Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. R. Kannan Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3876/2013 11th February, 2015 % DR. R. KANNAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Subhash Mishra, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Advocate for R-1. Mr.D.K.Nag, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was a Whole Time Member (Actuary) of the respondent no.2/Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, seeks quashing of the demand/recovery notice dated 18.2.2012 issued by the respondent no.2 for an amount of Rs.30,84,355/-. The demand/recovery notice was issued because as per the respondent no.2 the petitioner was not entitled to actuarial allowance of Rs.65,000/- per month from the date of his appointment on 18.12.2006 till it was paid for October 2010, and thus the total amount of Rs.30,84,355/- shoul...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Manorma Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP.145/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Adv. with Ms. Rhythma Kaul, Adv. versus MAMTA GUPTA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. MAC.APP.146/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Adv. with Ms. Rhythma Kaul, Adv. versus MANORMA GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CAV. 152/2015 in MAC APP.145/2015 CAV. 150/2015 in MAC APP.146/2015 There is appearance on behalf of the caveators. Both the caveats stand discharged. CM APPL.2485/2015 (exemption) in MAC.APP.145/2015 CM APPL.2513/2015 (exemption) in MAC.APP.146/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM APPL.2486/2015 (delay) in MAC.APP.145/2015 CM APPL.2514/...
Girish Babu Gupta Vs. Omkar Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 1055/2012 GIRISH BABU GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.O.P. Manni, Advocate with Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate versus OMKAR SINGH AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate with Mr. Garud M.V., Advocate for Respondent no.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL167132012(delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. MAC.APP.1055/2012 3. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.8,46,719/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) to Appellant Girish Babu Gupta who suffered grievous injuries resulting in amputation of his right leg above the knee in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 27.01.2008 at 11:00 a.m.4. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the Appellant was carrying on the business of cloth tradin...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mamta Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~40 & 41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP.145/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Adv. with Ms. Rhythma Kaul, Adv. versus MAMTA GUPTA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. MAC.APP.146/2015 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Adv. with Ms. Rhythma Kaul, Adv. versus MANORMA GUPTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CAV. 152/2015 in MAC APP.145/2015 CAV. 150/2015 in MAC APP.146/2015 There is appearance on behalf of the caveators. Both the caveats stand discharged. CM APPL.2485/2015 (exemption) in MAC.APP.145/2015 CM APPL.2513/2015 (exemption) in MAC.APP.146/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. CM APPL.2486/2015 (delay) in MAC.APP.145/2015 CM APPL.2514/...
Nisar Ahmed Vs. Agyapal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. 05.2014 Decided on:11. 02.2015 + RC.REV. 377/2011 NISAR AHMED Through ..... Petitioner Mr. S.H. Nizami, and Mr. S.S. Nizami, Advs. Versus AGYAPAL SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Duggal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act) challenges the order dated 26th May, 2011 of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC), whereby the petitioners eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25-B of the Act was dismissed on the ground that (i) the petitioner had failed to show that he was the owner of the tenanted premises; and (ii) at best he was the collector of rent being the Mutawalli of the Wakf property, therefore, he could not maintain the eviction petition.2. The respondent had filed an application for leave to defend and pending its consideration, he moved an application under Order VII, Rule 11 of...
Sudhir Chaudhry Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d December, 2014 Date of Decision:11. h February, 2015 % + CRL. M.C. 3904/2014 SUDHIR CHAUDHRY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr. Mudit Jain and Ms. Katyayini, Advocates. versus STATE Through: + .....Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Avtar, STF Crime Branch. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Goyal and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocates for complainant. CRL. M.C. 3912/2014 SAMIR AHLUWALIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr. Mudit Jain and Ms. Katyayini, Advocates. versus STATE Through: Crl. M.C. Nos.3904/2014 & 3912/2014 .....Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Avtar, STF Crime Branch. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Goyal and Mr. Mohit CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By these two petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P...
Samir Ahluwalia Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d December, 2014 Date of Decision:11. h February, 2015 % + CRL. M.C. 3904/2014 SUDHIR CHAUDHRY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr. Mudit Jain and Ms. Katyayini, Advocates. versus STATE Through: + .....Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Avtar, STF Crime Branch. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Goyal and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocates for complainant. CRL. M.C. 3912/2014 SAMIR AHLUWALIA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Mr. Mudit Jain and Ms. Katyayini, Advocates. versus STATE Through: Crl. M.C. Nos.3904/2014 & 3912/2014 .....Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State with Inspector Ram Avtar, STF Crime Branch. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Goyal and Mr. Mohit CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By these two petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P...
Vimla Devi Vs. Sunil Dua
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 158/2014 Reserved on:5. h February, 2015 Decided on:10. h February, 2015 % VIMLA DEVI Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Saurabh Chauhan and Mr. Varun Jain, Advocates versus SUNIL DUA Through ..... Respondent Mr. Rajeev Sharma and Mr. Gagan Minocha, Advocates Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the impugned judgment dated 27th August, 2013 the learned ARC has dismissed the eviction petition filed by the petitioner under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) on the ground that since the rent as per the notice dated 30.12.2008 was `3630/- P.M. the petition does not fall under the purview of the DRC Act.2. The petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from shop No.6, A Block Market, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I, Delhi (in short the tenanted premises) which were let out vide agreement dated 16th November, 2010 at a monthly rent of `3000/-. Though as per the agreement...
M/S Lion Services Ltd Vs. M/S Dlf Projects Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment deserved on February 02, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 10, 2015 + ARB.P. 132/2012 & IA27942014 M/S LION SERVICES LTD Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Seema Tiwari, Advocate versus M/S DLF PROJECTS LTD Through ..... Respondent Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Meghna Mishra, Ms.F.A. Khan and Ms.Niyati Kohli, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for appointment of an Arbitrator. Even though the petition has been filed for appointment of arbitrator with regard to eight work orders, it is the case of the petitioner during the submissions that 12 work orders have been issued to the petitioner for providing housekeeping and maintenance service to the respondent. There is no dispute between the parties on this account. It is averred in the petition that this Court has jurisdiction as parties have agreed that the Courts of Delhi would have exclusive juri...
Rajendra Kataria Vs. Baldesh Kumar Kaushik and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-10-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 307/2011 Reserved on:2. d February, 2015 Decided on:10. h February, 2015 % RAJENDRA KATARIA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Bhachawat, Mr. Manoj Joshi, Advs. versus BALDESH KUMAR KAUSHIK & ORS ..... Respondent Through Ms. Reeta Kaul, Adv. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The petitioner impugnes the order dated 8th April, 2011 whereby his application for leave to defend, the eviction petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the DRC Act) has been dismissed.2. Respondent No.1 filed an eviction petition claiming himself to be the co-owner of premises bearing No.699 Chirag Delhi measuring 500 sq. ft. along with respondent Nos. 2 to 6. The said tenanted premises was let out to the petitioner for commercial purpose for running a clinic on a monthly rent of ` 187/- excluding water and electricity charges. It was stated that the respondent No.1 re...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »