Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lt.R.P.Yadav Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 19, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.77/2014 LT.R.P.YADAV Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated September 24, 2013 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal rejecting MA No.277/2012 and MA No.478/2012 wherein prayer made by the writ petitioner was to be permitted to examine Lt.CommanderV.K.Lekhi and Lt.Commander S.Gantyat on oath; and that the respondents be directed to produce the investigation reports of the said persons submitted in terms of Regulation 149 of Part II (Statutory) Regulations for the Navy.2. Briefly encapsulated, the facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition are that in the month of March 2001, the petition...
Raman Mahindra and Ors Vs. Adarsh Bala Sud @ Adarsh Kumari and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 1950/2013 RAMAN MAHINDRA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Amit Sethi, Advocate with Mr. Ishan Khanna, Advocate. versus ADARSH BALA SUD @ ADARSH KUMARI & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Advocate with Mr. Daleep Kr. Dhayani, Advocate for defendants No.1 and 2. Mr. Lalit Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Payal Gupta, Advocate for defendants No.3 and 4. Reserved on :14. h January, 2015 Date of Decision :19. h February, 2015. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 15186/2014 in CS (OS) 1950/2013 1. Present application has been filed by the defendants No.1 and 2 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint.2. Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, learned counsel for defendants No.1 and 2- applicants submitted that prayers in the suit for partition and declaration were on the face of it barred by limitation. He stated that as the Will dated 18th September, 2001 was a registered Will, the date of its r...
Cook Suresh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : February 19, 2015 + W.P.(C) 8114/2013 COOK SURESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms.Niti Jain, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Advocate with Ms.Silky Luthra, Advocate for R-1 to R-6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner was given employment as a cook by the Central Reserved Police Force and while on probation his services were terminated by an order dated February 14, 2007, which reads as under:NOTICE FOR TERMINATION OF SERVICE In pursuance of rule Proviso to sub rule (1) of rule 5 of the Central Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, I, Gurdeep Singh Addl. DIGP GC, CRPF, Neemuch hereby terminate forthwith the services of No.055220481 Cook/Hosp Suresh Kumar of GC, CRPF, NMH and direct that he shall be entitled to claim a sum equiva...
Anshul Jain Vs. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Lt
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4410/2013 19th February, 2015 % ANSHUL JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Advocate. Versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks employment to the post of Assistant Manager (Finance) with the respondent no.1 on the ground that the petitioner has cleared both the written test and the interview. Petitioner has been disqualified by the respondent no.1 on account of his medical condition which states that petitioner can only see with one eye. Respondent no.1 therefore has found the petitioner to be unfit for employment in the C-1 category being the post of Assistant Manager (Finance) and for which post as per the advert...
Mandeep Singh Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 4973/2014 MANDEEP SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Yogesh Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState with SI Rakesh Kumar Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % Quashing of FIR No.267/2014, under Sections 309/336/323 of IPC and Section 30 of the Arms Act registered at police station Roop Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2/complainant of this FIR and on the ground that incident in question was purely accidental. Notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by SI Rakesh Kumar on the basis of ident...
Neeraj Vs. Sumitra Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:19. h February, 2015 + MAC.APP. 651/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus LAL SINGH & ORS Through + ..... Respondents Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for Respondent (owner) MAC.APP. 662/2013 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate versus SMT SUMITRA DEVI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate + MAC.APP. 73/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus SUMITRA DEVI & ORS Through MAC APP6512013, 662/2013, 73/2015 & 74/2015 ..... Respondents + MAC.APP. 74/2015 NEERAJ ..... Appellant Through None versus BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT1 These four appeals arise out of common judgment dated 16.05.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby t...
Uday Pratap Singh Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General, with Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet and Mr. Arunima Pal, Advocates versus GLOBAL STEEL HOLDINGS LTD ETC.ETC .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain and Mr. Gautam Mitha, Advocates + (ii) CRL.M.C. 1534/2014 & Crl.M.As.5193/2014, 12346/14 UDAY PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain and Mr. Gautam Mitha, Advocates versus STATE & ANR CRL.M.Cs. 2707, 1534, 1537, 1535 & 1536 of 2014 .....Respondents Page 1 Through: + (iii) Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General, with Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet and ...
Mohd. Shadab Abid and Anr. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~37 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 705/2014 IMAMUDDIN & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: + (ii) .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Amit Bhati Respondent No.2 in person CRL.M.C. 1143/2014 MOHD. SHADAB ABID & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Amit Bhati Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % JUDGMENT (ORAL) In the above-captioned two petitions, quashing of cross FIRs i.e. CRL.M.C. 705 & 1143 of 2014 Page 1 FIR No.617/2013, under Sections 323/336/506/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C. 705/2014]. and FIR No.616/2013 under Sections 323/341/427/506/34 of IPC [in CRL.M.C.1143/2013]., both registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought ...
Anil Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h February, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 2889/2014 ANIL KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. H.S.Mehra, Advocate versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Saroj Bala PS Chhawala Mr. Rajesh Tanwar, Advocate with Respondent No.2-in-person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER (O R A L) Quashing of FIR No.7/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of IPC registered at Police Station Chhawala, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 22nd August, 2013, arrived at between the parties. Upon notice, Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2-Meenakshi, present in the Court, is the complainant/first-informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by her counsel as well as by WSI Saroj Bala on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Crl.M.C.No.2889/2014 Page...
Global Steel Philippines Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2015
$~12, 16, 17, 18 & 20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 19, 2015 + (i) CRL.M.C. 2707/2014 THE STATE TRADING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General, with Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet and Mr. Arunima Pal, Advocates versus GLOBAL STEEL HOLDINGS LTD ETC.ETC .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain and Mr. Gautam Mitha, Advocates + (ii) CRL.M.C. 1534/2014 & Crl.M.As.5193/2014, 12346/14 UDAY PRATAP SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pankaj Baghla, Ms. Chaitali Jain and Mr. Gautam Mitha, Advocates versus STATE & ANR CRL.M.Cs. 2707, 1534, 1537, 1535 & 1536 of 2014 .....Respondents Page 1 Through: + (iii) Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Attorney General, with Mr. K.Raghavacharyulu, Mr. Kailash Panedy, Mr. Ranjeet and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »