Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raja Bai and Anr Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h February, 2015 % + LPA132015 & CM No.565/2015 (for directions) SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH & ANR .... Appellants Through: Mr. A. Maitri with Ms. Radhika Chandrasekhar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Ms. Nishtha Sikroria, Adv. for UOI. AND + LPA432015 & CM No.1598/2015 (for stay) RAJA BAI & ANR Through: .... Appellants Mr. A. Maitri, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Akshay Makhija and Mr. Kavindra Gill, Advs. for UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. Both appeals impugn the order dated 28th November, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal in limine of W.P.(C) Nos.8264/2014 & 8272/2014 filed by the appellants respectively. LPA No.13/2015 came up first on 13th January, 2015, when the counsel for the respondent Union of India (UOI) appeared on advance notice. After hearing th...
Rajni Jain and Anr. Vs. Parag Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:27. h January, 2015 Judgment Delivered on:9. h February, 2015 % + FAO(OS) 37/2015 and CM No.1281/2015 (stay) RAJNI JAIN & ANR. ....Appellants versus PARAG JAIN ....Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants: Mr K.K Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr P.K Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondent: None. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The Appellants have filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 17.11.2014 whereby the application of the Appellants under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed. =============================================================== 2. The Respondent (Plaintiff) before the trial court filed a suit for specific performance, declaration, mandatory and permanent injunction in respect of property E-142, Preet Vihar, Delhi-92.3. It is contended by ...
Anjna Chaudhry Vs. Director General, Indo Tibetan Border Police Force
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 09, 2015 + W.P.(C) 3197/2014 ANJNA CHAUDHRY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.Rao, Advocate versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDO TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. In the months of July and August, 2012 recruitment was made in the Central Armed Police Forces to the post of Constable (GD). The empanelled candidates had to be subjected to a medical evaluation. A medical board of three officers of Indo Tibetan Border Police was constituted, one of whom was Dr.Sarabjit Singh. A candidate named Manoj Kumar who was declared medically fit revealed that he had paid a bribe of `70,000/- to secure employment. Matter was investigated and as per ITBP, the petitioner who was working as a Chief Medical Officer had tried to influence the medical board and in re...
Prem Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : February 02, 2015 Judgment Delivered on : February 09, 2015 + W.P.(C) 5811/2012 PREM KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate instructed by Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Mr.S.Sharma and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has impugned the dismissal order dated June 06, 2008 which was confirmed by Chief of Air Staff. as well the order dated May 16, 2012 by AFT, Principal Bench, New Delhi whereby OA No.227 of 2010 filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The petitioner was enrolled as Airman in Indian Air Force on July 23, 1990 and was later on promoted to the rank of Sergeant. The petitioner was issued show cause notice dated March 31, 2008 based on the complaints made by Sh.S...
a Kumar Sharma Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t November, 2014 Date of Decision:9. h February, 2015 % + CRL. M.C. 3302/2013 A KUMAR SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raaj Malhotra Advocate. versus CBI Through: .....Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl.P.P. with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By the present petition the petitioner seeks quashing of the charge sheet RC-49(A)/2003/CBI/ACB/New Delhi under Section 120B/420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) titled as CBI v. D.N. Upadhayay & Others, presently pending in the court of learned Special Judge CBI, Patiala House, New Delhi and all the proceedings pursuant therefrom.2. The brief case of the prosecution is that on 27.02.1997, M/s. Madhusudan International Pvt. Ltd. (a partnership firm then) applied for a credit facility which included Import LC DA (90 days) Rs.100 lakhs (Rupees One hundred lakhs) and cash cr...
Dr. Ms Jyotsna Sharma Vs. University of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5158/2012 9th February, 2015 DR. MS JYOTSNA SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. D.S. Mehandru, Advocate. Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.15052/2014 (restoration) & 15053/2014 (condonation of delay) 1. There is no opposition to these applications which are therefore allowed. Writ petition is restored to its original number. C.M.s stand disposed of. + W.P.(C) No.5158/2012 2. By this writ petition of the year 2012 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought quashing and setting aside of the order of the employer/respondent no.2/A.R.S.D College dated 23.1.2004 whereby the resignation of the petitioner was accepted. Petitioner states that petitioners resignation could not have been accepted inasmuch as petitioner had vide he...
Rajesh and Anr. Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. h February, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 377/2015 RAJESH & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Jai Dev Sharma, Advocates versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pravin Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with Inspr. Anil Kumar, PS Bawana. Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % ORAL Quashing of FIR No.815/2014, under Sections 308/34 of IPC registered at police station Bawana, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 22nd January, 2015 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District, Courts, Delhi (Annexure-B ). Affidavit of respondent No.2 Mr. Mukesh regarding amicable settlement between the parties has been filed on record. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be s...
Bikramjit Ahluwalia Vs. The State (Govt. of Nct) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
$-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 09, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5170/2014 & Crl.M.A.17700/2014 BIKRAMJIT AHLUWALIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Chadha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal and Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT) & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Satish Ms. Ashima Roy Chaudhary, sister of respondent No.3 in person Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate with respondent No.3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.16/2012, under Sections 420/467/468/471/ 120-B of IPC registered at police station Safdarjung Enclave, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 27th August, 2014. While entertaining this petition, petitioner was directed to join the investigation of this case. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that in terms of the order of 22 nd January, 2015, petitioner has...
Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Shabir and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
$-27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 22/2015 SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.K.L. Nandwani, Advocate versus SHABIR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is directed against judgment dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.17,93,300/- was awarded for the death of Ms. Barkatt Bano, a housewife who died in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 24.09.2012.2. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that the Claims Tribunal erred in reaching the finding of negligence and that the compensation awarded is excessive and exorbitant.3. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, Respondents examined Mohd. Shahzad (PW-2), an eye witness to the accident. He testified that the driver of the offending TATA407bearing no.UP-13F-9944 had suddenly take...
Mrs Savina Sharan Vs. M/S Babu Haleem Handicrafts
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-09-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :05.02.2015 Judgment delivered on :09.02.2015 CS(OS) 2417/2009 MRS SAVINA SHARAN Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Piyush Aggarwal, Advocate. versus M/S BABU HALEEM HANDICRAFTS Through ..... Defendant None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. Present suit is a suit for recovery. Plaintiff Savina Sharan has claimed a sum of Rs.28,79,302/- from the defendant.2. The plaintiff is stated to be a proprietary concern having business dealings with the defendant since the year 2004. Plaintiff had been supplying material to the defendant (Boll Bottle Stoppers) and on account payments were being made. Purchase orders had been placed upon the defendant on 30.4.2007, 30.5.2007; the articles were to be delivered by 30.6.2007. It was agreed between the parties that in case job work order was not complied with within the stipulated period , Re.1.00 per piece per day will be deducted from the bill amount payable by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »