Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhoop Singh Vs. The Managing Director, M/S. Indian Airlines Ltd. and
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.20178/2005 19th February, 2015 % BHOOP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : None. versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Rohit Kumar Aggarwal, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who was an employee of Indian Airlines Limited; represented by respondents no.1 to 3, seeks the relief of release of all the withheld increments by taking the service of the petitioner, for 22 and a half years from 1983 without any break and with consequential directions being prayed for the release of appropriate monetary benefits and pension.2. A reading of the writ petition shows that in fact there is no legal cause of action pleaded as to how the petitioner should get the benefit of 22 and a half years of service without break, and...
State Vs. Pradeep Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL LEAVE PETITION No.492/2014 Date of decision:19. h February 2015 % . Petitioner STATE Through : Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State. versus ..Respondent PRADEEP KUMAR Through : None. CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SISTANI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G. S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The State by this Criminal Leave Petition No.492/2014, under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (hereafter called "Trial Court") dated 26.05.2014 in Sessions Case No.42/2011 thereby acquitting the respondent under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The brief facts of the case, as alleged by the prosecution are that, on 26.04.2011 at 7am DD No.7 was recorded in police station Harsh Vihar on an information received that a quarrel had taken place between husband and wife. PW-13 HC Harkesh who was on duty was given this DD call and on reaching the s...
Seema Chhabra and Ors Vs. Raj Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 893/2010 SEEMA CHHABRA & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. with Mr. Rajeshwar P. Gupta, adv. versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Savita Singh, Adv. for OICL/R-3. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for ICICI/R-6. Mr. S.N.Parashar, Adv. for R-7 & 8. MAC.APP. 34/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Savita Singh, Adv. versus SEEMA CHHABRA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. with Mr. Rajeshwar P. Gupta, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R-4 & 5. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for ICICI/R-10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 26.08.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `48,70,560/- was awarded in favour of the Claimants for the death of Sanjeev Chhabra, who died in ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nishi Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~R-11-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:19. 02.2015 + ITA120125/2000 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .... Appellant in all cases versus NISHI MEHRA ..... Respondent in ITA1202000 ARUN MEHRA ..... Respondent in ITA1212000 SUSHIL MEHRA ..... Respondent in ITA1222000 SUBHASH MEHRA ..... Respondent in ITA1232000 SURBHI MEHRA ..... Respondent in ITA1242000 MANJU MEHRA ..... Respondent in ITA1252000 Appearance: Mr. Nitin Gulati, Jr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. Ms. Kavita Jha with Ms. Shardha, Advocates for assessee. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The sole question framed for consideration in these appeals is as follows: - ITA120125/2000 Page 1 Whether ITAT has rightly interpreted scope, power and jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in block assessment proceedings and the term undisclosed income?.2. All the appeals arise out of the common order made by the ITAT. The Revenue contends that the...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Seema Chhabra and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~9 & 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 893/2010 SEEMA CHHABRA & ORS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. with Mr. Rajeshwar P. Gupta, adv. versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Savita Singh, Adv. for OICL/R-3. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for ICICI/R-6. Mr. S.N.Parashar, Adv. for R-7 & 8. MAC.APP. 34/2011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Savita Singh, Adv. versus SEEMA CHHABRA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Adv. with Mr. Rajeshwar P. Gupta, Adv. for R-1 to R-3. Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. for R-4 & 5. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. for ICICI/R-10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two appeals arise out of the judgment dated 26.08.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of `48,70,560/- was awarded in favour of the Claimants for the death of Sanjeev Chhabra, who died in ...
Rama Nand Vashista and Ors. Vs. The Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : February 18, 2015 W.P.(C) 7375/2013 KRISHAN GOPAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner None versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Sagari Dhanda, Advocate for R-3 Mr.V.Sudeer, Advocate with Mr.Alvin, Advocate for UGC W.P.(C) 9/2014 DR. M.M.A ANSARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Naushad A.Khan, Advocate with Mr.Ekram Ali Ansari, Advocate versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.M.A.Siddiqui, Advocate for R-1 Ms.M.S.Gupta, Advocate with Ms.Mrinalini S.Gupta, Advocate with Ms.M.Chatterjee, Advocate for R-3 Mr.V.Sudeer, Advocate with Mr.Alvin, Advocate for UGC W.P.(C) 393/2014 RAMA NAND VASHISTA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Praveen Kumar Rai, Advocate with Mr.Hemal Kr.Sheth, Advocate versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Kunal Punj, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI Ms.Beenashaw Soni, Advocate with Mr.Amit Bansal ...
Krishan Gopal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision : February 18, 2015 W.P.(C) 7375/2013 KRISHAN GOPAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner None versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Sagari Dhanda, Advocate for R-3 Mr.V.Sudeer, Advocate with Mr.Alvin, Advocate for UGC W.P.(C) 9/2014 DR. M.M.A ANSARI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Naushad A.Khan, Advocate with Mr.Ekram Ali Ansari, Advocate versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.M.A.Siddiqui, Advocate for R-1 Ms.M.S.Gupta, Advocate with Ms.Mrinalini S.Gupta, Advocate with Ms.M.Chatterjee, Advocate for R-3 Mr.V.Sudeer, Advocate with Mr.Alvin, Advocate for UGC W.P.(C) 393/2014 RAMA NAND VASHISTA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Praveen Kumar Rai, Advocate with Mr.Hemal Kr.Sheth, Advocate versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Kunal Punj, Advocate for Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC for UOI Ms.Beenashaw Soni, Advocate with Mr.Amit Bansal ...
Rajender Singh Vs. State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 7414/2010 & CM No.4431-4432/2013 RAJENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner versus STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Harvinder Oberoi and Mr Jawahar Singh. For the Respondent : Mr Pramod Kumar. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J CM No.4431-4432/2013 For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed. W.P.(C) 7414/2010 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 12.03.2010 (hereafter the impugned award) whereby the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (hereafter the Tribunal) held that the charges of misconduct were proved against the petitioner and imposed the punishment of dismissal of the petitioner from the services of the respondent bank.2. Brief facts that are relevant for examining the controversy in the present petition are as under:2.1 The petitioner was working as an empl...
M/S Sarda Energy and Minerals Ltd Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 1384/2015 & CM24312015, 2629/2015 & 2630/2015 M/S SARDA ENERGY & MINERALS LTD ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ratan K. Singh with Mr Shashi Bhushan, Mr Suraj Prakash and Mr J.K. Chaudhary For the Respondent Nos. 1&2 : Mr Sanjay Jain, ASG with Mr Akshay Makhija, Ms Devanshi Singh, Ms Aastha Jain and Mr S. Jain For the Respondent No.5 : Mr Ragvesh Singh CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The challenge in this petition is to the conjoint effect of Clauses 4.1.2(d) and 3.3.2 of the tender document for three coal blocks Gare Palma IV/1, Gare Palma IV/4 and Gare Palma IV/7.2. The case of the petitioner is that by virtue of Clause 4.1.2(d), a single company, having several end-use plants, can have multiple bids inasmuch as a bid for each of t...
Forbes Facility Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. G.B. Pant Hospital
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-18-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on February 10, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 18, 2015 + OMP No.129/2015 FORBES FACILITY SERVICES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Surekha Raman & Mr.R.R.Makar, Advocates versus G.B. PANT HOSPITAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Andley, Advocate with Mr.Arun Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: (a) pass an order staying the effect and operation of the order bearing No.F.58/MISC./Sanitation/GBPH/Estt./2014-15/10801 dated 12.08.2014, issued by the respondent. (b) pass an order staying the effect and operation of the order bearing No.11628 dated 28.08.2014, issued by the respondent. (c) pass an order directing the respondent to release to the petitioner the amount of Rs. 3,77,19,974 as on 31.12.2014 due and payable by the respondent to the petitioner under t...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »