Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jitender Yadav and Ors. Vs. Indra Gandhi National Open University and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 1775/2015 JITENDER YADAV & ORS. ..... Petitioner versus INDRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sharad Prakash Pandey and Mr Deepesh Divedi. For the Respondents : Mr Aly Mirza and Mr Kulish Tanwar for R-1. Mr Sunil Singh Parihar for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners claim to be students who had obtained admission in the course of Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) with All India Society for Electronics and Computer Technology (AISECT) Bhopal (i.e. respondent no.2 herein). The petitioners allege that it was represented to them that AISECT was conducting the said course in collaboration with Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU).2. It is asserted that AISECT had adopted more than 5000 multipurpose training centres including over 4000 common ser...
Kapil Mohan and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 761/2015 KAPIL MOHAN & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. J.L. Behl, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState SI Shri Gopal Ms. Shiv Kumari, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.254/2000, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station Shakarpur, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 6th May, 2014 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Notice. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice for respondent-State and Ms. Shiv Kumari, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State CRL.M.C. 761/2015 Page 1 submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/firstinformant of the FIR in...
State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Arvind Kumar Jaiswal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. L.P. 354/2014 Reserved on:28. h January, 2015 Date of Decision:27. h February, 2015 % State of NCT of Delhi Through ....Appellant Mr. Varun Goswami, APP along with SI Shri Ram, PS Hari Nagar. Versus Arvind Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. Through Respondents Mr. Aseem Bhardwaj & Mr. K.K. Vijay, Advocates for respondents 1 and 2. Mr. Vikram Singh Saini, Adv. For respondent 3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. ENDLAW SANJIV KHANNA, J.We are inclined to grant leave to appeal against Arvind Kumar Jaiswal @ Thakur. However, we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal against Pramod Kumar and Sohan Singh for the reasons set out below.2. Against Arvind Kumar Jaiswal, the prosecution version relies upon:(i) Statements of Mohd. Salim (PW1), Vijay Kumar (PW2), father and Sheela (PW19), mother of the deceased Ritik, to the effect that respondent Arvind Jaiswal was their tenant for about two years. (ii) Vijay Kumar (PW2) and Shee...
Jagdish Prasad Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20. h February, 2015 Judgment Pronounced on:27. h February, 2015 CRL.REV.P. 470/2008 JAGDISH PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra,Senior Advocate with Mr. Aditya Alok and Ms.Naina Dubey, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K.Mishra, APP for the State. None for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 14.09.1999 and order on sentence dated 24.09.1999 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, convicting the petitioner under Section 494 IPC and awarding the sentence to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and fine of Rs.2,000/- for offence under Section 494 IPC, in default to further undergo six months simple imprisonment and upholding the judgment of conviction and sentence by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 28.07.2008, the present revision petition has been filed by...
Commissioner of Income Tax-8 (Erstwhile Cit-Iii) Vs. Soyuz Industrial ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 27th February, 2015 + ITA1582015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 (ERSTWHILE CIT-III) ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, sr. standing counsel versus SOYUZ INDUSTRIAL RESOURCES LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Jain and Mr. Madhur Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the ITAT) dated 22.08.2014 dismissing its appeal ITA No.3853/Del/2010. It urges that in the given circumstances of the case, the ITATs findings that the Commissioner of Income Tax lacked the authority to sanction re-assessment proceedings through issuance of notice under Section 148, was unjustified.2. The brief facts of the case are that for Assessment Year (AY) 2002-03, the assessee had filed its returns in a normal course on 16.10.2002. The assessment was...
Prem Lata Cpio Trade Marks Registry, Delhi Vs. Central Information Com ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2015 % + LPA4442012 & CM No.10451/2012 (for stay) PREM LATA CPIO TRADE MARKS REGISTRY, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P. Buttan, Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Ms. Ritika Gambhir &Ms. Vithika Garg Advs. Versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION & ORS. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj & Ms. Aditi Bhati, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Ashish Singh, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Gaurav Arora & Mr. Himanshu Arora, Advs. for R-3, 6 to 9. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 26th April, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of this Court, of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.2458/2012 preferred by the appellant.2. The writ petition from which this appeal arises, was filed impugning the order dated 24th November, 2011 (the said order, on the first page bears the date of decision as 25th October, ...
Dilip Bhaskar Vs. The State Govt of Nct Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 760/2015 & Crl. M.As. No.2873-74/2015 DILIP BHASKAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankit, Advocate versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Karan Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState SI Vineet Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.588/2014, under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at police station New Ashok Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 24th November, 2014 (Annexure P-2). Notice. Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice for respondent-State and Mr. Ashutosh Dubey, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits CRL.M.C. 760/2015 Page 1 that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FI...
Jitender @ Jeetu @ Haddi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 14th February, 2015 Judgment delivered on 27th February, 2015 + CRL.A. 1347/2014 % AHESAN ABBAS @ MONU Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Advocate. Versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + CRL.A. 1375/2014 JITENDER @ JEETU @ HADDI Appellant Through: Mr. Kartickay Mathur, Advocate. Versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State + RAVI STATE CRL.A. 1703/2014 Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Advocate Ms. Shiv Chopra, Advocate and Ms. Megha, Advocate. Versus Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for the State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 02.05.2014 and order on sentence dated 29.05.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in S.C. No.97/2008. The appeals have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common...
Rajat Lal Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
$~100 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 27, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 777/2015 RAJAT LAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Varun Goswami, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Rakesh Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.552/2014, under Section 406 of IPC registered at police station Bharat Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by SI Rakesh on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute CRL.M.C. 777/2015 Page 1 between the parties has been amicably resolv...
Advocate Manish Kumar Khanna Vs. The Hon???ble Delhi High Court and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-27-2015
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h February, 2015 % + W.P.(C) No.442/2014, CMs No.1394/2014 (for direction)& 1176/2015 ADVOCATE MANISH KUMAR KHANNA Through: Petitioner in person. .... Petitioner Versus THE HONBLE DELHI HIGH COURT & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC and Mr. Rahul Jain, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta with Ms. Madhavi Khare, Advs. for DHC. Mr. Ashish Dixit, Adv. with Vice President and Secretary of DPWA, Interveners. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), seeks the reliefs of, (i) a direction to this Court to follow the mandatory direction of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Anil Rai regarding passing of the judgments / orders within two months of the hearing etc.; (ii) a direction to this Court to follow the model case law system a...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »