Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Izajul and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$-47 & 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 155/2015 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate versus AISA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: + Nemo. MAC.APP. 157/2015 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate versus MOHD. IZAJUL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL.2715/2015 (Exemption) in MAC APP.155/2015 CM.APPL.2738/2015 (Exemption) in MAC APP.157/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Both the applications stand disposed of. MAC.APP.155/2015 & CM.APPL.2716/2015 (stay) MAC.APP.157/2015 & CM.APPL.2739/2015 (stay) 1. It is urged by Mr. A.K.Soni, learned counsel for the Appellant that since the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident was the owner himself and since he did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, the Appellan...
Darshan Kumar (Since Deceased) Through Lrs Vs. Punjab National Bank an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2357/2000 18th February, 2015 % DARSHAN KUMAR (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRs ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.R.K.Saini, Advocate. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vaibav Kalra with Ms.Sumedha Dang, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M.No.________/2015 (to be numbered and registered by the registry) There is no opposition to this application and which is therefore allowed and the legal heirs of the petitioner are brought on record. Amended memo of parties be taken on record. Application stands disposed of W.P.(C) No.2357/2000 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner, the erstwhile employee of the respondent no.1/Punjab National Bank seeks the relief of quashing the action of respondent no.1 in denying the petitioner the pensionary benefits.2. The issue is whether a person ...
Ravi Pratap and Ors. Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$~1 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 18, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 5273/2013 SANDEEP & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. C.B. Garg and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates versus STATE & OTHERS Through: + (ii) .....Respondents Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Raj Pal Mr. Salil Malik and Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocates with complainant in person CRL.M.C. 4009/2013 RAVI PRATAP & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Salil Malik and Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr.Praveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Raj Pal Complainant party in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CRL.M.C. 5273 & 4009 of 2013 Page 1 % JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. FIR No.127/2013, under Sections 427/323/341/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 5273/2013]. and FIR No.126/2014 under Sections 308/323/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C.4009/2013]....
Sh. Sri Ram Mann Vs. Delhi State Ind. Dev. Corpn. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.2009/2000 18th February, 2015 SH. SRI RAM MANN ..... Petitioner Through: None. versus DELHI STATE IND. DEV. CORPN. & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appeared on behalf of the parties, although it is 12.45 PM. I have therefore perused the record and am proceeding to dispose of the petition.2. Petitioner, an employee of the respondent no.1 and earlier of the respondent no.2/Delhi State Mineral Development Corporation, by this writ petition, seeks the following reliefs:a) hold that the order of termination dt. 30.6.93 is illegal, invalid, arbitrary, discriminatory, mala fide and inoperative. The same may be quashed. The petitioner be treated in continuous service during the period from 1.7.93 to 18.8.96 holding that his services were never lawfully terminated. Respondents may be called upon to pay salary & allo...
Ram Suresh Vs. Bunty and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 368/2012 RAM SURESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus BUNTY & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saral Chaturvedi, Adv. with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The appeal is for enhancement of compensation of Rs.9,27,974/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellant (the Claimant) for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 07.04.2009 at 6:30 p.m. near Shanker Crossing Flyover, Gurgaon resulting in amputation of Appellants left leg above knee.2. The Claims Tribunal awarded the total compensation of Rs.9,27,974/- which is tabulated in para 20 of the impugned judgment and is extracted hereunder:- a) Medical expenses Rs.19,270/- b) Loss of income Rs.47,208/- c) Loss of future income (earning capaci...
Junaid and Ors. Vs. The State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 18, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 591/2015 JUNAID & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ravinder Kumar and Mr. G.S. Dhama, Advocates versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Kuldeep Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.300/2013, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 registered at police station Khajuri Khas, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 23rd August, 2013 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (Annexure P-3). Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for CRL.M.C. 591/2015 Page 1 respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FI...
Shanti Devi and Ors Vs. Vinod and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$-10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 526/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: ..... Appellant Mr.D.K. Sharma, Advocate versus SHANTI DEVI & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Harish Nigam, Advocate for Respondents no.1 to 5. MAC.APP. 775/2012 SHANTI DEVI AND ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Harish Nigam, Advocate versus VINOD AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. D.K. Sharma, Advocate for Respondent no.3 Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals (MAC. APP. 526/2012 and MAC. APP. 775/2012) arise out of the judgment dated 15.03.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.8,11,477/- was awarded to Respondents no.1 to 5 (in MAC.APP.526/2012), who are the legal representatives of deceased Prem Shanker who suffered fatal injuries in a motor veh...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Aisa and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$-47 & 49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 155/2015 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate versus AISA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: + Nemo. MAC.APP. 157/2015 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate versus MOHD. IZAJUL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL.2715/2015 (Exemption) in MAC APP.155/2015 CM.APPL.2738/2015 (Exemption) in MAC APP.157/2015 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Both the applications stand disposed of. MAC.APP.155/2015 & CM.APPL.2716/2015 (stay) MAC.APP.157/2015 & CM.APPL.2739/2015 (stay) 1. It is urged by Mr. A.K.Soni, learned counsel for the Appellant that since the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident was the owner himself and since he did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident, the Appellan...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mukesh Kumar and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP.1305/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.L.Nandwani, Adv. versus MUKESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Pratibha Shukla, Adv. for R-1. Mr. R.B. Shami, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.292/2014 (O.1 Rule 10 CPC) 1. This application has been moved by the Appellant for deletion of Respondents no.4 to 6. Since the Appellant Insurance Company has not challenged the amount of compensation, Respondents no.4 to 6 are not really concerned with the instant appeal. Their presence is dispensed with.2. Service is complete.3. Application stands disposed of. MAC.APP.1305/2012 4. The only ground of challenge raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant Insurance Company is that the Appellant having proved conscious and willful breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, it ought to have been compl...
Manish Tehlan and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1735/2014 MANISH TEHLAN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ashok Ahlawat & Mr. Yogesh, Advocates versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Tej Ram PS Najafgarh Respondents No.2 & 3-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER % 18.02.2015 By way of this petition, quashing of FIR No.192/2014 under Sections 452/308/34 of IPC registered at police station Najafgarh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) entered into between the parties on 23rd March, 2014 and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Notice. Ms Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court, are the complainant-party of FIR in question and they have been identified to be so b...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »