Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Gcg Transglobal Housing Project Pvt Ltd Vs. Surakshit Exports Priv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~A-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. 01.2015 Pronounced on :11.02.2015 + % CS(OS) 93/2012 M/S GCG TRANSGLOBAL HOUSING PROJECT PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Manish Kumar, Adv. versus SURAKSHIT EXPORTS PRIVATE LTD & ORS ....Defendants Through Mr.T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dinesh Rastogi and Mr.Manish Ahluwalia, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH ORDER1102.2015 % JAYANT NATH, J IA No.12305/2013 (under O.6 R.17 CPC) in CS(OS) No.93/2012 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint.2. The plaint is filed seeking the following reliefs:(i) pass a decree in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants permanently injuncting the defendants, their agents, representatives, assignees acting for and on their behalf directly or indirectly interfering with or obstructing the exclusive possession of the plaintiff over the suit property described in Schedule A to the...
Centaur Hotel Employees Union Vs. Hotel Corporation of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.1166/2014 & W.P. (C) 3036/2014 11th February, 2015 % W.P.(C) No.1166/2014 CENTAUR HOTEL EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD.) AND ANR. Through: None. versus ..... Petitioners HOTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Sud, Advocate W.P.(C) No.3036/2014 HCI OFFICERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION DELHI (REGD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yasharth Kant, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Anjana Gosain, Mr. Pradeep Desodya, Advocates for respondent/UOI. Ms. Meenakshi Sud, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.1166/2014 1. No one appears for the petitioner although it is 12.45 p.m. When notice was issued in this case on 19.2.2014, the following order was passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court:1. I have put to Mr. J.P. Sengh, learned senior counsel, two judgments of the Supreme Co...
Northern Coalfields Limited Vs. D.B. Goswami and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5094/2013 11th February, 2015 % NORTHERN COALFIELDS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirudh Singh with Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Advocates. versus D.B. GOSWAMI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner/employer seeks quashing of the order dated 02.5.2013 passed by the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, and by which order the Chief Commissioner gave service benefits to the respondent no.1 along with all consequential monetary benefits by ordering as under: 24. In the light of the above the respondent is directed as under:- (i) While the provisions of Section 47, treat the complainant as if he was in service till the date he attained the age of superannuation and grant him all benefits and ensure that the money goes to his personal account. (ii) This court also obs...
Commissioner of Income Tax ???Ii Vs. M/S Micron Steels Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~1-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h February, 2015 + + + + + ITA192014 ITA212014 ITA222014 ITA232014 ITA242014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kamal Sawhney, Sr.Standing counsel with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jr.Standing counsel. versus + M/S MICRON STEELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Salil Kapoor and Mr.Vikas Jain, Advs. ITA202014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Kamal Sawhney, Sr.Standing counsel with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Jr.Standing counsel. versus M/S STEELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Salil Kapoor and Mr.Vikas Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Revenue in these appeals claims to be aggrieved by the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 19.02.2013. The ITAT had ITA Nos. 19-24/2014 Page 1 affirmed the order of CIT(Appeals) who had set aside the block assessment of M/s Micron Steels ...
N.R. Parashar Vs. Managing Committee Cambridge School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2625/2014 11th February, 2015 % N.R. PARASHAR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Indrani Ghosh, Advocate versus MANAGING COMMITTEE CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL SRINIWASPURI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zehra Khan, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 & 4. Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.4. Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocate for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner who was working as the Vice-Principal with the respondent No.1/school, and who superannuated in April 2014, seeks the relief for being considered for extension of services upto the age of 62 years in terms of Rule 110 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973. Petitioner also seeks to take benefit of Bye-Law 30.1 of CBSE affiliation Bye-Laws to argue that if the petitioner retires in the middle of the academic session then the petitioner must reti...
Amit Pal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.5743/2014 11th February, 2015 % AMIT PAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate with Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mrs. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the action of the respondents in cancelling the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Assistant GradeIII (General, Depot, technical & Accounts Cadre) in the Food Corporation of India/respondent no.3. Petitioner had participated in the selection process for the post in terms of the advertisement dated 25.8.2012 and which entitled the petitioner to be employed in the post. Petitioner appeared as an OBC candidate in...
Jay Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 11, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8080/2013 JAY PRATAP SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Prashant Sivarajan, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Monika Arora, Advocate with Mr.Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of Certiorari for quashing the order dated June 11, 2013, whereby the petitioners representation for notional pay fixation and grant of seniority in the rank of Assistant Commandant with effect from November 03, 2010 i.e. the date his juniors were promoted stood rejected; as well as for issuance of a writ of Mandamus to implement the judgment dated March 07, 2011 passed by this court in WP(C) No.1461/2011.2. The brief facts germane for adjudication of the present petition are that joining duty as Su...
Alstom India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1331/2015 ALSTOM INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sujit Ghosh, Ms. Kanupriya Bhargava and Ms. Krishna Rao, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Ms. Manisha Gupta and Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advs. for R1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER1102.2015 % CM No.2331-32/2015 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1331/2015 2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Narula, who appears on advance notice, accepts notice. 3.1 Mr Narula says that he is willing to argue the matter on the basis of the record of the case filed by the petitioner as, the broad facts, necessary for adjudication are not in dispute.4. Broadly, the case of the petitioner is that at the behest of a sub- contractor, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (in short BHEL), it supplied boiler components to National Thermal Power Corporation (in short NTPC) under International Competitive Bidding (in short the ICB).5...
Sajjan Kumar and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:11. 02.2015 + WP(C) 66/2012 SAJJAN KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr Rajesh Yadav, Ms Chandrani Prasad, Ms. Ruchika V. Arora & Ms Mitali, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr Rishi Kapoor, Ms Apurva Varma, Ms Gauraan Bhardwaj & Ms Gunjan Bansal, Advs. for R-1. Mr S.K. Dubey, Mr Rajmangal Kumar & Ms Sushma Yadav, Advocates for R- 2 to 4. Mr Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Shruti Yadav, Advocate for Resp./Customs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a writ petition in which several reliefs have been sought by the petitioners. A perusal of the record would show that vide order dated 11.05.2012 the two reliefs, which the petitioners had pressed for, and which are set out in prayer clause (b) and (e), have already been granted vide order dated 11.05.2012, passed...
Sanjeev Nanda Vs. C.B.I.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 11, 2015 + CRL.M.C.NO.531/2015 SANJEEV NANDA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr. Vivek Suri & Mr. Apporva Pandey, Advocates versus C.B.I. Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant & Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.2064/2014 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C.No.531/2015 While granting bail to petitioner, a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order of 29th April, 2008 had put a rider on petitioner to seek prior permission of trial court before leaving the country. Waiver of aforesaid rider is sought by petitioner in this petition. At the hearing, learned senior counsel for petitioner had drawn the attention of this Court to trial courts order of 12th January, 2015 to point out that petitioners earlier application to tra...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »