Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cit Vs. Big Apple Clothing Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-12-2015
$~2 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. 02.2015 + ITA14282006, C.M. APPL.2553-2554/2015 C.I.T ..... Appellant versus M/S. ESCORTS LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA20112010 CIT ..... Appellant versus BIG APPLE CLOTHING PVT. LTD. + ..... Respondent ITA12622011, C.M. APPL.21759/2011 CIT ..... Appellant versus NARESH. K. TREHAN + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 836/2007, C.M. NO.1490/2007 ESCORTS LTD. ..... Petitioner versus ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Parag. P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Simran Mehta and Sh. Prabhat Kalia, Advocates, for petitioner in Item No.5 and for the respondents in Item Nos. 2 and 3. Ms. Suruchii Aggarwal and Ms. Sonia Dhamija, Advocates, for appellants in Item Nos. 2 to 5 ITA142806, ITA201110, ITA126211 & W.P.(C)836/07 Page 1 Dr. Rakesh Gupta and Sh. Mukul Mathur, Advocates, for respondent in Item No.4. Sh. Shashwat Bajpai, Advocate. Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Sh. Ashwani Taneja, Ms. Poonam Ahuja and Sh. Mukul Mathur, Advoca...
Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Others Vs. Union of India and Anoth ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 309/2015 % Judgment delivered on:11. 02.2015 JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANOTHER Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioners : Mr Kapil Sibal, Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocates with Mr Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr Rajat Jariwal and Mr Aakash Bajaj For the Respondents : Mr Mukul Rohatgi, AG and Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Akshay Makhija, Mr Shresth Jain and Ms Devanshi Singh. WITH WP (C) 310/2015 JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & OTHERS Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioners : Dr A.M. Singhvi with Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr Advocates, Mr Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr Prateek Kumar, Ms Diya Chaturvedi and Mr L. Zafeer Ahmed For the Respondents : Mr Mukul Rohatgi, AG and Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Akshay Makhija, Mr Shresth Jain and Ms Astha Jain. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDE...
Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Another Vs. Union of India and Othe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 309/2015 % Judgment delivered on:11. 02.2015 JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & ANOTHER Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioners : Mr Kapil Sibal, Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr Advocates with Mr Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr Rajat Jariwal and Mr Aakash Bajaj For the Respondents : Mr Mukul Rohatgi, AG and Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Akshay Makhija, Mr Shresth Jain and Ms Devanshi Singh. WITH WP (C) 310/2015 JINDAL STEEL & POWER LIMITED & OTHERS Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:For the Petitioners : Dr A.M. Singhvi with Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr Advocates, Mr Sanjeev Kapoor, Mr Prateek Kumar, Ms Diya Chaturvedi and Mr L. Zafeer Ahmed For the Respondents : Mr Mukul Rohatgi, AG and Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Akshay Makhija, Mr Shresth Jain and Ms Astha Jain. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDE...
Davinder Kumar Chadha and Anr Vs. Pushpa Rani Sahani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 133/2012 & CM Nos. 5133/2012 and 17713/2014 Reserved on:3. d February, 2015 Decided on:11. h February, 2015 % DAVINDER KUMAR CHADHA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jatin Singh, Mr. Akhilesh Aggarwal and Mr. Aman, Advocates. versus PUSHPA RANI SAHANI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajendra Dutt and Mr. Vineet Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 Aggrieved by the order dated 2nd March, 2012, whereby the Petitioners leave to defend application in an eviction petition filed by the Respondent under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) was dismissed, the Petitioners prefer the present petition.2. In the eviction petition, the Respondent stated that she was the owner and landlord of one shop and almirah in the property bearing No.WZ-678, Rishi Nagar, Shakur Basti, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as tenanted premises) which was let out to the P...
Jagdeo Singh @ Jagga Vs. The State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 527 of 2014 Reserved on: January 9, 2015 Decision on: February 11, 2015 JAGDEO SINGH @ JAGGA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.D. Rana, Advocate versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell WITH CRL. A. 529 of 2014 GURDEEP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Gautam, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell WITH CRL. A. 607 of 2014 SUKHVINDER SINGH @ SUKHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1102.2015 Introduction 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 21 st December 2013 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS in SC No.82 of 2008 convicting Jagdeo Singh @ Jagga (Accused No.1) (A-1) (Appellant in Crl.A. No.527 of 2014) for the offences under Section 21 (c) and 29...
Alpha Tiger Cyprus Investments Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Shakti Nath and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) 17/2015 ALPHA TIGER CYPRUS INVESTMENTS LTD. & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Puri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ruchin Midha, Advocate. versus SHAKTI NATH & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Milanka Choudhary and Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1102.2015 IA No.3016 of 2015 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. OMP (I) No.17 of 2015 3. Notice. Mr. Abhishek Sharma, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents.4. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, learned Senior counsel appearing for the Respondents, referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in National Aluminium Co. Limited v. Pressteel & Fabrications (P) Limited (2004) 1 SCC540to urge that the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) cannot be entertained in view...
M/S U.D.K Papers Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Glory Graphics Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
$~A-6. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: January 27, 2015 Date of Decision: February 11 , 2015 + IA No.16993/2013 in CS(OS) 1987/2012 M/S U.D.K PAPERS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. K.Venkatraman, Adv. versus M/S GLORY GRAPHICS PVT LTD .... Defendant Through Mr. Vikas Chhabra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.16993/2013 1. This application has been filed by the defendant under Order 37 Rule 3(5) for leave to defend on behalf of the defendant.2. The plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of Rs.29,02,788/-. As per the plaint, the defendant is a customer which purchased material i.e., paper from time to time. It is averred that from 01.04.2009 to 04.11.2009 against 10 different invoices, paper worth Rs.31,77,139/- were supplied to the defendant. The material was supplied on 60 days credit and the defendant is said to have made part payment of Rs.15,07,998/leaving a balance of Rs.16,69,151/- which the defendant is liable to p...
Sukhvinder Singh @ Sukhi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 527 of 2014 Reserved on: January 9, 2015 Decision on: February 11, 2015 JAGDEO SINGH @ JAGGA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.D. Rana, Advocate versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell WITH CRL. A. 529 of 2014 GURDEEP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Gautam, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell WITH CRL. A. 607 of 2014 SUKHVINDER SINGH @ SUKHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1102.2015 Introduction 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 21 st December 2013 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS in SC No.82 of 2008 convicting Jagdeo Singh @ Jagga (Accused No.1) (A-1) (Appellant in Crl.A. No.527 of 2014) for the offences under Section 21 (c) and 29...
Gurdeep Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 527 of 2014 Reserved on: January 9, 2015 Decision on: February 11, 2015 JAGDEO SINGH @ JAGGA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.D. Rana, Advocate versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell WITH CRL. A. 529 of 2014 GURDEEP SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Gautam, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell WITH CRL. A. 607 of 2014 SUKHVINDER SINGH @ SUKHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP SI: Surender Singh, Special Cell CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1102.2015 Introduction 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 21 st December 2013 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS in SC No.82 of 2008 convicting Jagdeo Singh @ Jagga (Accused No.1) (A-1) (Appellant in Crl.A. No.527 of 2014) for the offences under Section 21 (c) and 29...
Amitabh Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-11-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 20, 2015 Judgment Delivered on: February 11,2015 + W.P.(C) 6549/2013 AMITABH SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Rekha Palli, Ms.Punam Singh & Ms.Garima Sachdeva, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The petitioner assails the order dated August 19, 2013 whereby he has been dismissed from service. He prays to be reinstated in service with consequential benefits.2. Brief facts giving backdrop of the petitioner being dismissed from service are that while working as a Deputy Commandant in the Central Reserved Police Force (CRPF), in May, 2007 the petitioner was nominated as a Member of a Recruitment Board for appointing ASI (Stenographer) and HC(Min.) at the Group Centre of CRPF in Muzaffarpur. Dr.Bhavna Kumari in the medical cadre of CRPF was a Mem...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »