Delhi Court February 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Chauhan Khadya Bhandar Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9109/2007 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 M/S.CHAUHAN KHADYA BHANDAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Pradeep Gupta, Advocate versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned cancellation order dated 27.10.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner (South).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner had been granted licence for running the Fair Price Shop (for short, FPS) No.6649 under Circle No.35 in the year 1981 under Delhi Specified Articles (Regulations of Dist...
Ebony Retail Holdings Ltd Vs. Shanti Prakash Gupta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order: February 20, 2015. + CO.APP. 2/2015 EBONY RETAIL HOLDINGS LTD Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Ekta Kalra Sikri, Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocates versus SHANTI PRAKASH GUPTA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) This matter is being adjourned for the last three dates at the request of the learned counsel for the appellant for seeking instructions from the appellant as to the amount that could be paid by the appellant towards the arrears of the rent in respect of the ground and the first floor of Crown Plaza Mall, Faridabad (subject property). Ms. Ekta Sikri representing the appellant on instructions from Mr.Rakesh Bhalla, authorised representative of the appellant company M/s. Ebony Retail Holdings Ltd., submits that the appellant is prepared to pay an amount of Rs.73,80,653/- by way of 12 post...
Sita Ram Store Vs. The Commissioner Food and
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 906/2008 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 SITA RAM STORE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Nitin Sehgal, Advocate versus THE COMMISSIONER FOOD & SUPPLIES DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned cancellation order dated 10.10.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner (W) and order dated 21.1.2008 passed by Secretary-cum-Commissioner in appeal preferred by the petitioner against the cancellation order dated 10.10.2007 of Asstt. Commissioner (W).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the peti...
Shri Vinod Kumar and Ors. Vs. M/S. Netaji Subhash Institute
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.1941/2010 20th February, 2015 % SHRI VINOD KUMAR & ORS. Through: Mr. ..... Petitioners Paramjeet Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. NETAJI SUBHASH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Ms. Anchal Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. There are four petitioners in this writ petition. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners claim that they should be regularized in their posts from the date of their original appointments on ad hoc basis. Since the facts with respect to the four petitioners are more or less similar, for the sake of convenience reference is made to the facts qua petitioner No.1.2. Petitioner No.1 joined the services of the respondent No.1 originally as a daily wager on 19.10.1994 in which position he worked till 26.5.1998. Petitioner No.1 was th...
Krishan Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5648/2013 KRISHAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Anil Mittal & Mr. Zishan Khan, Advocates versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat & Ms. Latika Choudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER % 20.02.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) By this present Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks to question the tenability of the orders dated 10.05.2012 and 01.08.2012 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the CAT) whereby it dismissed T.A. No.1276/2009 and R.A. No.213/2012 respectively. The main grievance raised by the petitioner is that the learned CAT has failed to appreciate the fact that the petitioner had opted for pension after taking voluntary retirement after having served the respondentCorporation for about 15 years, but his request was not acceded to by the respondent- Corporation....
M/S.Sain Dass Surinder Kumar Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9459/2007 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 M/S.SAIN DASS SURINDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Pradeep Gupta, Advocate versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan and Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the impugned cancellation order dated 17.9.2007 issued by Assistant Commissioner (NE).2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner firm had been granted licence for running the Fair Price Shop (for short, FPS) No.4207 under Circle No.48 in the year 1981 under Delhi Specified Articles (Regulations of D...
Shri Gauri Shanker Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)8755/2007 % Judgment dated 20.02.2015 SHRI GAURI SHANKER Through : ..... Petitioner Counsel for the petitioner versus GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.S.D. Salwan & Ms.Latika Dutta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other writ directing respondents to quash the show cause notice dated 15.10.2007 and the impugned order dated 7.11.2007 by which licence of the petitioner was cancelled.2. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present writ petition are that the petitioner had been granted licence no.1172/73 dated 6.6.1973 for running the Kerosene Oil Depot (for short, KOD) at Shop No.40, Village Mochi Bagh, Nanakpura, N...
v.K. Kadyan Vs. P.K. Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1533/2015 & CM APPL. No.2731/2015 (Direction) V.K. KADYAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate versus P.K. GUPTA Through ..... Respondent Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA % ORDER2002.2015 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By this Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 12.12.2014 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the CAT) whereby the learned CAT had dismissed the Contempt Petition No.4/2014 in O.A. No.1640/2013 preferred by the petitioner.2. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition is that the respondents have committed contempt of the Court by not promoting him to the post of Superintending Engineer (Civil) in terms of the direction given by the learned CAT vide order dated ...
Sushil Kumar and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2015 + + W.P.(C) 182/2014, CM APPLs. 317/2014 and 20375/2014 MUKESH RAO & ORS. Through: Versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advs. for R-1 to R-3. W.P.(C) 194/2014, CM APPLs. 343/2014 and 4755/2014 VIVEK KUMAR & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC + W.P.(C) 323/2014, CM APPL. 623/2014 YOGESH RAY & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Adv. W.P.(C) 552/2014, CM APPL. 1102/2014 SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. Versus _______________________________________________________________________ UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Jasw...
Vivek Kumar and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2015 + + W.P.(C) 182/2014, CM APPLs. 317/2014 and 20375/2014 MUKESH RAO & ORS. Through: Versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advs. for R-1 to R-3. W.P.(C) 194/2014, CM APPLs. 343/2014 and 4755/2014 VIVEK KUMAR & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Vikram Jetly, CGSC + W.P.(C) 323/2014, CM APPL. 623/2014 YOGESH RAY & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Adv. W.P.(C) 552/2014, CM APPL. 1102/2014 SUSHIL KUMAR & ORS...... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Advs. Versus _______________________________________________________________________ UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Jasw...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »