Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gaurav Rajput and Ors. Vs. State of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 524/2015 & Crl.M.A.2047/2015 GAURAV RAJPUT & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Neeraj Sood, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR Through: .....Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Asha Mr. Jaidev Sharma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.21/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station CAW Cell, Nanakpura, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 5th June, 2014 arrived at Counselling Cell (Annexure-C). Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Jaidev Sharma, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 524/2015 Page 1 Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant...
Sh. Vishwanath Chugh Vs. Sh. Krishan Lal Chugh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :04.02.2015 Judgment delivered on :11.02.2015. CS(OS) 653/2008 SH. VISHWANATH CHUGH Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Anil Kumar Narang, Adv. versus SH. KRISHAN LAL CHUGH & ORS. Through ..... Defendants Ms.Anu Narula, Adv. for D-1 & D-2. Mr. J.S.Bakshi, Mr. A.S. Bakshi and Mr. Ankush Sharma, Advs. for D-3, D-5 & D-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 Present suit has been filed by Vishwanath Chugh s/o late Sh. Gobind Ram Chugh seeking partition of a property bearing No.C-111, Kalkaji, New Delhi. The five defendants who have been arrayed in the suit were four brothers and one sister. During the course of their strife, the plaintiff had died; defendants No.1, 3 & 5 had also expired. They are all represented through their respective legal heirs. 2 Gobind Ram Chugh was allotted a property by the Rehabilitation Department which is the suit property i.e. Municipal No.C-111, Kalkaji, New Delhi. This prope...
Kamal Ghanshyamdas Bhatia and Ors. Vs. Religare Finvest Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on February 11, 2015 + O.M.P. 154/2015 KAMAL GHANSHYAMDAS BHATIA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Prashant Mendiratta, Mr.Adarsh Ramakrishnan, Advs. Versus RELIGARE FINVEST LTD Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Ajay Uppal, Adv. with Mr.Kuljeet and Mr.K.Karthikey, AR of the respondent company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition filed by the petitioners under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act in short), challenging the award dated December 5, 2014 passed by the sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition No.RFL/Mortgage/LRN/L-3/540.2. Some of the relevant facts are that, the petitioner No.1 had offered a loan of Rs. 5 Crores to the respondent. The EMI was fixed for 84 months at Rs. 8,90,142/- per month. The petitioner No.1 defaulted in making the monthly instalments. The respondent had invoked the arbitration clause and appointed an Arbitrator. The Arbitr...
Batool Dawood Vs. Additional Director, Directorate of Enforcement, G
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~2, 3, 22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgement delivered on:11. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 1055/2015 BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1063/2015 SHAHNAZ DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1311/2015 SPACE AGE POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1312/2015 MISS BILQUIS BANO ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA WP(C) Nos. 1055/2015, 1063/2015, 1311/2015 & 1312/2015 Advocates who appeared in the case: For the petitioners: Mr Ajay G. Majithia, Advocate For the respondent: Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Kirtiman Singh, Ms Pallavi Shali & Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) No.1055/2015 & CM Nos. 18...
Shahnaz Dawood Vs. Additional Director, Directorate of Enforcement, G
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~2, 3, 22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgement delivered on:11. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 1055/2015 BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1063/2015 SHAHNAZ DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1311/2015 SPACE AGE POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1312/2015 MISS BILQUIS BANO ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA WP(C) Nos. 1055/2015, 1063/2015, 1311/2015 & 1312/2015 Advocates who appeared in the case: For the petitioners: Mr Ajay G. Majithia, Advocate For the respondent: Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Kirtiman Singh, Ms Pallavi Shali & Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) No.1055/2015 & CM Nos. 18...
Suresh Chand Jain Vs. Director General and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: February 11, 2015. + W.P.(C) 5603/2013 & CM APPL. NO.12416/2013 SURESH CHAND JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Behera, Mr. Niranjan Saha & Mr. Girish Kargeti, Advocates versus DIRECTOR GENERAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pratap Shanker, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. In the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the challenge is to order dated 07.09.2011 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the CAT), whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed O.A. No.935 of 2011 preferred by the petitioner. In the said O.A., the petitioner had challenged the order dated 2.4.2009 and 8.2.2011, respectively, whereby his services were terminated during the period of probation.2. We may at the outset, set out the relevant facts before we advert to the controversy in det...
Miss Bilquis Bano Vs. Additional Director, Directorate of Enforcement, ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~2, 3, 22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgement delivered on:11. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 1055/2015 BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1063/2015 SHAHNAZ DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1311/2015 SPACE AGE POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1312/2015 MISS BILQUIS BANO ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA WP(C) Nos. 1055/2015, 1063/2015, 1311/2015 & 1312/2015 Advocates who appeared in the case: For the petitioners: Mr Ajay G. Majithia, Advocate For the respondent: Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Kirtiman Singh, Ms Pallavi Shali & Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) No.1055/2015 & CM Nos. 18...
Space Age Polymers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Additional Director, Directorate of E ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~2, 3, 22 & 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgement delivered on:11. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 1055/2015 BATOOL DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1063/2015 SHAHNAZ DAWOOD ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1311/2015 SPACE AGE POLYMERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1312/2015 MISS BILQUIS BANO ..... Petitioner versus ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA WP(C) Nos. 1055/2015, 1063/2015, 1311/2015 & 1312/2015 Advocates who appeared in the case: For the petitioners: Mr Ajay G. Majithia, Advocate For the respondent: Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Kirtiman Singh, Ms Pallavi Shali & Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) No.1055/2015 & CM Nos. 18...
Naveen Dahiya Vs. Gnct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: February 11, 2015. + W.P.(C) 2125/2014 NAVEEN DAHIYA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCTD with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for Delhi Police CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. Challenge in the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the order dated 06.02.2014 whereby the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi has dismissed the O.A. No.1063/2013 preferred by the petitioner.2. Facts essential to decide the present writ petition are that the petitioner in pursuance of an advertisement issued by the respondent Delhi Police in the year 2010, had applied for the post of Head Constable (Ministerial) under the OBC category. There were 499 vacancies in total, out of which 255 va...
State Vs. Wajid
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~03. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 31/2014 Judgment dated 11th February, 2015 % STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for the State along with Inspr. Dheeraj Singh, P.S. Mayur Vihar. versus WAJID ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 630/2014.1. This is an application filed by the State seeking condonation of 1381 days delay in filing the present appeal.2. The grounds raised in this application, more particularly paras 4, 5, 5A and 6, read as under:4. That the filing of the Leave to appeal against the impugned judgment has been delayed on account of many factors. The judgment was pronounced on 10.12.2009 and considerable time was taken in procuring the certified copy of the judgment. After procuring all the documents Public Prosecutor prepared its report recommending filing of appeal against the impugned judgment and sent the file to the Chief Public Pro...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »