Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Parshad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3552/2013 & Crl. M.A. No.656/2014 Date of Decision :19. h February, 2015 RAJESH PARSHAD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal & Mr. S. K. Chaudhary, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Yogesh Kumar and Mr. P.N. Diwan, Authorized Representative of Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.311/2001, under Sections 420 of IPC and 78/79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 and Section 63 of the Indian Copy Rights Act, 1957, registered at police station Kotwali, Delhi is sought on the strength of amicable resolution of the dispute between the parties vide Memorandum of Understanding of 21 st August, 2013. Notice. Mr. Parveen Bhati, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that Mr. P.N. Diwan, Authorized Representative of respondent No.2, present i...
the State Trading Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Global Steel Holdings L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General, with Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet and Mr. Arunima Pal, Advocates versus GLOBAL STEEL HOLDINGS LTD ETC.ETC .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain and Mr. Gautam Mitha, Advocates + (ii) CRL.M.C. 1534/2014 & Crl.M.As.5193/2014, 12346/14 UDAY PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain and Mr. Gautam Mitha, Advocates versus STATE & ANR CRL.M.Cs. 2707, 1534, 1537, 1535 & 1536 of 2014 .....Respondents Page 1 Through: + (iii) Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General, with Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet and ...
Jagmohan Singh Sachar Renu Sachar Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h February, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2630/2014 JAGMOHAN SINGH SACHAR RENU SACHAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K.Bhaduri & Ms. Kirti Parmar, Advocates with Petitionerin-person versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Mr.Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with Inspector Mahesh Soni PS Saket Mr. K.L.Mishra, Advocate for Complainant Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (O R A L) % Quashing of FIR No.85/2013 under Sections 468/120B/471/420/467 IPC registered at Police Station Saket, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 2nd April, 2014 arrived at between the parties in Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. Parveen Bhati, Additional Public Prosecutor for Crl.M.C.No.2630/2014 Page 1 respondent-State submits that respondent...
the Commissioner, Vat Vs. A.K. Woollen Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :19. 02.2015 + ST.APPL. 65/2014 THE COMMISSIONER, VAT ..... Appellant Through : Sh. H.C. Bhatia, Special Counsel. versus A.K. WOOLLEN INDUSTRIES ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. GAUBA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. APPL.17882/2014 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned. The application is accordingly allowed. ST.APPL. 65/2014 1. The question of law sought to be urged by the Revenue in this case is whether the DVAT Tribunal acted correctly in holding that in the absence of rules under Section 59(2) of the DVAT Act, 2004 (hereafter referred to as the Act), penalty action under Section 86(14) for non-compliance with Sections 59(1), (2) and (3) could not have been initiated and taken. ST.APPL.65/2014 Page 1 2. We have considered the submissions on behalf of the Revenue and further considered the record. The DVAT Tribuna...
Imamuddin and Anr. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~37 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 705/2014 IMAMUDDIN & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: + (ii) .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Amit Bhati Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 1143/2014 MOHD. SHADAB ABID & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Amit Bhati Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. CRL.M.C. 705 & 1143 of 2014 Page 1 FIR No.617/2013, under Sections 323/336/506/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 705/2014]. and FIR No.616/2013 under Sections 323/341/427/506/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C.1143/2013]., both registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought ...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Lal Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 651/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus LAL SINGH & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent (owner) MAC.APP. 662/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus SMT SUMITRA DEVI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate + MAC.APP. 73/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus SUMITRA DEVI & ORS Through MAC APP6512013, 662/2013, 73/2015 & 74/2015 ..... Respondents + MAC.APP. 74/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT1 These four appeals arise out of common judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby t...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Ashok Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 371/2007 ASHOK AGGARWAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Nitinjya Chaudhary, Advocate with Mr. Atreya Singh, Advocate versus SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Advocate for Respondent no.3. MAC.APP. 233/2007 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: ..... Appellants Mr. J.N. Aggarwal, Advocate versus ASHOK AGGARWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Nitinjya Chaudhary, Advocate with Mr. Atreya Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT1 These two appeals arise out of judgment dated 01.12.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby compensation of Rs.4,98,148/- was awarded in favour of Ashok Aggarwal (Appellant in MAC. APP. 371/2007) and Delhi Transport Corporation(DTC) (Appellant in MAC.APP.233/2007) was made liable to pay the compensation along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition.2. MAC....
Neeraj Vs. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 651/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus LAL SINGH & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent (owner) MAC.APP. 662/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus SMT SUMITRA DEVI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate + MAC.APP. 73/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus SUMITRA DEVI & ORS Through MAC APP6512013, 662/2013, 73/2015 & 74/2015 ..... Respondents + MAC.APP. 74/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT1 These four appeals arise out of common judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby t...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Smt Sumitra Devi and O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 651/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus LAL SINGH & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent (owner) MAC.APP. 662/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus SMT SUMITRA DEVI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate + MAC.APP. 73/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus SUMITRA DEVI & ORS Through MAC APP6512013, 662/2013, 73/2015 & 74/2015 ..... Respondents + MAC.APP. 74/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT1 These four appeals arise out of common judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby t...
Rao Satvir Singh Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h February, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5838/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.19927/2014 RAO SATVIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Namita Roy & Mr. Sugriva Dubey, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State SI Sunil PS Chhawala Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER (O R A L) Quashing of FIR No.152/2013 under Section 419/420 IPC registered at Police Station Chhawala, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 18th December, 2014 (Annexure-P-2), and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR now stands cleared between the parties. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/firstinformant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so by SI Sunil on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Crl....
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »