveen Kr. Singh, Navlendu Kumar, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impunges the order dated 2nd November, 2010 whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner in an eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) was dismissed.2. Possession of the tenanted premises has already been handed over to the respondent in execution petition, however vide order dated 26 th September, 2013 this Court directed that the respondent shall not sub-let or create any third party interest in the suit property.3. In the eviction petition the respondent stated that the suit property i.e. 11841, Gali No.8, Sat Nagar, Karol Bagh, Delh...
Smt. Vasantha Rajagopalan Vs. Govt. of Nct, Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.808/2014 4th February, 2015 % SMT. VASANTHA RAJAGOPALAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S., Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was appointed as the Principal of the respondent no.5/school i.e DTEA Senior Secondary School, seeks the monetary emoluments of a Principal during the period of employment as Principal of the school from 20.3.2007 till 5.8.2008.2. The case as set up in the writ petition is that the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) constituted by the respondent no.5/school on 19.3.2007 recommended the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Principal of the respondent no.5/school and therefore petitioner wa...
Brijesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Shikha Gupta and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 133/2013 & Crl. M.A.No.502/2013 BRIJESH KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Malini & Ms. Naina Dubey, Advocates with petitioner in person versus SHIKHA GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Maninder Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2-State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Impugned order of 18th December, 2012 entertained petitioners appeal under Section 29 of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 subject to deposit of arrears of maintenance, as granted by the trial court while permitting petitioner to deduct the amount of `92,000/- from the amount due. Appellate Court vide impugned order has directed the petitioner to convert the arrears of maintenance into two Crl.M.C.No.133/2013 Page 1 fixed deposit receipts of equal amount in the name o...
Sunil Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 04, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2676/2014 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Mukesh Chauhan & Mr. S.K. Chaudhary, Advocates with petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1State with SI Gaurav Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.125/2012, under Sections 323/308/34of the IPC, registered at police station Jhangirpuri, Delhi, is sought on the basis of Settlement-Agreement of 5th April, 2014 reached through Mediation Centre, Rohini District, New Delhi and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present Crl.M.C.No.2676/2014 Page 1 in the Court, is complainant/...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »