Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 20 2015

Yogesh Ray and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-20-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2015 + + W.P.(C) 182/2014, CM APPLs. 317/2014 and 20375/2014 MUKESH RAO & ORS. Through: Versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advs. for R-1 to R-3. W.P.(C) 194/2014, CM APPLs. 343/2014 and 4755/2014 VIVEK KUMAR & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC + W.P.(C) 323/2014, CM APPL. 623/2014 YOGESH RAY & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Adv. W.P.(C) 552/2014, CM APPL. 1102/2014 SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. Versus _______________________________________________________________________ UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Jasw...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2015

Mukesh Rao and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-20-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Dheeraj Mor Vs. The Hon???ble High Court of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Writ Petition (Civil) No.9303/2014 Reserved on:5. h February, 2015 Date of Decision:19. h February, 2015 % DHEERAJ MOR Through Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Dalal & Mr. B.S. Mor, Advocates. Versus THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI Respondent Through Mr. Rajiv Bansal with Ms. D. Ray Chaudhary & Ms. Pallavi, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The petitioner is a judicial officer, who joined Delhi Judicial Service on 8th September, 2009. He was enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of India on 3rd August, 2002 and thereafter had worked as an Assistant Public Prosecutor from 2nd April, 2006 till 2nd April, 2008, when he joined Haryana Judicial Service. Thus, the petitioner claims that he has completed seven years of practice at the Bar.2. The petitioner is not seeking promotion as an officer of the Delhi Judicial Service to the Delhi Higher Judi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Anil Bhatia and Ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:19. h February, 2015 + W.P.(C) No.6711/2013, CM No.14566/2013 (for directions) & CM No.15413/2013 (u/O1 R-10 of the CPC). ANIL BHATIA & ORS. Through: ....Petitioners Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Ms. Shloka Rawat and Mr. Syed Musaib, Advs. for Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for R-1. Mr. P.R. Chopra, Adv. for R-3/ECI. Mr. Anish Dayal, Adv. for Intervener in CM No.15413/2013. Inspr. Satyavir, P.S. Bindapur. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The petitioners no.1 & 2 i.e. Anil Bhatia and Satyadev Solanki, being members / volunteers of petitioner no.3 Aam Aadmi Party, seek declaration that the Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007 (hereinafter called Defacement Act) does not prohibit putting up of posters / banners, on ones own private property or house/building, or with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Brij Rattan Bagri Vs. Uma Rani Jain

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9. h January, 2015 Decided on:19. h February, 2015 % + RC.REV. 106/2012 and CM Nos. 4245/2012, 7662/2013 BRIJ RATTAN BAGRI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D.K. Sharma and Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocates. versus UMA RANI JAIN Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate. RC.REV. 115/2012 and CM No.4645/2012 CHAND RATTAN BAGRI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arujun Mitra, Advocate. versus UMA RANI JAIN & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D.K. Sharma and Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.2 Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The revision petitions challenge the common impugned order dated 15th November, 2011 whereby the respondents eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short DRC Act) was allowed and the petitioners were direct...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Sunhill Public School Vs. Govt. of Nct, Delhi and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 02.2015 W.P.(C) 7710/2013 & CM No.16415/2013 SUNHILL PUBLIC SCHOOL ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr R. K. Saini. For the Respondents : Ms Ruchi Sindhwani, ASC, GNCTD, Ms Bandana Shukla, Ms Megha Bhadana with Mr Vinay Verma Dy. Education Officer/R1 to 3. Mr Atul Kumar for R- 4/CBSE. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns an order dated 04.09.2013 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Lieutenant Governor (Appellate Authority) rejecting the petitioners appeal under Section 3(4) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereafter the Act). The said appeal was filed by the petitioner assailing an order dated 03.12.2012 passed by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT withdrawing the recognition granted to the petitioner for upgradation from secondary school to senior s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Karan @ Vicky Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1704/2014 Date of decision:19. h February, 2015 KARAN @ VICKY ..... Appellant Through Ms. Nandita Rao, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Varun Goswami, APP along with Inspector Subodh Kumar, ATO, Patel Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Appellant-Karan @ Vicky by the impugned judgment dated 11 th September, 2014 stands convicted for offences under Sections 147/148 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) in a charge sheet arising out of FIR No.182/2007, Police Station Patel Nagar. By order on sentence dated 11th September, 2014, the appellant-Karan has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 149, IPC. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is required to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Common Cause Vs. Subhash Jain, Ex-Councillor and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2015 % W.P.(C) No.2992/2013, CM No.5648/2013 (for stay) and CM No.12086/2013 (u/O1R10CPC). COMMON CAUSE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Raghav Shankar with Ms. Malavika Lal, Adv. Versus SUBHASH JAIN, EX-COUNCILLOR & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Rohit Gandhi and Mr. Mehak Kanwar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. B.C. Bhatt with Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. for R-3. Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Adv. for R-4. Mr. Vinay Gupta & Mr. R. Ravi, Advs. for R-7. Mr. M. Tripathi, Adv. for R-8. Inspr. Raj Kumar Saha, SHO/P.S. Madhu Vihar. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for R-9 to 11. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) impugns (as illegal, null, void and ultra vires the Constitution of India), the orders of the respondent no.9, Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, acting as Competent ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Sylvania and Laxman Employees Welfare Union Vs. Shyama Aggarwal and Or ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19th February, 2015 % + CONT.CAS (C) No.667/2011 SYLVANIA & LAXMAN EMPLOYEES WELFARE UNION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Mr. Amit Rana, Advocates. Versus SHYAMA AGGARWAL & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Dr. Saif Mahmood and Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner Union seeks directions to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying with the orders dated 30.03.2011 and 02.05.2011 passed in LPA No.773/2010 and Review Petition No.249/2011 respectively by the Division Bench of this Court.2. Mr. N.S. Dalal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner Union submitted that on account of illegal closure of the company, the petitioner Union had to initiate the proceedings, pursuant to which a recovery certificate was issued by the A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 2015

Chand Rattan Bagri Vs. Uma Rani Jain and Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-19-2015

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.