Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Choice Hotels International Inc Vs. M Sanjay Kumar and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:9. h February, 2015 % + I.A. No.2402/2010 in CS(OS) 332/2010 CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL INC ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Abhilasha Nautiyal, Adv. with Mr.Raunaq Kamath, Adv. versus M SANJAY KUMAR AND ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.S.Santanam Swaminadhan, Adv. with Ms.Insha Mir & Ms.Shagufa Salim, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution of trademarks, damages, delivery up etc. against the defendants.2. By this order, I propose to decide the pending application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC being I.A. No.2402/2010 filed by the plaintiff.3. The plaintiff's case as per the plaint is as under: (i) The plaintiff is a hospitality holding corporation originally set up in 1939 as a non-profit association under the name Quality Courts United, and became Choice Hotels Internati...
Amit Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
$-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1096/2014 AMIT KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Anuj Jain, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC for Respondent no.1/UOI. Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate for Respondent no.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. There is twin challenge to the judgment dated 30.07.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- was awarded in favour of Respondent no.1 in respect of damage to army vehicle BA no.95D-101349-E, LY3 Ton Shaktiman which met with an accident with truck bearing no.HR-55A-1616 which was owned by Appellant Amit Kumar.2. It is urged that the damage to the extent of Rs.1,00,000/- was not proved and that the Claims Tribunal erred in holding that there was willful breach of the terms and conditions of the Insurance policy on the part of the Appell...
Commissioner of Income Tax (Tds)-I Vs. C.J. International Hotels Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
$~2, 40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:09. 02.2015 + ITA No.57/2015, ITA No.67/2015, CM No.2230/2015 ITA No.68/2015, CM No.2231/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi with Ms. Bhawna Bakshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Two questions have sought to be urged on behalf of the Revenue in the present appeals directed against the judgment of the ITAT. These are, firstly, to initiate proceedings against the assessee in default who does not deduct tax and secondly on merits the applicability of Section 2 (22) (e), in the circumstances of the case.2. Theses appeals concern the Assessment Years 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001-02. Ms. Harjit Kaur, concededly a shareholder of M/s Pure Drinks (New Delhi) Ltd. had borrowed amounts from...
Dtc Vs. Prem Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6603/2001 % Judgement reserved on:21. 01.2015 Judgement pronounced on:09. 02.2015. ..... Petitioner D.T.C. Through: Mr.Adesh Kumar, Advocate. Through: ..... Respondent Mr.G.S. Charya, Advocate. versus PREM SINGH AND W.P.(C) 4071/2004 + D.T.C. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Adesh Kumar, Advocate. versus PREM SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. G.S. Charya, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide this common judgment, I propose to dispose of W.P.(C) No.6603/2001 and W.P.(C) No.4071/2004 since in both the cases, common question of law and facts are involved.2. The brief facts in both the petitions are that the respondent-workman was in the employment of the petitioner as a driver. He was employed on 31.05.1979. On 31.12.1988, while he was on duty and driving Bus No.DEP9353 on route No.SS(-), GTB Nagar, he allegedly was driving the said bus in rash and negligent manner and carelessly and caused an accident which re...
Nilam Katara Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
State Vs. Vikas Yadav and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
Sukhdev Yadav Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
Vishal Yadav Vs. State Govt. of Up
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
State Vs. Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:06. h February, 2015 % + CRL.A.910/2008 VIKAS YADAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Adv. with Mr.Amit Kala,Adv. versus STATE OF UP Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. CRL.A.741/2008 VISHAL YADAV Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjay Jain and Mr. Vinay Arora, Advs. versus STATE GOVT. OF UP ....Respondents Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Mr.P.K. Dey, Adv. with Mr.Kaushik Dey, Mr. Abhijeet, Mr. Vijay Pal Singh and Mr. Andleeb Naqvi, Advs. for complainant. Crl.A.Nos.910, 741, 958/2008, Crl.Rev.P.No.369/2008, Crl.A.Nos.1322/2011 & 145/2012 pg. 1 + CRL.A.958/2008 STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Adv. with Ms. Shinjan Jain, Adv. for State. Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for ...
Arvind Kumar Arora Vs. The Management Mother Dairy (Now Known as Fruit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:6. h February, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8383/2014 ARVIND KUMAR ARORA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Jitin Sahni and Mr. Vikas Yadav, Advocates. Versus THE MANAGEMENT MOTHER DAIRY (NOW KNOWN AS FRUIT & VEGETABLE PVT. LTD.) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna S. Dhingra and Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks setting aside of the impugned order dated 21.08.2008 passed in ID No.216/2010 (old ID No.03/2005), whereby the learned Labour Court held that the enquiry was fair and proper being conducted after appreciating the evidence on record and giving appropriate opportunity to the petitioner.2. Also seeks to set aside the impugned order dated 07.07.2014 passed by the Labour Court to the extent for not granting back wages and continuity of service to the petitioner.3. Mr. Jitin Sahni, learned counsel appearing ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »